Can two hosts import the same pool read-only? What happens if one host
imports a pool read-only, then later another imports it read-write?
Don't do that?
Nico
--
___
opensolaris-arc mailing list
opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 12:47:31PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I'm really confused here. Why run in an emulation mode at all? It
seems like we can align and use 4K blocks directly, then we should
*always* do so - at least for those devices which have a 4K physical
block size. The emulated
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 11:02:45AM +0100, John Levon wrote:
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 09:17:00PM -0700, Liane Praza wrote:
To workaround this problem this project will create a new
directory in /etc/logadm.d and an SMF service
svc:/system/logadm-upgrade. A pkg
On Mon, Jul 26, 2010 at 06:20:35PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
I've a prototype start method for a service that essentially generalizes
what this project does. Packages would deliver SVR4-style post* and CAS
scripts into .d-like directories. The start method of this service
scans for new
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:34:44AM -0500, Robert Gordon wrote:
There isn't really any current behavior with respect to sharing in a
zone :)
I understand what you are saying and the zone boot restriction can be
removed, it doesn't effect the proposed new interfaces. My concern is
inadvertent
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 09:57:22AM -0700, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 22/07/2010 17:52, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 11:34:44AM -0500, Robert Gordon wrote:
There isn't really any current behavior with respect to sharing in a
zone :)
I understand what you are saying
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 06:04:31PM +0100, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Robert Gordon wrote:
On Jul 22, 2010, at 10:57 AM, Andrew Gabriel wrote:
Sorry, but why is this restriction necessary?
The team thought that if an administrator created a zone to
partition data with the intent to share data
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 03:47:02PM -0700, Ted H. Kim wrote:
I think this is where things are ending up.
umad to use protection 666 and PRIV_SYS_NET_CONFIG
ucma reserved ports uses PRIV_NET_PRIVADDR
uverbs privileged Q_Keys uses PRIV_NET_PRIVADDR except for
the ones which might be used to
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 05:34:06PM -0700, Ted H. Kim wrote:
Nicolas Williams wrote:
then when the case for userland libraries/commands/utilities
comes along, that case will describe the exec_attr/prof_attr
changes too
Are you adding new profiles or adding to existing profiles? (or both
On Tue, Jun 29, 2010 at 12:14:48PM -0700, Ted H. Kim wrote:
For the umad devices it seems to me that what you want is either to use
one of PRIV_SYS_DL_CONFIG (DL == datalink) or PRIV_SYS_NET_CONFIG (which
aggregates several config privs). Alternatively you could add a new
privilege called,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 06:54:54PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 23/06/2010 17:25, John Fischer wrote:
I understand that this change will break some scripts that admins
or developers have. However, as someone has already pointed out
the decision to move this direction was made in the
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 04:25:09PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
On 6/19/10 6:52 AM, Volker A. Brandt wrote:
3. Obsolete file /etc/nodename. This file will no longer exist in the
system
This will break 1000s of LOC of scripts. I am sure you have
considered the consequences your
On Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 05:12:03PM -0700, Richard Elling wrote:
On Jun 18, 2010, at 2:34 PM, John Fischer wrote:
5. Add the defaultdomain property to the svc:/system/identity:domain SMF
service. The property definition (config/defaultdomain) will be added in
the
SMF manifest.
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 12:37:50PM -0700, John Fischer wrote:
Brian,
Looks good -- +1 .
I did not see the contracts in the sqlite cases.
Are the contracts in process?
SQLite3 is not contracted project private: it's mostly Uncommitted (see
PSARC/2008/120 and subsequent cases). If it were
On Tue, Jun 08, 2010 at 01:15:18PM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
d) every bit costs something. to compile, to link, to deliver. [...]
There's also a run-time cost. Anyone who's browsed for executables to
open media content with from Firefox will have observed that browsing
/bin borders on the
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:41:51AM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Also, your stability levels need to be modernized. We don't use
Evolving and Unstable anymore.. Perhaps you mean Uncommitted and
Volatile?
DTrace sticks to the old taxonomy.
___
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:40:54AM -0700, Darren J Moffat wrote:
/* That's what getpassphrase(3c) supports. */
#define PK11_MAX_TOKEN_PIN_LEN 256
...
int pkcs11_parse_uri(const char *str, pkcs11_uri_t *uri);
Return codes are defined:
...
#define PK11_MUTEX_ERROR6
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:00:50PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
Nicolas Williams wrote:
Hmmm, I think it'd have been better to have the function return an error
when a PIN is need and let the app call it again with the PIN -- let the
app prompt for a PIN.
There's no way to deal
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 10:05:50AM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote:
On 20/05/2010 18:50, Roland Mainz wrote:
IMO this case should either allow the use of multibyte characters or
expcitly refer to bytes/ASCII characters (see below).
Since there is no way of storing encoding information along
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 01:42:30PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Nicolas Williams wrote:
In any case, customers that require strict SysV ABI compliance (e.g.,
customers that have apps that use LOGNAME_MAX and/or L_cuserid and who
cannot or will not re-build those apps) can always stick
On Thu, May 06, 2010 at 04:36:16PM +0800, Kacheong Poon wrote:
On 05/ 6/10 05:27 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Sounds like we might want an equivalent to tcp_max_orphans... Also,
allowing the FIN-WAIT-2 timer to get set to ridiculously large numbers
of seconds strikes me as a bad idea, at least
What happens when a socket in FIN_WAIT2 is close()d, or a process exits
and a socket is closed and ends up in FIN_WAIT2? If the FIN_WAIT2 timer
is set to 2^31, what happens?
Suppose the process is able to exit but the socket lingers. In that
case will the lingering socket defeat resource
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 10:32:27AM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
tcp:::send
TCP transmits a segment.
tcp:::receive
TCP receives a segment.
I don't see probes for sending/receiving ACKs; I assume these two fire
even for packets that have no data.
I also don't see a probe for a
It's probably too late for this case, but if so, then something to keep
in mind for a future case: IPsec latching (see ipsec_latch_t, in
$SRC/uts/common/inet/ip.h). This could either be subsumed into ipinfo_t
or, better, added as one more probe argument, both on receive and on
send probes.
IPsec
On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 07:16:22PM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
On 04/05/2010 18:36, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Sun, May 02, 2010 at 10:32:27AM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
tcp:::send
TCP transmits a segment.
tcp:::receive
TCP receives a segment.
I don't see probes for sending
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:12:03AM -0700, John Fischer wrote:
2.Technical Issues
2.1.Availability through OpenSolaris /contrib repository
The OpenSolaris /contrib repository [1] is a more appropriate
mechanism for delivering Conflict to interested consumers.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:08:28PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
On 04/16/10 11:35, sowmini.varad...@oracle.com wrote:
should deal with forwarded packets. Since the hostmodel feature (and
esp the strong version and its variants) by its very name is not
intended for use for routing/forwarding,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 03:46:14PM -0700, Bart Smaalders wrote:
Personally, I'm of the opinion that / should be a single dataset.
I'd be happier with that as the rule than no rule at all. But I'd like
to be able to set noatime for all static content, but not necessarily
other content.
On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 11:53:33AM +0100, Alan Maguire wrote:
[...]. I think adding the following
set of probes to the original proposal should hopefully
address shortcomings in this area in a manner
consistent with the connect-* and accept-* probes:
tcp:::close-request
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 12:42:00PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote:
On 03/30/10 12:29 PM, Dan Price wrote:
The example was slightly messed up, sorry; that caused misunderstanding.
I'm worried about this situation:
snaps...@1
mv /myfiles/name1 /myfiles/name2
mkdir
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 02:04:39PM -0600, Tim Haley wrote:
It would be easy enough for me to print a 'time' column as the first
column, and the output could then be sent to 'sort -n'. I'm not sure
how people feel about that. Is that cheating? :-) The alternative
is to AVL sort by that
31 matches
Mail list logo
