Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-25 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Committed at revision 3440. On Saturday 22 March 2008, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > Cleanup rutoken interface. > > During the mingw build efforts I had to invest much time in this module. > I believe there are many more issue with this module compliant to other OpenSC > components. > This is yet ano

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-22 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Cleanup rutoken interface. During the mingw build efforts I had to invest much time in this module. I believe there are many more issue with this module compliant to other OpenSC components. This is yet another cleanup, put rutoken signature to all exportable functions, and install proper header

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-21 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Move OpenSC PKCS#11 specific constants into own include files. Change constants to contain OPENSC signature, as these constant are not provider independent. Following: http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2007-December/010617.html Comments? svn diff -r 3435:3436 https://www.o

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/20/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mar 20, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > > On 3/20/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I also agree this "standard" file should not be modified. > >> > >> I overlooked the changes when I made the commit. What w

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Martin Paljak
On Mar 20, 2008, at 6:01 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > On 3/20/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I also agree this "standard" file should not be modified. >> >> I overlooked the changes when I made the commit. What would be the >> correct way to have these defines? > > First of all I

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 3/20/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I also agree this "standard" file should not be modified. > > I overlooked the changes when I made the commit. What would be the > correct way to have these defines? First of all I don't understand wether the GOST is something that is sp

Re: [opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 3:31 PM, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > > http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2007-December/010617.html > > r3304 | ludovic.rousseau | 2007-12-17 15:39:20 +020

[opensc-devel] ruToken and pkcs11.h modification

2008-03-20 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hello, http://www.opensc-project.org/pipermail/opensc-devel/2007-December/010617.html r3304 | ludovic.rousseau | 2007-12-17 15:39:20 +0200 (Mon, 17 Dec 2007) | 5 lines add support of ruToken Thanks to Andrew V. Stepanov for