Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC in multi-thread

2011-09-09 Thread Martin Paljak
Hello, On 31/08/11 20:01, Viktor Tarasov wrote: > Hello, > > during the tests of minidriver on Windows Vista there was a problem related > to the using of OpenSC in multi-threads. > > SC context create/release are not thread safe -- they allocate/release memory > referenced by the pointers from

[opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.12.3 master plan

2011-09-09 Thread Martin Paljak
Hello, Autumn has started (at least in northern hemisphere) so it is time to pull together next OpenSC release. Things to do that should be cleaned up into hopefully self-contained patches: - secret key object signature (Viktor and Douglas have different signatures) [1] - secure messaging, at l

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC in multi-thread

2011-09-09 Thread Viktor Tarasov
Hello, Le 09/09/2011 09:23, Martin Paljak a écrit : > On 31/08/11 20:01, Viktor Tarasov wrote: >> during the tests of minidriver on Windows Vista there was a problem related >> to the using of OpenSC in multi-threads. >> >> SC context create/release are not thread safe -- they allocate/release

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.12.3 master plan

2011-09-09 Thread Viktor Tarasov
Le 09/09/2011 09:38, Martin Paljak a écrit : > Hello, > > Autumn has started (at least in northern hemisphere) so it is time to > pull together next OpenSC release. > > Things to do that should be cleaned up into hopefully self-contained > patches: > - secret key object signature (Viktor and Doug

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC in multi-thread

2011-09-09 Thread Martin Paljak
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:39, Viktor Tarasov wrote: > Le 09/09/2011 09:23, Martin Paljak a écrit : >> If we omit loadable modules, we could also take that ATR tables are >> indeed static and do not need to be released? Is this correct? > > Exact. > Only loadable module prevents the static ATR tabl

Re: [opensc-devel] ECDSA cards

2011-09-09 Thread Edward Middleton
On 09/06/2011 11:16 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote: > > > On 9/6/2011 6:21 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: >> Hello, >>I'm trying to use the opensc 0.12.x ECDSA support, to allow ECDSA >> signing in gnutls via PKCS #11. However I have no such cards to test it. >> Do you have any suggestion on

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.12.3 master plan

2011-09-09 Thread Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Martin Paljak wrote: > Hello, > Autumn has started (at least in northern hemisphere) so it is time to > pull together next OpenSC release. >  - ECDH support [5] Out of curiosity, are the ECDH static keys used anywhere? They remind me of the DH static keys ciphersui

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC in multi-thread

2011-09-09 Thread Viktor Tarasov
Le 09/09/2011 10:09, Martin Paljak a écrit : > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:39, Viktor Tarasov wrote: >> Le 09/09/2011 09:23, Martin Paljak a écrit : >>> If we omit loadable modules, we could also take that ATR tables are >>> indeed static and do not need to be released? Is this correct? >> Exact. >>

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC in multi-thread

2011-09-09 Thread Martin Paljak
On 09/09/11 11:32, Viktor Tarasov wrote: > Le 09/09/2011 10:09, Martin Paljak a écrit : >> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:39, Viktor >> Tarasov wrote: >>> Le 09/09/2011 09:23, Martin Paljak a écrit : If we omit loadable modules, we could also take that ATR tables are indeed static and do not

Re: [opensc-devel] ECDSA cards

2011-09-09 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 9/9/2011 2:46 AM, Edward Middleton wrote: On 09/06/2011 11:16 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote: On 9/6/2011 6:21 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: Hello, I'm trying to use the opensc 0.12.x ECDSA support, to allow ECDSA signing in gnutls via PKCS #11. However I have no such cards to test

Re: [opensc-devel] Minidriver in 'write' mode

2011-09-09 Thread Viktor Tarasov
Le 04/09/2011 21:43, Viktor Tarasov a écrit : > Le 01/09/2011 20:04, Martin Paljak a écrit : >> Hello, >> On Aug 29, 2011, at 7:53 , Viktor Tarasov wrote: >>> I committed the initial version of the minidriver in 'write' mode. >>> https://github.com/viktorTarasov/OpenSC/commits/minidriver-write-mode

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC in multi-thread

2011-09-09 Thread Viktor Tarasov
Le 09/09/2011 11:22, Martin Paljak a écrit : > On 09/09/11 11:32, Viktor Tarasov wrote: >> Le 09/09/2011 10:09, Martin Paljak a écrit : >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:39, Viktor >>> Tarasov wrote: Le 09/09/2011 09:23, Martin Paljak a écrit : > If we omit loadable modules, we could also ta

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.12.3 master plan

2011-09-09 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 9/9/2011 3:07 AM, Viktor Tarasov wrote: > Le 09/09/2011 09:38, Martin Paljak a écrit : >> Hello, >> >> Autumn has started (at least in northern hemisphere) so it is time to >> pull together next OpenSC release. >> >> Things to do that should be cleaned up into hopefully self-contained >> patch

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.12.3 master plan

2011-09-09 Thread Viktor Tarasov
Le 09/09/2011 17:05, Douglas E. Engert a écrit : > > On 9/9/2011 3:07 AM, Viktor Tarasov wrote: >> Le 09/09/2011 09:38, Martin Paljak a écrit : >>> Hello, >>> >>> Autumn has started (at least in northern hemisphere) so it is time to >>> pull together next OpenSC release. >>> >>> Things to do that s

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.12.3 master plan

2011-09-09 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 9/9/2011 2:59 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Martin Paljak wrote: >> Hello, >> Autumn has started (at least in northern hemisphere) so it is time to >> pull together next OpenSC release. >> - ECDH support [5] > > Out of curiosity, are the ECDH static ke

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC 0.12.3 master plan

2011-09-09 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 9/9/2011 10:13 AM, Viktor Tarasov wrote: > Le 09/09/2011 17:05, Douglas E. Engert a écrit : >> >> On 9/9/2011 3:07 AM, Viktor Tarasov wrote: >>> Le 09/09/2011 09:38, Martin Paljak a écrit : Hello, Autumn has started (at least in northern hemisphere) so it is time to pull to

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC in multi-thread

2011-09-09 Thread Douglas E. Engert
On 9/9/2011 4:22 AM, Martin Paljak wrote: > On 09/09/11 11:32, Viktor Tarasov wrote: >> Le 09/09/2011 10:09, Martin Paljak a écrit : >>> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 10:39, Viktor >>> Tarasov wrote: Le 09/09/2011 09:23, Martin Paljak a écrit : > If we omit loadable modules, we could also tak