osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/di.cc | 8 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
After SC absence, active amfd will reject messages from 'veteran' amfnds until
its local amfnd has started. During this period, if a PG track action msg
is sent and rejected by amfd, it will cause
osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfExecControlHdl.cc | 69 ++---
osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfExecControlHdl.h | 13 +--
osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfUpgradeCampaign.cc | 1 +
3 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
diff --git
Summary: smf: balanced upgrade, missing removal of exectrl copy
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): #2114
Peer Reviewer(s): lennart
Pull request to: <>
Affected branch(es): <>
Development branch: <>
Impacted area Impact y/n
Hi!
Build fails on the opensaf-5.0.x branch after ticket [#2087] was pushed:
CXX osafsmfd-SmfCampaignInit.o
SmfCampaignInit.cc:230:2: error: ‘upActiter’ does not name a type
upActiter = m_campInitAction.begin();
^
SmfCampaignInit.cc:231:2: error: expected unqualified-id before
Hi Hung,
Reviewed the patch.
Ack from me.
Thanks,
Zoran
-Original Message-
From: Hung Nguyen [mailto:hung.d.ngu...@dektech.com.au]
Sent: den 12 oktober 2016 05:02
To: Zoran Milinkovic ;
reddy.neelaka...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
ACK
On 10/10/2016 01:46 PM, Neelakanta Reddy wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Reviewed and tested the patch.
> Ack.
>
> /Neel.
>
> On 2016/10/07 11:10 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
>> osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfStepState.cc| 13
>> osaf/services/saf/smfsv/smfd/SmfUpgradeProcedure.cc | 68
>>
Hi Hung,
Reviewed and tested the patch.
Ack.
/Neel.
On 2016/10/11 09:27 AM, Hung Nguyen wrote:
> osaf/tools/safimm/immcfg/imm_cfg.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
>
> Don't finalize admo if it hasn't been initialized.
>
> diff --git
Ok ACK , not tested.
-AVM
On 10/12/2016 12:42 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> I added one comment in "PATCH 0 of 1", telling reason why not using ha
> state.
> Here it is.
> //>
> Previous fix is not correct as ha state in cb is not changed
> when entering QUIESED state. So,
Hi Vu,
If possible use global `lgs_conf.logRootDirectory` after the call
`lgs_rootpathconf_set(new_logRootDirectory)`
instead of passed `new_logRootDirectory` parameter.
-AVM
On 10/12/2016 12:39 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> See my comment inline.
>
> Regards, Vu
>
>>
Hi Mahesh,
I added one comment in "PATCH 0 of 1", telling reason why not using ha
state.
Here it is.
//>
Previous fix is not correct as ha state in cb is not changed
when entering QUIESED state. So, basing on ha_state variable
is not correct. Using is_quiesced_set flag instead.
//<
Regards,
Hi Vu,
Can we use (cb->ha_state != SA_AMF_HA_ACTIVE) instead of
`cb->is_quiesced_set == true`
as if this is a agent response, so it will have more readability .
-AVM
On 10/11/2016 10:36 AM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
> osaf/services/saf/logsv/lgs/lgs_evt.cc | 12 +++-
>
Hi Mahesh,
See my comment inline.
Regards, Vu
> -Original Message-
> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 1:52 PM
> To: Lennart Lund ; Vu Minh Nguyen
>
> Cc:
Ok,
ACK.
-AVM
On 10/12/2016 12:27 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
> Hi Mahesh,
>
> In README file, there is a note on this. Refer to "Note on memory handling
> for writting log record"
>
> And caller here means the one that call the function `log_stream_write_h`,
> not log client.
>
> Regards, Vu
>
Hi Mahesh,
In README file, there is a note on this. Refer to "Note on memory handling
for writting log record"
And caller here means the one that call the function `log_stream_write_h`,
not log client.
Regards, Vu
> -Original Message-
> From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com]
Hi VU,
ACK with following :
Not an issue but It is good to use lgs_conf.logRootDirectory insted of
new_logRootDirectory
for the remaining part of logRootDirectory_filemove() , because
mutex_unlocked for lgs_conf.logRootDirectory
-AVM
On 10/10/2016 4:48 PM, Lennart Lund wrote:
> Hi Vu
>
>
Hi Vu,
`Return (-1) to inform that it is caller's responsibility to free the
allocated mem` is this existing practices for application ?
or new , if new do we need to document it .
-AVM
On 10/12/2016 10:14 AM, A V Mahesh wrote:
> ACK
>
> -AVM
>
>
> On 9/13/2016 4:19 PM, Vu Minh Nguyen wrote:
16 matches
Mail list logo