On 11/1/2005 at 6:24PM, Alex Ross wrote:
Contact
=
If interested, please send e-mail to support at nexenta.com, and tell
us a few words about yourself. We'll respond with a user/password.
Guys, just send e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], tell us a few words about
yourself, that's all. There
On Wednesday 02 November 2005 11:50 pm, Joerg Schilling wrote:
James Lick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what most people are frustrated with is that there is a
disconnect between announcing the project far and wide, but then saying
the site needs to be locked down because it's not quite
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Adam Leventhal wrote:
There seems to be at least a loose concensus that this would be a useful
community. Any +1 votes from the CAB?
+1
Great initiative Adam!
Adam
On Thu, Oct 27, 2005 at 10:16:01AM -0700, Adam Leventhal wrote:
One barrier when adopting a new
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Adam Leventhal wrote:
There seems to be at least a loose concensus that this would be a useful
community. Any +1 votes from the CAB?
+1
+1 Absolutely agree.
I think we should also be open for those in exile such as South
Koreans who may seen be exiled from Windows :-)
Hints as to what the best equivalent to BLKGETSIZE might be would definitely
be appreciated.
The return value from lseek(fd, 0, SEEK_END) should work. But it does not
work with character disk devices on old Solaris (10) releases.
% cat devsz.c
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-03 08:46]:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Adam Leventhal wrote:
There seems to be at least a loose concensus that this would be a useful
community. Any +1 votes from the CAB?
+1
+1 Absolutely agree.
I think we should also be open for those in
In my opinion, a big part of the value of this community will be that it
helps to explain the relevance of OpenSolaris to the wider Linux
community. Extending the scope beyond Linux immigrants could threaten
that.
Patrick
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:06:34AM -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-03 08:46]:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Adam Leventhal wrote:
There seems to be at least a loose concensus that this would be a useful
community. Any +1 votes from the CAB?
+1
In my opinion, a big part of the value of this community will be that it
helps to explain the relevance of OpenSolaris to the wider Linux
community. Extending the scope beyond Linux immigrants could threaten
that.
wider Linux comminity? I think the value of OpenSolaris does not
derive from
Just to clarify: I'm don't mean the value of OpenSolaris as a whole (!),
but the value of a specific discussion group within OpenSolaris.org.
When I talk about a wider audience, I mean that there are a lot of
people who have little or no consciousness of OpenSolaris or any of its
* Adam Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-03 09:36]:
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 09:06:34AM -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-11-03 08:46]:
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Adam Leventhal wrote:
There seems to be at least a loose concensus that this would be
My fear in tragetting Linux explicitly for migration like this is the
name is an enduring hostile act just towards Linux. I prefer
immigrants - nothing to stop it focussing just on the Penguinistas
under that banner for now.
S.
On Nov 3, 2005, at 09:28, Patrick Finch wrote:
In my
12 matches
Mail list logo
