From: nice [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In kernel modules, how to do read/write files ?
VOP_READ()/VOP_WRITE().
For examples, see the e.g. NFS server sourcecode:
http://cvs.opensolaris.org/source/xref/on/usr/src/uts/common/fs/nfs/nfs3_srv.c#r
fs3_write
Do you want to write a layered filesystem ?
Hi,
Finally firefox 1.5 released.
Firefox 1.5 for solaris available on mozilla.org.
You can get them here.
ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/1.5/contrib/
Please read the readme file before you use it.
Regards,
Leon Sha
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 21:47, Albertson, Brett wrote:
nl,
Those updates are for Solaris, not OpenSolaris. Since OpenSolaris source
code is free, updates could be obtained and compiled any time you wanted
them. There will be multiple distributions based on OpenSolaris (Solaris,
SchilliX,
[I've redirected replies to this to [EMAIL PROTECTED] since all
of this is about ZFS, please respect the Reply-To header].
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 15:37, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The simplicity of administration has it's drawbacks at the points where
ZFS in incompatible with the UNIX philosohy
REMINDER REMINDER REMINDER
1st IOSUG meeting
When: Dec 1, 2005 at 17:00
Where: Sun Microsystems office in Herzeliya, HaManofim st, 9
(Accerstein Towers, Tower A, 8th floor)
There is an underground parking lot right beneath the building.
Agenda:
1. OpenSolaris overview
2. Demos
3. Group
Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My reason for preferring /usr/bin unless there's a name conflict is
simply this : if users cannot readily find a command, they implicitly
assume it isn't available. There is basically no benefit obtained from
hiding commands in strange places around
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 13:41, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Bart Smaalders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My reason for preferring /usr/bin unless there's a name conflict is
simply this : if users cannot readily find a command, they implicitly
assume it isn't available. There is basically no benefit
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 02:08, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Bryan Cantrill wrote:
Suffice it to say that we have learned the hard way: put it in /usr/bin
unless there's a conflict that prevents it.
Though I still get complaints about GNOME being in /usr/bin, since it makes
it harder to
I don't believe this book should be password protected. I am checking and will
get it changed if possible.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have a Nexenta elatte gnusolaris partition alongside my NV_27a with
a GNOME 2.12 JDS build. Nexenta is based on the same kernel code and
also contains a GNOME 2.12 desktop. Unfortunately the binaries for the
gnusolaris versions of these applications aren't easily interchangable
with the
http://www.opensuse.org/Making_a_DVD_from_CDs
^ this url was posted in another topic here on this forum..give it a try and
with luck we'll both be elated when it works ( im getting ready to try it
myself)
cheers
neighborlee
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Brian Nitz wrote:
...
Wouldn't it make sense to strive for binary compatibility and between
desktop components of various Sun's Solaris distribution and other
opensolaris distributions or should we assume that ISVs will have to
either write everything to a stable ABI (Java?) or rebuild on
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 10:11:15AM -0800, Sh wrote:
After Solaris installation my Windows doesn't load. Label for booting
windows was created automatically by grub , but it doesn't work.This is
output from format:
Part TagFlag Cylinders SizeBlocks
0
On Wednesday 30 November 2005 05:41 am, Joerg Schilling wrote:
The reason why I still have objections against this idea is that
you may like to create a PATH that includes less binaries and thus seems to
me less dabgerous for administrators.
This type of situation is an exception, for
Brian Nitz wrote:
[ ...]
It think we could get the most efficient sharing of opensource effort if
we worked with the other distributions to make a community architecture
review or at the very least an equivalent to the LSB standard to work
towards. Cross platform and cross release
Brian Nitz wrote:
I have a Nexenta elatte gnusolaris partition alongside my NV_27a with
a GNOME 2.12 JDS build. Nexenta is based on the same kernel code and
also contains a GNOME 2.12 desktop. Unfortunately the binaries for the
gnusolaris versions of these applications aren't easily
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 15:24 -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Brian Nitz wrote:
I have a Nexenta elatte gnusolaris partition alongside my NV_27a with
a GNOME 2.12 JDS build. Nexenta is based on the same kernel code and
also contains a GNOME 2.12 desktop. Unfortunately the binaries for the
I make a kernel module. In the module, I redirect write system call. Before the
data write to the file, I need to handle the data.
In my write system call's function, what I do like this:
1. allocate the memory
2. copy the data from userspace
3. handle the data
4. call the original write system
nawir wrote:
Dear expert,
Just want to know some zfs features after trying with express b27.
1. seems the root disk still , so still have to use svm for mirroring root disk
correct, ZFS isn't bootable yet.
4. whether zfs created in sparc can be imported in sol10 x86
zfs created in sparc
On Wed, Nov 30, 2005 at 05:57:53PM -0800, nice wrote:
I make a kernel module. In the module, I redirect write system call. Before
the data write to the file, I need to handle the data.
In my write system call's function, what I do like this:
1. allocate the memory
2. copy the data from
20 matches
Mail list logo
