On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:33 AM, Jeff Ames jeffa...@gmail.com wrote:
...
For a non-shared module, is there a functional difference between
Initialise and AddRegion? Likewise with RemoveRegion and Close.
Registration happens in Initialise, so when the AddRegion call happens, all the
modules are
My apologies for thread-jacking...
I just want to be clear I didn't propose it because I came later and
decided I didn't like UK spelling. I am Canadian and historically
Canadians have used UK spelling.
I proposed it for the same reason (US) English is the standard
language of all things
I need to confess that the first time I saw horizons beeing used in OpenSim
was by Cristina and I did a big mistake, erasing her panels. Trying to
compensate this, I am presenting, for download, some horizons that an old
friend, an artist from UK (S. Nectar) made, some years ago, for
On that page it did use to say we used UK spelling, but that seems to have got
lost through time.
On this whole subject I do think we should stay with Uk spelling, but I don't
see it as that big a deal, if we all decide to swap to US spellings then so be
it.
But I don't agree that US
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 12:56 PM, Teravus Ovares tera...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm.. whenever someone brings up an issue of common
standards, professionalism, code quality, and cooperation, I get
suspitious.. what might he 'really' be trying to do? *cough*..
anyway.
Software Engineering?
Or we can use either '2' or '5' instead of 'Z' and 'S' .
'2' being closer to Z. And '5' being closer to S.
So maybe we should vote on if it should be 2 or 5 we use.
Teravus Ovares tera...@gmail.com wrote: Lets make purposeful mispellings..
like website addresses.. so that
when people
As this thread has been thoroughly hijacked, I guess there aren't any
further relevant (um, I meant technical) problems with the proposal?
Cheers,
Homer
___
Opensim-dev mailing list
Opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de
MW wrote:
Yeah I wasn't really being serious that we should try to get as many spelling
systems or langauges as we can.
So I do agree that it would be best to have one, but its hard to force people
to use one system if that is different to what they are used to. Its just
natural to spell
2009/1/25 Brianna wwwe...@gmail.com
We will add New World, Olish Newman, this weekend and another well built
node this coming week.
Bri
Hi all ! :D
As we talked with Bri we were happy to put an Hypergrid node somewhere for
New World Grid, but our time have been insufficient for this as
Homer Horwitz wrote:
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:13 PM, Justin Clark-Casey
jjusti...@googlemail.com wrote:
Could you wait a couple more days on this? I don't really have the
opportunity to give this the attention that it
deserves today (Sunday) and I may not be around at all tomorrow but I
actually should we wait a while and get more reaction. As this is going to
effect anyone who has a module that isn't in trunk. Seems a lot of hasle for
such a small thing.
Would seem better to wait and make the change when/if we change to homer's new
module interface.
MW
MW wrote:
actually should we wait a while and get more reaction. As this is going to
effect anyone who has a module that isn't in trunk. Seems a lot of hasle for
such a small thing.
Would seem better to wait and make the change when/if we change to homer's
new module interface.
Yes,
Hi guys,
I've been somewhat distracted lately getting ModRex up and running that I
haven't had time to finish the conversion process I started back in November
from the IClientAPI interfaces to IClientCore ones. I would like to see if we
can get some additional people in writing patches to add
Jeff Ames wrote:
Hello,
There are a few dusty corners in trunk from before
forge.opensimulator.org was up, but I was wondering about moving them
over, or merging them with core.
* OpenSim/Tools/LaunchSLClient
Can this be merged with the SL Launcher project on forge?
I always saw it as that when a developer or someone marked a ticket as
resolved it meant they made an attempt to resolve this item and that the
filer needs to test it and either close the ticket or re-open back to a true
bug status, and only the reporter should close the ticket, that is until a
Hello,
One possible source of confusion is that the OpenSim wiki says Please leave
closing of bugs to core team. A closed bug means we think it's gone forever,
or the bug report is invalid. (http://opensimulator.org/wiki/Bugs) That may
explain why lots of issues remain in the resolved state. Is
Ok, so I suggest we establish an 0.7 roadmap page. With that one as a
'definite', not a 'discussion'.Best regards,Stefan AnderssonTribal Media AB
Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 15:27:29 -0500 From: sda...@gmail.com To:
opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de Subject: Re: [Opensim-dev] Proposal for a
17 matches
Mail list logo
