Looks OK.
/Bertil
-Original Message-
From: Ingvar Bergström
Sent: den 28 november 2013 14:34
To: Bertil Engelholm
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 1 of 1] SMF: comparsion of attr saAmfSUMaintenanceCampaign and
campaign DN corrected(#640)
osaf/services/saf/smfsv/
Hi Hans,
Thanks for the patch. But, this change is not in scope of this ticket.
You can create a ticket for adding su in oper state and we can take test it in
those scenarios.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com]
Sent: 21 November 20
Oops, forgot about that one. It is fixed now.
thanks,
Anders Widell
2013-12-02 07:43, Ramesh Betham skrev:
> Hi Anders,
>
> make rpm fails, please check. (osaf_poll.h, osaf_time.h should add in
> ../osaf/libs/core/common/includeMakefile.am)
>
> Thanks,
> Ramesh.
>
> libopensaf_common_la-osaf_pol
The POLLHUP seems to happen quite frequently (revents=17), so I will
filter the log messages in that case.
regards,
Anders Widell
2013-11-29 09:53, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu skrev:
> Ack.
> Good that you were able to work on this ticket, would be a good value add.
> One comment is that, we s
Summary: logsv: Handle log files on both active and standby
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #152
Peer Reviewer(s):
Pull request to: <>
Affected branch(es): default (4.4)
Development branch: <>
Impacted area Impact y/n
Doc
Hi,
It seems (from my testing) that the patch fixes the problem for
pre-instantiable service units. But most likely not for
non-pre-instantiable SUs.
Your code comment started my thinking that we should really be checking SUs
Readiness State for INSERVICE instead.
Which means cluster_su_insta
Hi Hans,
NPI is not started till given assignment, so I don't understand, why
npi su should be considered or was rather left out in the patch ? Please
elaborate.
I will change the function name.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Hans Feldt [mailto:hans.fe...@ericsson.com]
"The readiness state of a non-pre-instantiable service unit is in-service if
all of
the following conditions are met:
* its operational state and the operational state of its containing node is
enabled
"
So what I mean is the logic cannot check presence state since NPI SUs would not
be INSTANT
Hi,
I am confused by this:
saCkptTrack - This function enable the Ckpt Track call back
saCkptCheckpointTrack - This function enables the specific Checkpoint Track
call back
The latter is empty, can you explain?
Thanks,
Hans
On 12/02/2013 07:37 AM, mahesh.va...@oracle.com wrote:
> opensa
osaf/services/saf/immsv/README | 14 +++-
osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.2PBE| 20 +++--
osaf/services/saf/immsv/README.NO_DANGLING | 113 +
3 files changed, 137 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Also updated README.2PBE with a pointer to always
Summary: IMM: Update the README file to document NO_DANGLING [#635]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 635
Peer Reviewer(s): Neel ; Zoran
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): default(4.4)
Development branch:
Impacted area Impact y/n
---
osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c | 15 +++
1 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c
b/osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c
--- a/osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c
+++ b/osaf/tools/safimm/immadm/imm_admin.c
@@ -37,6 +
Summary: IMM: immadm aware of admowner safImmService for
opensafImm=opensafImm,safApp=safImmService [#642]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 642
Peer Reviewer(s): Neel
Pull request to:
Affected branch(es): default(4.4)
Development branch:
Impacted area Im
Hi,
The scope of this patch is primarily to convert the existing
functionality to SAF API syntax.
i.e The existing functionality supports tracking checkpoint writes "per
(user- initialized handle) SaCkptHandleT ".
So, this existing functionality shall be provided by this API saCkptTrack().
Hav
Summary:cpsv: Memory Leaks when reploc node add & delete in cpd [#529]
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #529
Peer Reviewer(s): Ramesh
Pull request to: <>
Affected branch(es): default
Development branch: default
Impacted area Impact y/n
---
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpd_cb.h | 5 +-
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_db.c| 38 +++
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_imm.c | 39 ++-
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_proc.c | 32 +--
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpd/cpd_sbevt.c | 5
Updated conditions of submission below.
Anders Bjornerstedt wrote:
> Summary: IMM: Update the README file to document NO_DANGLING [#635]
> Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 635
> Peer Reviewer(s): Neel ; Zoran
> Pull request to:
> Affected branch(es): default(4.4)
> Development branch:
>
>
17 matches
Mail list logo
