Hi
I just tested [2] and it works. Thanks!
- Thomas
On Wed, 6 Jul 2011, Martin Paljak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Here's an alternative approach [1]: requiring that sc_select_file
> invocations would explicitly be successful for continuing.
>
> Does this work for you? To be honest the binding procedu
Le 6 juillet 2011 12:24, Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE a écrit :
> Thanks for the link to libusb.
I think you already know this [3] page about libusb.
>> Which ones? Please pinpoint the actual mail or missing commits in the
>> log.
>
> I am not pointing out missing commits
> but only asking if you t
Hello,
Here's an alternative approach [1]: requiring that sc_select_file
invocations would explicitly be successful for continuing.
Does this work for you? To be honest the binding procedure could be
improved further, it is somewhat difficult to follow.
Look for builds with commit ID
9bcda91808
Hello,
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 22:13, Frank Morgner
wrote:
> Hi!
>
>> sc_enum_apps fails because sc_select_file returns an "unknown" SW 6A88
>> which gets translated to SC_ERROR_DATA_OBJECT_NOT_FOUND in iso7816.c.
>> Looking at ISO7816-4, it is not listed as a "relevant SW" for SELECT
>> command
Hello,
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 13:39, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 06/09/2011 09:24 PM, Martin Paljak wrote:
>> The situation I'd like to create is where there are, in fact, several
>> virtual "forks" of OpenSC inside OpenSC project itself (how meta!).
>> Be it a "fork" for every developer (now also c
Thanks for the link to libusb.
> Which ones? Please pinpoint the actual mail or missing commits in the
> log.
I am not pointing out missing commits
but only asking if you took into account Ludovic Rousseau fixes.
I guess this is the case.
For example:
Thu, 23 Jun 2011
https://github.com/Lud
Hello,
2011/7/6 Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE :
> Le mercredi 06 juillet 2011 à 08:38 +0300, Martin Paljak a écrit :
>> > I have been playing with RC1 during an hour and I am not perfectly
>> sure
>> > that all interactions between libusb, pcsc-lite and opensc are
>> perfect.
>> Could you be *specific
Hello,
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 00:41, Juan Antonio Martinez wrote:
> Playing with OpenDNIe on MacOSX 10.6 I found a nasty ¿bug?¿feature?:
> Once the PIN is entered, the keychain layer remembers it forever :-(
>
> By mean of a friend's report I found this link:
>
> http://lists.apple.com/archives/a
Le mercredi 06 juillet 2011 à 08:38 +0300, Martin Paljak a écrit :
> > I have been playing with RC1 during an hour and I am not perfectly
> sure
> > that all interactions between libusb, pcsc-lite and opensc are
> perfect.
> Could you be *specific* please?
* libusb is broken, a patch was submitte