Note that when considering the performance for protocol alternatives
there are two
different metrics to consider: Throughput and latency.
Loading time is all about throughput.
If loading-times/thoughput are identical for TCP and TIPC (all else
being equal) then
it may be either because TCP and
Hi William,
On 7/25/2014 12:53 AM, William R Elliott wrote:
On the other hand, they have concerns about TCP because of the performance.
[AVM] If you consider the latest default Opnesaf branch ( upcoming
4.5 release ) ,more or less the performance is the same.
Can someone point me towards
*To:* opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net; William R Elliott
*Subject:* Re: [users] Questions about using TCP verses TIPC with opensaf
Hi William,
On 7/25/2014 12:53 AM, William R Elliott wrote:
On the other hand, they have concerns about TCP because of the
performance.
[AVM
-0337 |--www.NetCracker.com--
Proven Partner to Communications Service Providers
From: A V Mahesh [mailto:mahesh.va...@oracle.com]
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2014 1:07 AM
To: opensaf-users@lists.sourceforge.net; William R Elliott
Subject: Re: [users] Questions about using TCP verses TIPC with opensaf
Hi
