Nebadon Izumi wrote:
I always saw it as that when a developer or someone marked a ticket as
resolved it meant they made an attempt to resolve this item and that the
filer needs to test it and either close the ticket or re-open back to a
true bug status, and only the reporter should close
I can certainly appreciate the problem of abandoned mantii - most of them
are. I think what caught me off-guard here is idb and I were actively
working the issue - and without me knowing the ticket would be resolved as
it was (automatically) it gave a certain appearance that did not reflect
well
Hi,
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:47:14 -0600
James Stallings II james.stalli...@gmail.com wrote:
suppose instead of setting the ticket to 'resolved' and closing it,
we set it to 'resolution pending test' and leave it open
I don't think there's enough difference between resolved and
resolution
I always saw it as that when a developer or someone marked a ticket as
resolved it meant they made an attempt to resolve this item and that the
filer needs to test it and either close the ticket or re-open back to a true
bug status, and only the reporter should close the ticket, that is until a
Hello,
One possible source of confusion is that the OpenSim wiki says Please leave
closing of bugs to core team. A closed bug means we think it's gone forever,
or the bug report is invalid. (http://opensimulator.org/wiki/Bugs) That may
explain why lots of issues remain in the resolved state. Is
