I'm debating whether to submit a pull request on github with patches to
reduce gcc's warnings to a minimum (actually, completely eliminated.)
However, the patches violate the coding rules by marking unused
parameters in static functions -- the "marking" is very explicit and
very visible.
I also to
On 9/21/2012 12:40 AM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> Hello,
>
> 2012/9/20 B. Scott Michel :
>> I'm debating whether to submit a pull request on github with patches to
>> reduce gcc's warnings to a minimum (actually, completely eliminated.)
>> However, the patche
On 9/22/2012 12:04 AM, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>
> > Do not "fix" unused param warnings. The correct way to fix them is to
> > remove the parameter.
>
> Well, with c style object orientation we have interfaces that all card
> drivers must implement, even if they don't use all function parameter
On 10/14/2012 5:27 AM, Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> 2012/10/2 Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE :
>> Hello,
>>
>> I have some problems building Mac OS X packages on the farm.
>> This is Mac OS X 10.6 (SnowLeopard) and OpenSC git.
>>
>> Can you help?
> On my Snow Leopard system with up to date version of OpenS
Could solve the problem two ways:
#define SC_MAX_CARD_DRIVERS
(sizeof(internal_card_drivers)/sizeof(internal_card_drivers[0]))
or detect the end of the array by the null card driver name pointer.
Either way, you don't need a magic constant for the size of the array,
which is also fairly dangerous
