On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 16:35 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 03:50 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
> >> On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> >>> Hello Jean-Pierre,
> >>>
> >>> SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERIFY_RC_COUN
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:31 +0200, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:45 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:37, Andre Zepezauer
> > wrote:
> > >> More elegant indeed. Some nice documentation about the real meaning of
> > >> the flag would
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:45 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:37, Andre Zepezauer
> wrote:
> >> More elegant indeed. Some nice documentation about the real meaning of the
> >> flag would also be nice. "most cards do almost ISO" to support pinpads.
> >> But not
Le 08/06/2011 16:41, Andre Zepezauer a écrit :
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 16:35 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
>> On 06/08/2011 03:50 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> Hello Jean-Pie
On 06/08/2011 04:41 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 16:35 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
>> On 06/08/2011 03:50 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> Hello Jean-Pie
Hello,
On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 17:37, Andre Zepezauer
wrote:
>> More elegant indeed. Some nice documentation about the real meaning of the
>> flag would also be nice. "most cards do almost ISO" to support pinpads.
>> But not all support the status query...
>
> Maybe I'm wrong, but IMO Viktor had
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 16:35 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
> On 06/08/2011 03:50 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
> >> On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> >>> Hello Jean-Pierre,
> >>>
> >>> SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERIFY_RC_COUN
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 17:01 +0300, Martin Paljak wrote:
> Hello,
> On Jun 8, 2011, at 16:50 , Andre Zepezauer wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
> >> On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> >>> Hello Jean-Pierre,
> >>>
> >>> SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERI
On 06/08/2011 03:50 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
>> On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
>>> Hello Jean-Pierre,
>>>
>>> SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERIFY_RC_COUNTER doesn't correspond to any flag
>>> defined in PKCS#15. Furthermore, th
On Jun 8, 2011, at 17:01 , Martin Paljak wrote:
>
> Some nice documentation about the real meaning of the flag would also be
> nice. "most cards do almost ISO" to support pinpads. But not all support the
> status query...
This is important to stop the flags from spreading unintentionally to fut
Hello,
On Jun 8, 2011, at 16:50 , Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
>> On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
>>> Hello Jean-Pierre,
>>>
>>> SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERIFY_RC_COUNTER doesn't correspond to any flag
>>> defined in PKCS#15. Fur
On Wed, 2011-06-08 at 11:50 +0200, Jean-Pierre Szikora wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> > Hello Jean-Pierre,
> >
> > SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERIFY_RC_COUNTER doesn't correspond to any flag
> > defined in PKCS#15. Furthermore, the capability to modify the return
> > code of the
On 06/07/2011 03:17 PM, Andre Zepezauer wrote:
> Hello Jean-Pierre,
>
> SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERIFY_RC_COUNTER doesn't correspond to any flag
> defined in PKCS#15. Furthermore, the capability to modify the return
> code of the VERIFY command is not specific to PKCS#15.
>
> Why not using a different a
Hi Andre,
You're right. My first idea is set this verifyRC feature through the
cardos.profile file. But by checking for the package installation, we don't
even need for a switch. I will revert this patch tomorrow.
Cheers,
Jean-Pierre
Le 7 juin 2011 à 15:17, Andre Zepezauer a écrit :
> Hello
Hello Jean-Pierre,
SC_PKCS15_PIN_FLAG_VERIFY_RC_COUNTER doesn't correspond to any flag
defined in PKCS#15. Furthermore, the capability to modify the return
code of the VERIFY command is not specific to PKCS#15.
Why not using a different approach? In example it's possible to detect
the installed p
15 matches
Mail list logo