Re: [devel] [PATCH 00 of 15] Review Request for AMF: Coverity issues in amfd/amfnd [#680]

2014-01-09 Thread Hans Feldt
Is this a patch series for 4.5 or default? The ticket is an enhancement, is the 4.4 window closed? Thanks, Hans On 01/03/2014 06:51 AM, Gary Lee wrote: Summary: AMF: Coverity issues in amfd/amfnd [#680] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 680 Peer Reviewer(s): Hans N, Hans F, Praveen,

Re: [devel] [PATCH 00 of 15] Review Request for AMF: Coverity issues in amfd/amfnd [#680]

2014-01-09 Thread Gary Lee
Hi There are some memory leaks fixed in the patch series that would be applicable to 4.4. I guess I should extract just the leak fixes for the next 4.4 candidate / correction release? Thanks Gary Quoting Anders Björnerstedt anders.bjornerst...@ericsson.com: Yes 4.4 window is closed since

Re: [devel] [PATCH 00 of 15] Review Request for AMF: Coverity issues in amfd/amfnd [#680]

2014-01-09 Thread Hans Feldt
Yes please do that asap, you do need defect tickets per service also... Thanks, Hans -Original Message- From: Gary Lee [mailto:gary@dektech.com.au] Sent: den 9 januari 2014 13:26 To: Anders Björnerstedt Cc: Hans Feldt; Hans Nordebäck; praveen.malv...@oracle.com;

Re: [devel] [PATCH 00 of 15] Review Request for AMF: Coverity issues in amfd/amfnd [#680]

2014-01-09 Thread Anders Björnerstedt
Yeah, fixes to memory leaks would be fixes of defects, not classed as enhancements. Youn need to write at least one separate defect ticket for the memory leak problems. Defects should be fixed on all supported branches, where applicable. In general, the point with discriminating between the

[devel] [PATCH 00 of 15] Review Request for AMF: Coverity issues in amfd/amfnd [#680]

2014-01-02 Thread Gary Lee
Summary: AMF: Coverity issues in amfd/amfnd [#680] Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 680 Peer Reviewer(s): Hans N, Hans F, Praveen, Nagendra Pull request to: Affected branch(es): default Development branch: default Impacted area Impact y/n