Re: [opensc-devel] Sub-project for OpenSC with secure messaging and multi-applications

2010-06-08 Thread Martin Paljak
2010/4/30 Viktor TARASOV : > Martin Paljak wrote: >>> You mean to place 'light' (but fully functional) OpenSC into the applet ? >>> >> That would be a nice idea. But there's no (AFAIK) set standard or >> requirements (other than what I know from online signature plugin >> requirements in Estonia)

Re: [opensc-devel] Sub-project for OpenSC with secure messaging and multi-applications

2010-06-08 Thread resoli - libero
This thread is really interesting looking from an italian perspective. Viktor mentioned the fact that in Italian CNS card PIN and signature are secure messaging protected, as reported by Emanuele Pucciarelli that created also some patches[1] to support that cards in OpenSC. Unfortunately the sm 3

Re: [opensc-devel] Release procedure, why backport trunk to releases/opensc-0.11.14?

2010-06-08 Thread Martin Paljak
On Jun 7, 2010, at 13:18 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote: > I see a lot of efforts in SVN, merging OpenSC trunk into the branch > named releases/0.11.14. It is not merging trunk, it is picking critical and isolated bugs that have been fixed in trunk into the 0.11 tree, so that it could be a drop

Re: [opensc-devel] Release procedure, why backport trunk to releases/opensc-0.11.14?

2010-06-08 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
2010/6/8 Martin Paljak : > On Jun 7, 2010, at 13:18 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote: >> I don't know how 0.11.14 and 0.12.0 will co-exist in Debian SID or any >> other GNU/Linux distribution. If they do, bravo! After having to explain >> how to remove OpenCT, now I will have to explain Gooze user