Hello All,
I'm experimenting with the checkpoint service, and some things don't appear
to work.
The saCkptActiveReplicaSet and saCkptCheckpointSynchronize[Async] don't
appear to work when the checkpoint has section numbers greater than around 5500.
I've created a checkpoint with
, Alex Jones wrote:
Hello All,
I'm experimenting with the checkpoint service, and some things
don't appear to work.
The saCkptActiveReplicaSet and
saCkptCheckpointSynchronize[Async] don't appear to work when the
checkpoint has section numbers greater than around 5500.
I've created
with SA_TIME_ONE_DAY ?
-AVM
On 1/7/2014 1:17 AM, Alex Jones wrote:
AVM,
I've been playing around with your test program, and have gotten
it to fail.
I made the following changes:
1. Change init_dataX to be 1024k bytes, so that you are initializing
the section to be 1024k.
2
to take a deeper look at this, but I'm mentioning it in case
it rings any bells. I am using TIPC as the transport.
Alex
On 01/07/2014 07:24 AM, Alex Jones wrote:
AVM,
I get SA_AIS_ERR_TIMEOUT even when I pass SA_TIME_END as the
timeout value. Is this not a bug? the synchronous
((MDS_DIRECT_BUF_MAXSIZEMDTM_NORMAL_MSG_FRAG_SIZE)? \
(MDS_DIRECT_BUF_MAXSIZE+SUM_MDS_HDR_PLUS_MDTM_HDR_PLUS_LEN):(MDTM_NORMAL_MSG_FRAG_SIZE+SUM_MDS_HDR_PLUS_MDTM_HDR_PLUS_LEN))
==
-AVM
On 1/8/2014 10:42 PM, Alex Jones wrote
))
==
-AVM
On 1/8/2014 10:42 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
Hi Hans,
Changing rmem_default and rmem_max has no effect on the problem.
I even tried up to 2M to no avail.
However, after looking
AVM,
In my 5+1 setup, when I have the standby node open all the
checkpoints and read from them, as well as open the hot-standby
callback, the section creates done on the other active nodes can take a
very long time. (For 40k sections, it can sometimes take over 2 minutes).
Once the
the
SA_CKPT_WR_ACTIVE_REPLICA or SA_CKPT_WR_ACTIVE_REPLICA_WEAK property by
making this asynchronous.
Any chance we can change this behaviour, and make it like
saCkptCheckpointWrite?
Alex
On 01/14/2014 03:16 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
AVM,
In my 5+1 setup, when I have the standby node open all
to do it.
Alex
On 01/14/2014 05:13 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
3.7.1 saCkptSectionCreate()
If the checkpoint was created with the SA_CKPT_WR_ALL_REPLICAS
property, the section is created in all of the checkpoint replicas
when the invocation returns; otherwise, the section has been created
Privyet Mihkail!
I have the work done, but I don't have the patch file created yet. I was
going to create a ticket, and attach the patch to it.
I will try to do it today.
I will let you know.
Alex
On 02/04/2014 09:24 AM, Domrachev, Mikhail wrote:
Hi, Alex.
Currently I'm fixing that issue
Hello All,
I'm seeing a problem with SaAmfSIDependency when it is used between
SIs in different SGs of different types.
object class=SaAmfSIDependency
dnsafDepend=safSi=Management-2N\,safApp=ManagementApp,safSi=Management-NoRed2,safApp=ManagementApp/dn
/object
In
:
Please specify which version of OpenSAF is being used.
Also please tell the steps performed.
Thanks,
Praveen
On 04-Mar-14 5:40 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
Hello All,
I'm seeing a problem with SaAmfSIDependency when it is used
between
SIs in different SGs of different types
Praveen,
Can you either post or send me privately the final imm.xml file?
Alex
From: praveen malviya [praveen.malv...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, March 07, 2014 3:28 AM
To: Alex Jones
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel
I'm seeing a problem when doing an administrative shutdown on an SG with
dynamically created CSIs.
I'm assuming that dynamically creating CSIs is supported...
I have an N+1 service group with one component entirely in the imm.xml
config file including CSIs. There is another component in this
SaAmfCSIAssignments in IMM.
Then when you issue SHUTDOWN from the admin API, amfnd on the standby
doesn't remove the CSIs because it doesn't think it ever assigned them.
Does this ring any bells with anyone?
Alex
On 04/04/2014 06:22 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
I'm seeing a problem when doing an administrative
I notice that dynamically changing saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs for an N+1
service group is not supported, unless the service group is not unlocked.
This prevents in-service capacity addition which really should be supported.
Let's say you have a 6-slot ATCA chassis, but you only want to use 3
everything through, and might not
expect it. How would we pick which one to move? By rank?
Alex
On 04/22/2014 02:47 AM, Hans Feldt wrote:
Please do, that would be great.
Thanks,
Hans
On 11 April 2014 17:37, Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com wrote:
I notice that dynamically changing
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset 9e1708d7a66517fcff52d6af094000feb1897143
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 15:56:46 -0400
amfd: fix infinite loop when processing CLM
Actually, it is a PLM Deactivation request, which CLM translates into
NODE_LEFT.
Alex
On 04/29/2014 10:15 AM, Hans Feldt wrote:
What is the test case, CLM node lock?
/Hans
-Original Message-
From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@genband.com]
Sent: den 29 april 2014 16:04
To: Hans Feldt
Guys,
Gentle reminder to ack...
Alex
On 04/29/2014 10:21 AM, Alex Jones wrote:
Actually, it is a PLM Deactivation request, which CLM translates into
NODE_LEFT.
Alex
On 04/29/2014 10:15 AM, Hans Feldt wrote:
What is the test case, CLM node lock?
/Hans
-Original Message
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset e14b3510889d13784714b33648d104ec218a64f4
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 11:59:41 -0400
amfnd: fix process of proxy/proxied
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/clc.cc | 27 +++
1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
May 2 15:22:11 linux osafamfnd[2990]: NO
'safSu=Management-SU1,safSg=Management-2N,safApp=ManagementApp' Presence State
INSTANTIATED = TERMINATION_FAILED
May 2 15:22:38
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset 3e3f3f22c8d18430a807cc33a0c89617b71f6891
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 15:02:32 -0400
amfd: fix SU in-service macro [#493]
May 2 18:56:32 linux
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/su.h | 13 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
May 2 18:56:32 linux osafamfnd[12420]: NO Assigned
'safSi=Dataplane-Np1-SI-1,safApp=DataplaneApp' STANDBY to
'safSu=Dataplane-SU1,safSg=Dataplane-Np1,safApp=DataplaneApp'
May 2
state, SU operational state, and
SU presence state.
Thanks,
Hans
-Original Message-
From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@genband.com]
Sent: den 2 maj 2014 21:27
To: Hans Feldt; praveen.malv...@oracle.com; nagendr...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 1
(avd_sg_2n_su_chose_asgn() for 2N model) also.
Thanks,
Praveen
On 03-May-14 12:57 AM, Alex Jones wrote:
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/include/su.h | 13 +
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
May 2 18:56:32 linux osafamfnd[12420]: NO Assigned
'safSi=Dataplane-Np1-SI-1,safApp
for INSTANTIATED has been added.
What do you think?
Thanks,
Hans
-Original Message-
From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@genband.com]
Sent: den 6 maj 2014 18:07
To: Hans Feldt; praveen.malv...@oracle.com; nagendr...@oracle.com
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH
Ack.
Alex
On 05/07/2014 07:03 AM, Hans Feldt wrote:
Summary: Fix SU in-service calculation
Review request for Trac Ticket(s): 493
Peer Reviewer(s): Alex Nags
Pull request to: LIST THE PERSON WITH PUSH ACCESS HERE
Affected branch(es): all
Development branch: 4.3
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg.cc | 39 +++
1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
ccb_completed_modify_hdlr: Attribute 'saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs' cannot be
modified when SG is unlocked
OpenSAF disallows changing saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs while the
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset e5f045244159cdd5c70e76d600c7caf92cdbd058
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 14:57:28 -0400
amfd: allow change
=
sg-saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs;
+ else
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@genband.com]
Sent: 13 May 2014 00:36
To: hans.fe...@ericsson.com; Nagendra Kumar; Praveen Malviya
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 1
bae2d2e9601f2e1f09e4ac8d60d4e118b448cd20
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 17:40:58 -0400
amfd: allow increase of saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs for N+M SG while
UNLOCKED
[#871]
ccb_completed_modify_hdlr: Attribute 'saAmfSGNumPrefActiveSUs' cannot
Samples n
Tests n
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE
changeset 6f9c8080657af783462c52d81137e41038aee6a6
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
Please ignore the previous fat-finger submission.
changeset 6f9c8080657af783462c52d81137e41038aee6a6
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Tue, 20 May 2014 17:03:25 -0400
cpnd
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfnd/clc.cc | 20
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
May 2 15:22:11 linux osafamfnd[2990]: NO
'safSu=Management-SU1,safSg=Management-2N,safApp=ManagementApp' Presence State
INSTANTIATED = TERMINATION_FAILED
May 2 15:22:38 linux
/testing
the complete patch (database a C++ STL map for fast access ) ,for now
my initial comment is :
On 5/21/2014 2:57 AM, Alex Jones wrote:
make MAX_SYNC_TRANSFER_SIZE much smaller: 3M instead of30M.
Considering the below fragmentation changes (changesets 5279- 5282) ,
I hope
08c4e042835b7dbf45876c10fd3b1db5ba066319
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Mon, 02 Jun 2014 17:03:09 -0400
osaf: port existing daemonization and nid process to systemd new-style
daemon [#455]
Jun 2 16:55:57 linux-po6q osafrded[16114]: Started Jun 2 16:55:57 linux-
po6q osafrded
Makefile.common | 1 +
configure.ac | 16 ++
contrib/plmc/Makefile.common | 1 +
contrib/plmc/config/plmcd.conf | 4 +
one is more
strange, though. Do you get this message on your system? Do you get
the same log message? Maybe this configuration option has changed in
recent versions of systemd?
/ Anders Widell
On 06/02/2014 11:12 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
Summary: osaf: port existing daemonization and nid
it. No attempt has been made to convert the individual daemons to
systemd, except for plmcd, which has been converted to a full-blown systemd
daemon. I've built and run this for Fedora 19, OpenSUSE 12.2, and OpenSUSE
13.1.
changeset b14cec02030e81cbeaa1404849971205291f148b
Author: Alex Jones ajo
Makefile.common | 2 +
configure.ac| 18 +++
contrib/plmc/Makefile.common| 1 +
contrib/plmc/config/Makefile.am | 6 +
versions, maybe another option is
needed?
/ Anders Widell
On 06/10/2014 05:30 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
Oh great...
After a quick perusal of the systemd changelogs, it looks like they
removed support for ControlGroup in systemd-205, replacing it with
different attributes. ControlGroup
scope for each y above):
-
changeset 00bdfc09aa2fc605cdbc7f9a90d19de3e1c95853
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:28:49 -0400
plm: add support for ATCA-specific entity paths [#881]
Jun 20 14:17:18 linux
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_epath_util.c | 32 +---
1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Jun 20 14:17:18 linux-po6q osafplmd[20561]: ER epath_matched: 0,
he_type_idr_matched: 0#011#011HE. ent_path:
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_hrb.c | 36 +++
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_hsm.c | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_he_pres_fsm.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Jun 20 13:47:58 linux-po6q osafplmd[4923]: ER
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
This patch addresses some bugs using HPI.
changeset 77393bd4f86585391e7829b082214c6afcb9af4a
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2014 15:45:09 -0400
plm: plm does not always
Responses inline...
Alex
On 07/02/2014 03:39 AM, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu wrote:
Alex,
Good start to the migration to systemd.
After reading the reviews in lwn, the early impression i get is that
even though there are no direct benefits for us, like for eg:- i haven't seen
much of
Responses inline:
On 07/03/2014 03:26 PM, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu wrote:
Comments inline:
-Original Message-
From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@genband.com]
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2014 12:07 AM
To: Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_hrb.c | 35 ---
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_he_pres_fsm.c | 8 ++--
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
Jul 14 16:56:02 linux-po6q osafplmd[32627]: ER plms_hrb_req FAILED. Ent:
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset 49a80c50cd5c7e8579106e3c328cc42f6fb14b56
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2014 17:15:35 -0400
plm: use SAHPI_HS_ACTION_XXX for activating
One comment. From the man page of localtime_r:
According to POSIX.1-2004, localtime() is required to behave as though
tzset(3) was called, while localtime_r() does not have this
require-
ment. For portable code tzset(3) should be called before
local-
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE
changeset 52c97ed2c36dcbf5d0a3e2135e0134a73670f09a
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2014 17:06:02 -0400
plmc: Get inventory
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_hsm.c | 6 +-
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_he_pres_fsm.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
PLM Presence State for a FRU that is in M1 (present, but inactive) shows up as
SA_PLM_HE_PRESENCE_NOT_PRESENT, when PLM
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_he_pres_fsm.c | 49 -
1 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
saPlmHEPresenceState still showing NOT_PRESENT when HPI first starts, and a FRU
is PRESENT, but not ACTIVE.
The HE is first created with NOT_PRESENT state. When
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
Forgot to submit this code in the original review.
changeset b5e399fd0bb8e8fa67bbd7db9156c09b29cb889b
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2014 10:51:14 -0400
plm: Add
osaf/libs/common/plmsv/include/plms.h| 1 +
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_imm.c | 15 +++
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_main.c | 13 -
3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
SMF rolling upgrade with reboot fails for standby controller when HPI
4b0c14f493672ebfe2ebb28b755710f9279f1c65
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2014 13:17:30 -0400
plm: increase plmd timeout and add blocking HPI call during plms init
[#977]
The previous patch didn't quite fix the entire problem.
Even though the SessionOpen
osaf/services/infrastructure/nid/config/nodeinit.conf.controller | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_hsm.c | 40
+++---
2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
The previous patch didn't quite fix the entire problem.
Even though the SessionOpen
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/Makefile.am |1 +
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpnd.h |1 +
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpnd_cb.h | 14 +-
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpnd_init.h | 15 +-
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpnd_sec.h | 60
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
This patch should fully replace the patch posted on May 20. It contains updates
from comments received.
changeset 4ede43c2720f9d9599da83b3cd6d93b29b5f3c6d
Author: Alex Jones ajo
;
+}
=
-AVM
On 8/7/2014 9:08 PM, Alex Jones wrote:
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/Makefile.am |1 +
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpnd.h |1 +
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpnd_cb.h | 14 +-
osaf/libs/common/cpsv/include/cpnd_init.h | 15 +-
osaf
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_adm_fsm.c | 29 -
1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Doing PLM admin RESET on an HE with no EE never returns.
The code assumes that there is always an EE associated with an HE, which is not
true. It always waits for
n
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE
changeset d2e9dbb3cb18c9b52c51edff4760b79fb329bfb6
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2014 11:06:13 -0400
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_hsm.c | 24 +++-
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_utils.c| 11 ++-
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
Aug 22 21:14:18 linux osafplmd[10076]: ER Entity safHE=XXX,safDomain=xxxDomain
can not be
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE
changeset 80c9d0759c9cc818e8416f1d4fdd9aee60598b6f
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 17:39:09 -0400
plm: ignore MDS events from other
Yes, much better solution. I will resubmit the patch.
Alex
On 08/28/2014 01:55 AM, Nagendra Kumar wrote:
Hi Alex,
I would suggest to change subscription to
NCSMDS_SCOPE_INTRANODE instead.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo
93890d241919770f80a9f431fcb56398d076e819
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:17:37 -0400
plm: change PLMS_HRB MDS subscription to INTRANODE [#1026]
Aug 27 0:32:50.265452 osafplmd [12007:plms_common_mds.c:0081] ER
INVALID MSG
FORMAT IN ENC
When
Yes, it is always reproducible.
I think this came out due to checkin 5581 (ticket #977). In order to
handle a fast switchover during SMF upgrade, we decided to start the HPI
thread on the standby at init time and wait for the inventory to be
there before responding.
Alex
On 08/28/2014 10:48
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE
changeset 98bb99f081bbdc340a151425e94a418071390d59
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Tue, 02 Sep 2014 13:20:02 -0400
plm: don't reset self during
# HG changeset patch
# User Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
# Date 1409678402 14400
# Tue Sep 02 13:20:02 2014 -0400
# Node ID 98bb99f081bbdc340a151425e94a418071390d59
# Parent 12251687a7e6ade049c5de9b3e4536b98e5b2091
plm: don't reset self during plms_ee_instantiate [#1031]
Active
# HG changeset patch
# User Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
# Date 1410281601 14400
# Tue Sep 09 12:53:21 2014 -0400
# Node ID 1e666e56246f4f18063be688cbadb48465ee4cbd
# Parent 12251687a7e6ade049c5de9b3e4536b98e5b2091
plm: don't reset self during plms_ee_instantiate [#1031]
Active
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset 1e666e56246f4f18063be688cbadb48465ee4cbd
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 12:53:21 -0400
plm: don't reset self during plms_ee_instantiate [#1031
Hi Mathi,
This was flagged by valgrind as an overlapping buffer copy. It's
just copying itself onto itself! And then in the next line this same
structure gets filled in by ioctl(). It's really just bad, dead code,
so I removed it.
I will take a look at 1073.
Alex
On 09/18/2014
Hey Anders Mathi,
Do you have a pointer to your presentation that you can share, for
those of us who were not able to make it?
Has anyone written a document which offers best practices on
using OpenSAF in the cloud? For instance, I see that
container/contained is not yet
Hi Guys,
I'm chasing an issue with N+M, and before I dig deeper to fix it I
wanted to see if any of you know about it.
Here's what I do:
1. si-swap of OpenSAF-2N controller
2. AMF node lock of now standby controller
This (now OpenSAF standby) controller has an active
Message-
From: Nagendra Kumar
Sent: 25 October 2014 00:11
To: Alex Jones; Hans Feldt; Praveen Malviya
Cc: opensaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [devel] N+M standby assignment to two different SUs
My mistake, I had given red as Nway. But please confirm the release.
Thanks
-Nagu
=AmfDemo2,safSi=AmfDemo1,safApp=AmfDemo2
saAmfSISUHAState=ACTIVE(1)
Here safSi=AmfDemo,safApp=AmfDemo2 only has Standby assignment with no Act.
Thanks
-Nagu
-Original Message-
From: Alex Jones [mailto:ajo...@genband.com]
Sent: 25 October 2014 00:33
To: Nagendra Kumar; Hans
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_imm.c | 101 +
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_utils.c | 14 +++-
2 files changed, 87 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
Attempting to change saPlmDependency returns SA_AIS_ERR_BAD_OPERATION.
The code forbids modifying
(indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset 3cb7fd545a9ded536b48acdfb5e4eb8717811099
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 15:37:26 -0400
plm: allow dynamic modification of saPlmDependency [#1030]
Attempting
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
Same patch as before, but with extra log message removed.
changeset e713dc3adcbf158c8da1ee86d9a8632b93ad1fe0
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 11:10:41 -0500
plm: allow
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_epath_util.c | 2 +-
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_adm_fsm.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Symptoms of the problem include PLMS crashing, and the node resetting because of
the crash.
Valgrind shows memory
Mathi,
I am performing a PLM_ADMIN_RESET of the active controller.
The problem is that amfd on the active controller is forcing a failover
before the node left is received on the standby. This results in all
the core OpenSAF services on the standby failing at active assignment
because their
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset 46c53346ea5deab1e3cd5059c1c9f6ffeb40d76f
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2015 11:48:29 -0400
amfd: fix interaction with plm/clm for node left [#1264
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/clm.cc | 6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
When active controller is hard reset, standby reboots, too, because the OpenSAF
services all fail in active assignment because saImmOiClassImplementerSet fails.
When amfd on the active controller
Ack, not tested.
Alex
On 05/05/2015 02:47 AM, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu wrote:
Including Alex.
Mathi.
- anders.wid...@ericsson.com wrote:
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_hsm.c | 2 ++
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
The following warning was
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/hpi_intf/plms_hsm.c | 204 +++---
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_amf.c | 19 +--
2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 152 deletions(-)
Blade extraction does not work consistently. If you extract a blade, and AMF
should reject it (because
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
EXPLAIN/COMMENT THE PATCH SERIES HERE
changeset 1d5402442516a05d4ade8a4323796683128d1a83
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Tue, 02 Jun 2015 16:33:43 -0400
plm: fix blade
clm_node_exit_start finishes?
2. And then add the below code in avd_node_down_mw_susi_failover?
Alex
On 05/27/2015 09:09 AM, praveen malviya wrote:
On 27-May-15 2:58 AM, Alex Jones wrote:
Praveen/Nagu,
I'm seeing an issue where the node admin state is different
between
IMM and amfd. I
Guys,
I'm seeing a huge leak in cpnd. There is something very strange
with the released software, though. Here is the leak from the released
tar file (official 4.5.1.tar.gz and 4.6.0.tar.gz both have this):
cpnd_proc.c:272
send_evt.info.cpa.info.arr_msg.ckpt_data = NULL;
This
There a few inconsistencies here, I believe.
Firstly, we don't prevent an AMF node lock of the active controller, but
we do prevent a CLM node lock of the active controller. Why the difference?
Secondly, I'm also thinking of blade extraction as a use case here. If
the operator wants to
Disregard the first question. I realized after I hit the send button,
that AMF node lock doesn't affect the internal OpenSAF daemons.
But, I am still curious about the second.
Alex
On 07/23/2015 10:56 AM, Alex Jones wrote:
There a few inconsistencies here, I believe.
Firstly, we don't
Comments inline:
On 07/23/2015 12:41 PM, Mathivanan Naickan Palanivelu wrote:
Comments inline:
- ajo...@genband.com wrote:
osaf/services/saf/clmsv/clms/clms_plm.c | 12 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
At active controller switchover, the newly active
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset 94ecad7888f6dc9b0d609602c507b27873e902f8
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:13:04 -0400
plm: don't restart EE in opensaf_reboot
osaf/services/saf/amf/amfd/sg_npm_fsm.cc | 5 -
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
An N+M SU, with an active assignment, can also get a standby assignment at the
same time. Details for reproducing this are in the ticket.
The SUSI returned from avd_sg_npm_su_othr() is not
osaf/services/saf/clmsv/clms/clms_plm.c | 12 +---
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
At active controller switchover, the newly active sends node down events for
nodes that are not down.
There is a race condition on the standby between receiving the node_down
checkpoint
n
Comments (indicate scope for each y above):
-
changeset 7105a8f6ef5c0ba8928b66388058a852bb6e874c
Author: Alex Jones ajo...@genband.com
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:38:59 -0400
clmd: don't always checkpoint nodes in plm readiness
n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
-
<>
changeset 799bdb0e951ab07e9bc9f21ba20ffeaacb5c199c
Author: Alex Jones <ajo...@genband.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2015 12:31:00 -0400
lcknd: fix lock sync bug during
Other n
Comments (indicate scope for each "y" above):
-
<>
changeset 923566e6c96312c15330b4e8ed0c81a80a2701f0
Author: Alex Jones <ajo...@genband.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2015 12:56:53 -0400
ckptnd: fi
osaf/services/saf/cpsv/cpnd/cpnd_evt.c | 10 ++
1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
ckptnd core dumps with many different stack traces
When a collocated checkpoint replica is opened, and the active replica has large
numbers of sections (~200k), the sync from the active
osaf/services/saf/plmsv/plms/plms_he_pres_fsm.c | 6 ++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
When SA_PLM_ADMIN_DEACTIVATE is issued for an ATCA FRU, the HE presence
state gets stuck in SA_PLM_HE_PRESENCE_DEACTIVATING, and never transitions
to SA_PLM_HE_PRESENCE_INACTIVE.
The
1 - 100 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
