---
** [tickets:#833] MDS: possibility to change mds_tipc_prefix in runtime**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.5.FC
**Created:** Thu Apr 03, 2014 06:22 AM UTC by Hans Feldt
**Last Updated:** Thu Apr 03, 2014 06:22 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
Use case: TIPC still lacks name space support,
- **status**: unassigned -- assigned
- **assigned_to**: Praveen
- **Milestone**: future -- 4.3.3
---
** [tickets:#832] amf: In NoRed model no action taken on dependent when sponsor
gets unassigned**
**Status:** assigned
**Milestone:** 4.3.3
**Created:** Wed Apr 02, 2014 06:43 AM UTC by
- **status**: assigned -- review
---
** [tickets:#832] amf: In NoRed model no action taken on dependent when sponsor
gets unassigned**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.3.3
**Created:** Wed Apr 02, 2014 06:43 AM UTC by Praveen
**Last Updated:** Thu Apr 03, 2014 06:25 AM UTC
**Owner:**
Hi Hans, any comment ?
---
** [tickets:#807] AMF returns TRYAGAIN for saAmfRegister**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** future
**Created:** Thu Mar 06, 2014 03:52 PM UTC by Hans Feldt
**Last Updated:** Wed Apr 02, 2014 01:19 PM UTC
**Owner:** Nagendra Kumar
Use case: node lock followed by
Hi Hans ,
What would be the use case , running multiple insistence of Opensaf on A
single node ?
-AVM
On 4/3/2014 11:52 AM, Hans Feldt wrote:
*[tickets:#833] http://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/tickets/833/ MDS:
- **status**: assigned -- review
- **assigned_to**: Zoran Milinkovic
- **Comment**:
https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/mailman/message/32181188/
---
** [tickets:#834] IMM: Potential memory leak in immnd_evt_proc_ccb_compl_rsp()**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.3.3
**Created:** Thu Apr
changeset: 5099:484bd069b67a
user:Hans Feldt hans.fe...@ericsson.com
date:Thu Apr 03 06:55:48 2014 +0200
summary: amfd: remove cast from avd_class_impl_set [#713]
changeset: 5100:8d070ed277b8
user:Hans Feldt hans.fe...@ericsson.com
date:Thu Apr 03 06:55:49
Yes multiple instances on the same TIPC core that should not talk to/see each
other.
The change is trivial and is about to be tested.
/Hans
On 04/03/2014 10:07 AM, A V Mahesh wrote:
Hi Hans ,
What would be the use case , running multiple insistence of Opensaf on A
single node ?
-AVM
On
- **Comment**:
Backwards compatibility protection is needed when support for long DNs
is introduced in parts of OpenSAF.
The IMM will provide a guard for this through a new environment variable
IMMA_LONG_DN. This variable is expected to have the value of either 1 or 0,
where 1 means that long
Some things to consider to ensure 100% backwards compatibility:
* SA_AIS_NAME_TOO_LONG is not listed as a possbile error code for all affected
downcall APIs. So it might be better to use SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM to be 100%
compatible.
* The environment variable should probably also affect the
Yes I suppose those are valid points, particularly the second.
On the first point, there is still something to be said for getting
a very clear and specific error code for this new potential problem.
The error code SA_AIS_ERR_INVALID_PARAM is typically not handled
by any applications because it
Another thing to consider when introducing this new environment variable:
Maybe we should also let it affect how the RDN value is interpreted/presented
to the application. I.e. whether the RDN attribute name is included in the
value or not. So when the value is zero, the RDN attribute name is
---
** [tickets:#835] Imm: special applier delete callback is not sent when RT
object is deleted, and PBE is enabled**
**Status:** accepted
**Milestone:** 4.3.3
**Created:** Thu Apr 03, 2014 02:17 PM UTC by Neelakanta Reddy
**Last Updated:** Thu Apr 03, 2014 02:17 PM UTC
**Owner:**
- **status**: accepted -- review
- **Comment**:
https://sourceforge.net/p/opensaf/mailman/message/32182234/
---
** [tickets:#835] Imm: special applier delete callback is not sent when RT
object is deleted, and PBE is enabled**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.3.3
**Created:** Thu Apr 03,
- **Milestone**: future -- 4.5.FC
---
** [tickets:#775] cpsv :Iteration Next returns NO_SECTIONS **
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.5.FC
**Created:** Mon Feb 10, 2014 09:00 AM UTC by A V Mahesh (AVM)
**Last Updated:** Mon Feb 10, 2014 09:00 AM UTC
**Owner:** A V Mahesh (AVM)
If
- **Milestone**: future -- 4.5.FC
---
** [tickets:#776] cpsv: Write collocated ckpt fails with NOT_EXIST if tow
node opens ckpt simultaneously **
**Status:** assigned
**Milestone:** 4.5.FC
**Created:** Mon Feb 10, 2014 09:07 AM UTC by A V Mahesh (AVM)
**Last Updated:** Mon Feb 10, 2014
- **Milestone**: future -- 4.5.FC
---
** [tickets:#745] ckpt retention duration set continuously timesout**
**Status:** unassigned
**Milestone:** 4.5.FC
**Created:** Fri Jan 24, 2014 09:36 AM UTC by Sirisha Alla
**Last Updated:** Fri Jan 24, 2014 09:36 AM UTC
**Owner:** nobody
The issue is
- **Priority**: minor -- major
---
** [tickets:#835] Imm: special applier delete callback is not sent when RT
object is deleted, and PBE is enabled**
**Status:** review
**Milestone:** 4.4.1
**Created:** Thu Apr 03, 2014 02:17 PM UTC by Neelakanta Reddy
**Last Updated:** Fri Apr 04, 2014
18 matches
Mail list logo