On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 01:56, Gary Gendel wrote:
I just installed snv_28 Sparc and am now seeing these strange errors in my
log:
[ID 336459 user.info] libpkcs11: /usr/lib/security/pkcs11_softtoken.so
CRYPTOKI minor version, 20, may not be compatible with minor version 11.
Things seem to
On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 01:56, Gary Gendel wrote:
I just installed snv_28 Sparc and am now seeing these strange errors in my
log:
[ID 336459 user.info] libpkcs11: /usr/lib/security/pkcs11_softtoken.so
CRYPTOKI minor version, 2
0, may not be compatible with minor version 11.
Things seem
On Fri, 2005-12-23 at 20:22, Mike Bo wrote:
First, Sun support is great. However, there are frequent revisions to
OpenSSH. When time is of the essence, like immediately following the
discovery of a weakness, OpenSSH is going to be patched almost immediately.
With all due respect to Sun, I
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 10:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm still seeing it. (Build 30 + build 30 crypto packages)
On my system it's logged to /var/log/authlog (log level auth.info).
Which bug number did you log for this because I can't find it.
--
Darren J Moffat
Darren,
I installed snv_28 over snv_18 which was originally installed over
Solaris 10, all from CDs. Even though it works fine, These messages are
filling up my logs, one in [user.info] and two in [sshd.info] for every
connection.
I hope this helps.
Regards,
Gary
Darren J Moffat wrote:
On
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 12:48, Gary Gendel wrote:
Darren,
I installed snv_28 over snv_18 which was originally installed over
Solaris 10, all from CDs. Even though it works fine, These messages are
filling up my logs, one in [user.info] and two in [sshd.info] for every
connection.
I've
As always, a big thanks for everyone's help.
Gary
Darren J Moffat wrote:
On Tue, 2006-01-03 at 12:48, Gary Gendel wrote:
Darren,
I installed snv_28 over snv_18 which was originally installed over
Solaris 10, all from CDs. Even though it works fine, These messages are
filling up my logs,
Bob Palowoda wrote:
I'm curious as to how slow Sun's homepage is? I have
the same problem it can take from 2 to 10 min to get
the homepage displayed and I don't have a slow
Bob, I was refering to the problem described in perf-discuss mailing
list titled Poor performance of X (or
I would be very careful using any optimization that sets the -fns on
Sun Studio, as I've seen significant differences in results when
enabling this. For that matter, -ffast-math has a similar effect with
gcc.
No such optimization is involved, because no such flags are passed.
This is pure
I know the key combination in a linux distro is C-A-Backspace, but I cannot
locate the combination for OpenSolaris or Solaris 10. I need to be able to
stop the desktop login from ever loading and just work with the console. (This
is because I have a monitor that won't work with the current X
Michael T Kotlarski wrote:
I know the key combination in a linux distro is C-A-Backspace, but I cannot
locate the combination for OpenSolaris or Solaris 10. I need to be able to
stop the desktop login
from ever loading and just work with the console. (This is because I have a
monitor that
Hi Andrew -
Andrew wrote On 12/21/05 06:25,:
I'm considering contributing code to opensolaris, but I have some questions
about the SCA.
1. sun_contributor_agreement.pdf contains the following seven fields for
contact information:
Full Name
E-mail
Username(s)
Mailing Address
Country
There was a problem with the survey tool of all things. Anyhoo, it's back up
and running now. Sorry for the inconvenience. Let us know if there are any
other problems..
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
b Do i NOT /i Reply to my email address - it will bounce. I read this
mailing list. Thank you. /b
br
For something like KDE I would imagine that the
memory footprint would
be more important than anything else when it comes to
performance.
br
On X86-32/64 - yes you are right. If Sun Studio
On 1/3/06, David Schanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would imagine that Sun Studio may generate better code for some
intense computational tasks, and I never claimed it doesn't. I would
also imagine that KDE's components do not do any computationally
intensive tasks.
i imagine, i would
On 1/3/06, Stefan Teleman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 1/3/06, David Schanen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would imagine that Sun Studio may generate better code for some
intense computational tasks, and I never claimed it doesn't. I would
also imagine that KDE's components do not do any
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 04:27 pm, Stefan Teleman wrote:
insofar as i am concerned, KDE Solaris with GCC is not going to
happen. every Tom, Dick and Harry can type './configure' followed by
'gmake' and build KDE on their own. my participation in this
collective exercise is neither required,
The course emphasized extensively on the placement of
each logical
volume's PP i.e. the above physical partitioning
(1016) layout...either
on the outer edge, middle or inner edge of the
cylinderical disk.
They allow you to specify where to place the PP, this is because accessing to
18 matches
Mail list logo
