[opensc-devel] [WINDOWS] Request for help producing a new installer

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, I have been working to allow complete cross-compile of all OpenSC SCB components for Windows using MinGW. There are a lot of advantages in using MinGW for building Open Source application for Windows, the most important is that it enables projects to maintain *ONE* build system for all pla

[opensc-devel] some build questions about OpenSC/pam_pkcs11 module

2008-03-20 Thread Huie-Ying Lee
Hi, I'm a Solaris engineer at Sun Micros. We have been working on porting the OpenSC/pam_pkcs11 module, version 0.6.0, to Solaris. During the porting, I encountered a couple of build issues and I would appreciate if you can help me with them. Q1: According to the configure.in file, the defa

[opensc-devel] [CSP11] MinGW build and lots of fixups

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, I've created MinGW based build for csp11. I've found some issue, especially regarding unicode and unsigned handling (unsigned < 0). Most should be corrected, but I have no way to test this. Branch at [1]. Diff at [2]. Tarball at [3]. A lot of other warnings an potential errors still exis

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/20/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > On 3/20/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I also agree this "standard" file should not be modified. > >> > >> I overlooked the changes when I made the commit. What w

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Paljak
On Mar 20, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 3/20/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I also agree this "standard" file should not be modified. >> >> I overlooked the changes when I made the commit. What would be the >> correct way to have these defines? > > First of all I

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/20/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also agree this "standard" file should not be modified. > > I overlooked the changes when I made the commit. What would be the > correct way to have these defines? First of all I don't understand wether the GOST is something that is sp

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2007-December/010617.html > > r3304 | ludovic.rousseau | 2007-12-17 15:39:20 +020

Re: [opensc-devel] eToken AKS support

2008-03-20 Thread Dmitry Zhigulin
Hi Nils! Nils Larsch gmx.net> writes: >this is most likely a HMAC (using DES or 3DES) > unless secure messaging is used when the key is written to the > token a usb sniffer might be useful to get the key I explore eToken stick files, but whith file is DES key? I don't found 7 byte (DES) or 21 b

[opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2007-December/010617.html r3304 | ludovic.rousseau | 2007-12-17 15:39:20 +0200 (Mon, 17 Dec 2007) | 5 lines add support of ruToken Thanks to Andrew V. Stepanov for

Re: [opensc-devel] [TEST REQUEST] libp11, engine_pkcs11, openct - New build systems

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Jean, Eddy: can you please check it on your side? Thanks! On 3/15/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > To make it easier to test for none svn users, here are tarballs: > http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/libp11-0.2.3-svn.tar.gz > http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/engine_pkcs11-0.1.4-