Thank you Ludovic,
I was waiting for this feature a long time, thank you for adding this feature.
I can confirm it works.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On 8/12/06, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello,
pcsc-lite [1] and my CCID driver [2] now support extended APDU out of
t
regarding the above.
---
Now, that I am about to be out of work :) I am also offering my help
in maintaining OpenSC PKCS#11 provider.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-p
But at least we should start to list the smartcard enabled [working]
applications.
With everyones help I doubt we will be running out of ideas how we can
make using smart cards easier on linux and elsewhere anytime soon :)
Sure!
This is why I am here.
Best
each software, describe what it does, link to it etc?
That would be great.
I sometime discover new smart card applications/programs (like the
pkcs11-helper from Alon Bar-Lev) that could have helped me.
Thanks!
But before we do, I think we need to define what is smartcard support...
There are qual
On 11/27/06, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
3. If the user removes and inserts his card, the application should
reprompt for PIN when private object is accessed.
4. If the user removes the card from one reader and insert it to
another reade
rtcard environment.
Most importantly, they need to UNDERSTAND what is considered to be
best practice.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
; accelerators and software keys all the same way - even if the HSM
> interface is not pkcs11
Well... You will have to implement a new middleware for this one, I
just think it is easier to implement PKCS#11 provider for devices,
than creating this generic middleware.
> Anyway... great work on
On Monday 27 November 2006 22:12, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Sure it does, it makes users crazy if you re-prompt them for
> > certificate that was already selected.
> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149673
> &g
the problem that plague the 'smartcard usability
with daily applications'.
That's a hell of a task
This is practicaly what I do... :)
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http:/
ls, like longer description, links to web page and friends,
> which features are available, cavets, such reviews for specific
> features and so on?
>
> or any other structure etc?
Following some some samples...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
Project: OpenVPN
Middleware: pkcs11-helper, pkcs
On Tuesday 28 November 2006 12:04, Christian Horn wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:35:30PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > 1. You don't expect application to require the user to store the
> > PIN hard coded in configuration file...
> > [...]
> > 3. If the user r
gards,
Alon Bar-Lev
---
--- opensc-0.11.1.org/configure.in 2006-05-31 00:04:47.0 +0300
+++ opensc-0.11.1/configure.in 2006-12-02 19:10:35.0 +0200
@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ AC_SUBST(OPENSC_LT_AGE)
AC_CANONICAL_HOST
AC_PROG_CC
+PKG_PROG_PKG_CONFIG
AC_C_BIGENDIAN
dnl Check for
On 12/6/06, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, Dec 06, 2006 at 08:27:05AM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> I've created a patch for Gentoo that enables disabling the linkage
> of pcsc-lite and openct, even if they are installed on system.
> It adds --disable-openc
Please consider adding version information in the file text,
so we can synchronize revisions.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
--- pkcs11.h.org2006-12-08 20:06:33.0 +0200
+++ pkcs11.h2006-12-08 19:33:31.0 +0200
@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
/* System dependencies. */
-#
On Friday 08 December 2006 20:20, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I've modified pkcs11-helper to use the new free pkcs11.h header.
> I was surprised that it went relatively OK, good work! :)
>
> Some modifications:
One more:
6. Cast CKR_VENDOR_DEFINED to ck_rv_t so compiler
On Friday 08 December 2006 20:28, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> On Friday 08 December 2006 20:20, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I've modified pkcs11-helper to use the new free pkcs11.h header.
> > I was surprised that it went relatively OK, good work! :)
> >
On 12/9/06, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, if it helps... commited to trunk, thanks! Can you have a look at
the wiki and document the options somewhere, if you find a fiting place?
Done!
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
bles/types changes the
copyright...
So I don't think that these reasons apply... :(
But it is your call... :)
The current state is good enough to be usable.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-pro
rovide a cleaner approach.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
No. Please don't do that!
I tried to use this new cmake in KDE for QCA.
It is horrible!
autoconf/automake is much better!
In stead of using a scripting engine, they reinvented the wheel, and
created the most complex definition language the could think of. Even
a simp
s are good test
case for a package compatibility... Compiling your package in so many
different environment helps in discovering issue you did not think of.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
htt
Hello Marcus,
One more minor modification.
Index: include/pkcs11-helper-1.0/pkcs11.h
===
--- include/pkcs11-helper-1.0/pkcs11.h (revision 36)
+++ include/pkcs11-helper-1.0/pkcs11.h (working copy)
@@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@
/* Syste
to integrate smartcard support correctly
into their applications.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
u have some argue with
providing people to freely use your products. I hope this will be
changed.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
opment interface... So the user ends up with multiple versions of
the same file...
I think that the simplest way is maintaiing it as a package... But we
had this discussion in the past, right? :)
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
e will be usable by all
the open source community as a standalone package which installs it at
include directory.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
Hello Andreas,
Why a daemon is required?
Can't the card transaction be used to sync between instances?
And if caching is required you can cache certificates by thumbprint at
user home...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On 3/6/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
to use local smartcard in order to open a session to remote HSM.
I was more concerned regarding the statement that locking and
multi-application cannot be implemented without a daemon component. It
sounds a bit strange as I know several providers which implement this.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev
TCP
socket, so this is a great way to solve the HSM issue as well... All
you need to expose is local PKCS#11 interface...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On 4/22/07, Clizio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Excuse me if I enter into this discussion. But, as the author of LSM-PKCS11,
I'd like t
t Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On 4/24/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Clizio,
I think spliting client and server is the right thing to go.
While I share Alons reservations when it comes to using
tcp/ip, I don't see a reason to not do that, if someone wants
to d
On 5/6/07, Nate Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> >> On 4/24/07, Nate Nielsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> BTW, I'm working on building a complete PKCS#11 provider for CAPI. So by
> >>> supporting PKCS#11 you&
On 5/8/07, Ph. Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello everbody!
>
> I seem to remember having read about a pkcs#11 forwarding driver, which allows
> to forward pkcs#11 calls eg. over a network - to use any pkcs#11 aware
> application (eg. firefox) with a smartcard being connected to another syste
On 5/9/07, Ph. Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That would be very good! If there's something I can help you with (eg.
> testing), just ask -- I'll try to reserve some time for you.
That's great!
> Do you have any implementation concepts/ideas? Or do you want start them here?
Yes... Some thoug
On 5/9/07, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, May 09, 2007 at 10:33:20PM +0300, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > 6. Haven't thoughts about slot events yet, don't know if I want to
> > support these in first version.
>
> I think it is important to do so. Be
On 5/9/07, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/openssh-pkcs11
>
> Yes, but that's not what I had in mind.
>
> SSH already secures and forwards ssh-agent communication. It would be
> more practical and possibly also more secure to have a proxy that
> looks l
I additions
will enbale PKCS#11 integration.
> Another option that works equally well is of course to teach
> ssh-agent PKCS#11.
This what I have done.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http
S?
BTW: We can shrink up the code if next version will use pkcs11-helper :)
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
n Bar-Lev.
On 6/11/07, Robert Relyea <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > On 6/11/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> This new version contains the patches from RedHat to use NSS instead
> >> of Open
Hello Ludovic,
Something is different with this version.
When I unlock xsession I see messages like:
Please insert smart card or enter user name
Must press
Smart card inserted
Must press
Welcome
Must press
This is very annoying...
What was changed?
On 6/11/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTEC
gainst the mappers.
But the current state requires too much work...
I regret to say, I don't have the time right now. I think that before
the NSS additions, I could have cleaned up the code faster...
Sorry,
Alon Bar-Lev.
On 6/12/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> O
ain, then see
if we can improve it.
1. If people wish to use NSS or OpenSSL there should be a clear
abstraction for this.
2. Use the pkcs11_lib in all package modules, including tools.
3. If we wish to use multi-provider we should get rid of the slot
stuff, and enumerate available objects, check each
The context handle is now completely opaque, so you are free to store
> >> anything you need for pkcs11_helper there.
> >
> > Yes. This was done correctly, but the pkcs11_lib is not used by the
> > whole package... The standalone utilities implement stuff of their
On 7/2/07, Bud P. Bruegger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Alon,
>
> have you already made progress in the implementation? I was very
> interested in this since I'd like to write some non-traditional pkcs#11
> module and I'd prefer to do that in python... I was wondering whether
> the forwarding
On 7/2/07, Jim Rees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We do something like this to translate kerberos tickets into cert/key usable
> from pkcs11. But it only makes sense if you have some way to convince the
> CA that it should sign the keypair and issue a cert. In our case that's
> kerberos. Otherwis
Hello Andreas,
On 7/17/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OpenSC - new version 0.11.3
In next version, can you please add --enable-plugin so that the plugin
will be built/installed only if requested?
I don't see many people using it, and the libassuan, pinentry
dependency can be
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> if you don't have libassuan installed, then opensc should compile
> fine (and not create the plugin). does that work for you?
Yes it does.
But if I have gnupg install, I already have libassuan, it does not
suggest I want to use it with O
atted by Athena proprietary drivers.
Can anyone help me?
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
---
$ pkcs15-init --reader 2 --profile asepcos+default --erase
--create-pkcs15 --verbose
Connecting to card in reader SCM SCR 335 (00) 00 00...
Using card driver Athena ASEPCOS.
About to erase card.
] sec.c:201:sc_pin_cmd: returning with: PIN code or key incorrect
[pkcs15-init] pkcs15-lib.c:3105:do_get_and_verify_secret: Failed to
verify PIN (ref=0x0)
Failed to create PKCS #15 meta structure: PIN code or key incorrect
Alon.
On 7/20/07, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
what happends if you run LIBASSUAN_CONFIG=/bin/false ./configure
?
Oh...
For now, I've used --with-libassuan-prefix=tmp
document this hack and good? very few people have the problem you mention
so I think it is good enough?
No...
Pl
On 7/20/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 20 July 2007 20:41:52 Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > No...
> > Please explicitly add --enable-nsplugin or something.
> > So that if you add dependency no additional hacks will be nessesery.
>
> ok. th
On 7/20/07, Nils Larsch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
could you send me the opensc debug log (including the APDUs
send to the card) ?
I guess you mean the attached?
If not, please send me some instructions.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[pkcs15-init] ctx.c:704:sc_context_
On 7/21/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 20 July 2007 22:17:00 Klaus Heinz wrote:
> > This is the same issue I have with openct and the automatic detection
> > of pcsc-lite. If it's possible to use openct without pcsc-lite and this
> > is a supported configuration I pr
On 8/8/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have the problem with automake 1.10
> $ ./autogen.sh
> + aclocal -I aclocal
> + libtoolize --copy --force --automake
> + autoheader --force
> + autoconf --force
> + automake-1.10 --add-missing --copy --force --foreign
> configure.in:198: re
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This patch works for me. Any objection to commit it?
After another quick look...
Some thoughts...
1. Rename configure.in into configure.ac
2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4?
The should be provided and m
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4?
> > The should be provided and maintained by the packages installed at
> > your system...
> > They should be removed from svn.
>
> Exact. I also suggested (and committ
But PKCS#11 is interactive API.
How do you suggest the response to be handled?
On 8/8/07, Ph. Marek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Alon!
>
> Another idea I just had ...
> If the forwarding driver supports serializing the PKCS#11-commands, how about
> spooling them into some file, and replaying
On 8/9/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any other comment?
No... :)
There are just too many weird things in configure...
I am afraid to touch...
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lis
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> would be nice to get this working, but we need to set LTLIBLTDL or similar
> (or adjust the autoconf makefiles - I prefer not setting LIBS so we can
> add -lltdl only where needed and not on a global scale).
Attached.
> also we need to
> c
On Friday 10 August 2007, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > 2. Why do you store the following: aclocal/pkg.m4, aclocal/libassuan.m4?
> > The should be provided and maintained by the packages installed at
> > your system...
>
> I don't want to force people into installing libassuan-dev. they would if
On 8/14/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/08/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I added the _CFLAGS variable whever the ltdl.h file is searched so it will
> > be
> > found and added back the libassuan.m4 file, as I think without we will annoy
> > quite a n
On 8/14/07, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thanks Alon and Ludovic!
>
> I added the _CFLAGS variable whever the ltdl.h file is searched so it will be
> found and added back the libassuan.m4 file, as I think without we will annoy
> quite a number of users (it hit already two active
you issue X.509 certificate on one authentication event, why can't
you issue it for longer time?
I also don't understand who will trust this authentication CA...
As it much simpler to implement Kerberos with SPNEGO.
The temporary X.509 certificate surely should not be a formal way to
Strange!
I don't have this error.
Are you sure the slot id is correct?
Try pkcs11-tool --list-slots
Alon.
On 9/1/07, Gürer Özen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In our AKIS PKCS-15 setup, PrKDF and PuKDF files need CHV for read access.
> That is conformant to the RSA EID Conformance Profile Spec fi
On 11/8/07, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The first step is to make /usr/lib/pkcs11/opensc-pkcs11.so usable.
OK.
So do it the other way around...
Make the link in lib... :)
Alon.
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-pr
Hello,
This was supported once, then reverted (I don't know why).
I agree it is better to have this on $(libdir)/pkcs11, but why
not putting there the library itself?
Also please note that you need to use $(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/pkcs11 so that
libdir will be available also to 64bit.
So you need some
. Mount the filesystem (as user).
13. Create a file.
14. Unmount the filesystem.
15. Verify that the file is encrypted.
16. Mount the filesystem again.
17. You should be able to access the file after prompted for passphrase.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
_
On 1/23/08, Mariusz Krynski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some time ago i started implementing ec in opensc (for my
> opencryptotoken project) - patch is there:
> http://code.google.com/p/opencryptotoken/downloads/list. It need a lot
> of work probably, but worked for me (it allows for client certi
base.
Any comments/recommendations will be appreciated.
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[1] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-trunk-mingw32-001.tar.bz2
[2] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
[3] http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/browser/branches/alonbl/mingw
On 2/1/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hey Alon, this sounds like a good deal! So I'm afraid I can't help with
> Winedoze and can't voice an opinion on that part...I didn't even knew that
> it requires MS compilers ;-)
Thanks!
You can check if the new tarball compiles
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It took some effort, but at the end I have a test release that uses a
> single autoconf/automake/libtool build system for all operating
> systems.
Forgot to describe how to build for Windows...
I build using cross compile on L
On 2/2/08, Douglas E. Engert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why? Using the vendor's compiler is common on many platforms,
> especially if your code is in the kernel, or is security
> related, like OpenSC and runs with operating system privileges.
I disagree completely, and believe the other way arou
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When I think about it now, a system_xyz.c file (much like pcsc-lite)
> with direct wrappers for win32 api would be a better choice than
> 'require libtool on windows'.
I think so too...
Thanks!
___
op
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure that OpenSC and the primary interface (PKCS#11) is
> actually executed with system privileges
> unless you use it in tandem of some system-privileges software (like
> CSP11 for example)
CSP also is loaded into the context of an app
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:11 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Using Manifests requires to be more dependent on Microsoft
> > technologies. Also it has nothing to do with security. A simpler
> > solution would be to create a ne
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi.
> On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Ludovic, I need some help in reader-pcsc:
>
> > 1. How can I detect if SCardControl is old or new? I am sure I can do
> > this by detecting some other
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:18 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
>
> > On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Feb 2, 2008, at 12:26 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > Yes. I don'
On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now I get why I don't receive your mails correctly.. You are using HTML mail...
Thanks for the info.
> (BTW, Sun, AIX and others do have the gcc compiler so I don't see a problem
> here, except that one can build it on Linux)
MinG
On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> However if there are enough builders and developers for the MS platform and
> it works better with MS compiler etc. then why not? But if nobody maintains
> the code within reasonable time, I prefer to rely on MinGW or other OSS
> to
On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Now I get why I don't receive your mails correctly.. You are using HTML
>> mail...
>
> Well, yes, TB has that "feature" ;-)
> ...what's wrong with that?
Will I keep getting your quotes incorrect, and some other parts are corrupt.
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 5. No version and other resources for DLLs and EXEs, it may be added
> in future if important.
Finished with this one.
The only noticeable change is the lack of manifests as mingw does not
support
On 2/2/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The only active system I know where pcsc-lite has less arguments is on
> > Mac OS X Tiger currently. On Linux I believe most up to date
> > distributions ship with a newer pcsc-lite. There are some but very-
> > v
On 2/1/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Windows binaries are available at [1], source tarball is available at [2].
As far as I know this should work. I need people to test this.
Updated binaries and source are available for testing, include totally
dynamic pcsc support, and
Done.
Thanks.
On 2/2/08, Martin Paljak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2008, at 8:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Added internal-winscard with minimum contents.
> >branches/alonbl/mingw/src/libopensc/part10.h
> >
>
> You could merge part10.h into the internal header as well. It is t
On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Testing the proposed opensc from
> http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
>
> Configure works on ML-5 (StartCom MultiMedia) with ./configure
> --enable-openct --enable-pcsc-lite --enable-nsplugin, however PCS
On 2/3/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Testing the proposed opensc from
> > http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
> >
> > Configure works o
On 2/3/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > When I think about it now, a system_xyz.c file (much like pcsc-lite)
> > with direct wrappers for win32 api would be a better choice than
> > 'require libtool on windows'.
>
> That would be a reimplementation of libltdl, wouldn't be?
>
> I
Thanks!
Do you actually don't have readline? Or is it an error?
Alon.
On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, builds perfect on StartCom MultiMedia 5 and StartCom Enterprise 5
> (RHEL). On ML5 all options are enabled:
>
> Host:i686-pc-linux-gnu
>
On 2/3/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Actually I didn't knew that there is such a flag now...of course there is
> readline, will try it with it next time ;-)
It should had been autodetected...
Next time, please send me the config.log too, so I know what is wrong.
Al
le at [2], svn
trunk at [3].
Best Regards,
Alon Bar-Lev.
[1] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-trunk-mingw32-002.tar.bz2
[2] http://alon.barlev.googlepages.com/opensc-0.11.4-svn.tar.gz
[3] http://www.opensc-project.org/opensc/browser/branches/alonbl/
On 2/4/08, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> most important for me would be: can the resultung binary be used with CSPs?
The result binary is a standard PKCS#11... So it should work... :)
BTW: Why didn't you enabled the selection of the PKCS#11 library of
the CSP11 to be configurab
On 2/5/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I think it is far more comfortable for users to have
> AM_MAINTAINER_MODE. I found a page [1] with some pros and cons.
>
> bye
>
> [1] http://htmlhelp.dotsrc.org/page.php/automake/automake_143.html
>
Well... I fully agree with [1]... There
On 2/5/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And that will fail if you to not have automake/autoconf installed or
> with the correct versions.
True.
>
> It is enough to do a "touch Makefile.am" to trigger the rebuild rule.
Right... You should not do this...
> I remember having probl
Done.
On 2/5/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 5, 2008 2:05 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Revision: 3350
> > Author: alonbl
> > Date: 2008-02-05 13:05:47 + (Tue, 05 Feb 2008)
> >
> > Log Message:
> > ---
> > Add opensc-tool --info, print version and c
On Feb 5, 2008 9:02 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 5. Februar 2008 13:43:58 schrieb Alon Bar-Lev:
> > On 2/4/08, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > most important for me would be: can the resultung binary be use
On 2/7/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Feb 6, 2008 1:44 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Revision: 3367
> > Author: alonbl
> > Date: 2008-02-06 12:44:11 + (Wed, 06 Feb 2008)
> >
> > Log Message:
> > ---
> > Add util_ prefix to util module, avoid symbol conf
On 2/7/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Alon and others,
>
> I (try to) use the opensc/branches/alonbl/mingw/ branch and I can't
> compile it any more :-)
>
>
> Maybe the default could be to compile _without_ generating the man pages.
>
Hi!
If you build from "make dist"
Just checked out a new solution...
I hope you will be happy with it.
It detects svn checkout and defaults man to disabled.
Alon.
On 2/7/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/7/08, Ludovic Rousseau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hello Alon and others,
>
On 2/6/08, Peter Stuge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 10:00:48PM +0200, Alon Bar-Lev wrote:
> > > well, itis more about which libraries the dll depends on. don't
> > > know too much about mingw, and if they are 99.9% compatible or
> > &g
On 2/4/08, Alon Bar-Lev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> If you are Windows OpenSC user, I need your help!
>
> I've modified the OpenSC build to use alternative compiler for
> Windows. I need acknowledgment that it works the same as always.
>
> I will be
Hello,
Decided to rework this.
Now when svn checkout, the xsl-stylesheets will be downloaded from upstream.
No system dependency is needed.
As we are already depended on online connection for "make dist", I
believe this is the simplest solution.
What do you think?
Alon.
On 2/7/08, Al
1 - 100 of 644 matches
Mail list logo
