Re: [opensc-devel] RV: CSP-Pkcs11 howto?

2011-04-04 Thread Martin Paljak
Hello, On Apr 3, 2011, at 02:16 , Peter Stuge wrote: > Douglas E. Engert wrote: >> can run the opensc-cardmod.dll mini-driver > > Request fixing this filename. Suggest opensc-minidriver.dll instead. Yes, a sensible thing to do. I already changed the name of the actually installed file to opensc

Re: [opensc-devel] Windows building and MSI

2011-04-04 Thread Martin Paljak
Hello, On Apr 1, 2011, at 20:02 , Martin Paljak wrote: > Windows7 build machine is currently offline but will be brought back online > for next week and onwards (have a look at how upgrading to Windows SP1 went: > http://martinpaljak.net/windowswtf.png ) Done, a fresh VM is up and running and th

Re: [opensc-devel] Windows building and MSI

2011-04-04 Thread Peter Stuge
Martin Paljak wrote: > > * File versioning. Current .rc uses the libtool related version in the file > > versioning which is not optimal. It has to my knowledge no relation to the > > libtool interface versioning. Versions from OpenSC version and SVN revision > > could be used instead. 0.12.1.52

Re: [opensc-devel] Windows building and MSI

2011-04-04 Thread Viktor TARASOV
Le 04/04/2011 10:28, Martin Paljak a écrit : > On Apr 1, 2011, at 20:02 , Martin Paljak wrote: >> * Installation location. The distributed DLL-s should IMO go to Windows >> folder. The three files that should go to system32 or equivalent are: >> * opensc.dll - does not pollute nor should it conf

Re: [opensc-devel] Windows building and MSI

2011-04-04 Thread Martin Paljak
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:47 , Viktor TARASOV wrote: > Le 04/04/2011 10:28, Martin Paljak a écrit : >> On Apr 1, 2011, at 20:02 , Martin Paljak wrote: >>> * Installation location. The distributed DLL-s should IMO go to Windows >>> folder. The three files that should go to system32 or equivalent are:

Re: [opensc-devel] Windows building and MSI

2011-04-04 Thread Martin Paljak
On Apr 4, 2011, at 11:39 , Peter Stuge wrote: > Martin Paljak wrote: >>> * File versioning. Current .rc uses the libtool related version in the file >>> versioning which is not optimal. It has to my knowledge no relation to the >>> libtool interface versioning. Versions from OpenSC version and

Re: [opensc-devel] Cardmod: classic form for the container's ID

2011-04-04 Thread Viktor TARASOV
Le 30/03/2011 18:38, Viktor TARASOV a écrit : > What would you say if we accept the 'classic' GUID form as a default one, > and give the possibility to define its own format to the pkcs15 card driver ? > A new sc_pkcs15_operations callback will be used: > http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/browse

Re: [opensc-devel] Windows building and MSI

2011-04-04 Thread Peter Stuge
Martin Paljak wrote: > The way I understand it, opensc-pkcs11.dll (and other DLL-s) > resources should contain the version of the overall OpenSC package > for visual inspection, not what libtool thinks is the "interface > level". This is actually what libusb-1.0 does too. //Peter ___

[opensc-devel] Locked Smart Cards

2011-04-04 Thread Brian Thomas
Hello, I am using Athena ASE smart cards for Windows OS Logon which are initialized with PKCS-15. I am using OpenSC version 12. During testing our engineers have to sometimes have to completely erase and reinitialize a card. The problem is that several of these smart cards are turning up wit

Re: [opensc-devel] fixes for a few glitches in card-opengpg.c

2011-04-04 Thread Peter Marschall
Hi, Based on Martin Paljak's feedback I have overhauled & extended my patch series for card-openpgp.c This version of the patch series has been tested for compatibility with a OpenPGP card 1.1: * with my opensc-explorer patches (included into mainline recently by Martin [thank you, BTW]), th

Re: [opensc-devel] Locked Smart Cards

2011-04-04 Thread Toni Sjoblom - Aventra
Hi, I’m not familiar with the card in question, but usually a card’s PIN have a corresponding PUK code that is used to unlock the PIN. At least this is the way the MyEID cards work. You can use the OpenSC pkcs15 tools to unlock a PIN code. Kind regards, Toni From: opensc-devel-boun.

Re: [opensc-devel] Cardmod: classic form for the container's ID

2011-04-04 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 4/4/2011 4:09 AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote: > Le 30/03/2011 18:38, Viktor TARASOV a écrit : >> What would you say if we accept the 'classic' GUID form as a default one, >> and give the possibility to define its own format to the pkcs15 card driver ? >> A new sc_pkcs15_operations callback will be u

[opensc-devel] OpenSC with cardmod MSI

2011-04-04 Thread Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE
Dear friends, Are there builds available of OpenSC with cardmod for testing? Kind regards, -- Jean-Michel Pouré - Gooze - http://www.gooze.eu ___ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-proje

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC with cardmod MSI

2011-04-04 Thread Martin Paljak
On Apr 4, 2011, at 18:47 , Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote: > Are there builds available of OpenSC with cardmod for testing? With *minidriver*. Yes. But no documentation yet: https://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/wiki/NightlyBuilds ___ opensc-devel mai

Re: [opensc-devel] Cardmod: classic form for the container's ID

2011-04-04 Thread Viktor TARASOV
Le 04/04/2011 17:39, Douglas E. Engert a écrit : > On 4/4/2011 4:09 AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote: >> Le 30/03/2011 18:38, Viktor TARASOV a écrit : >>> What would you say if we accept the 'classic' GUID form as a default one, >>> and give the possibility to define its own format to the pkcs15 card drive

Re: [opensc-devel] Cardmod: classic form for the container's ID

2011-04-04 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 4/4/2011 11:58 AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote: > Le 04/04/2011 17:39, Douglas E. Engert a écrit : >> On 4/4/2011 4:09 AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote: >>> Le 30/03/2011 18:38, Viktor TARASOV a écrit : What would you say if we accept the 'classic' GUID form as a default one, and give the possibili