* Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060104 14:38]:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the
usability.
Which are ?
Support for gziped or bzip2ed packages!
It can already download packages over http or
Great idea !
I personally would appreciate such an area, since I support, deploy, architect
and administer most of the time. There must be plenty of people out there that
work with Solaris/Sparc/X86 everyday in almost all sectors of IT, except for
coding. It's very difficult (my opinion) to
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 10:17, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] [060104 14:38]:
On Wed, 2006-01-04 at 13:34, Joerg Schilling wrote:
We would need a few simple extensions to pkgadd to increase the
usability.
Which are ?
Support for gziped or bzip2ed
Could be interesting to see a compiler shootout between:
SUN Studio 11, gcc3.4, gcc4.02 [amd64 + sparc]
+ Intel C Compiler, Pathscale [amd64]
I expect Sun's compiler to be the clear winner on sparc against gcc.
But about amd64 ... this might be interesting, especially against Pathscale.
Programs
Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was suggesting that putting names into the source code was occasional
rather than be the norm [for example, when you create a new file],
When you like to add names into the source, you would need to do this for
External people and for Sun people in the
I think this is an excellent idea. SA's are a crucial community for
OpenSolaris/Solaris, and the more information we have about what works and what
doesn't work, the better we can make the system!
+1
Bev.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Ché Kristo wrote:
Look at what happens on java.net, key blogs of note are given prominence on
the front page or what about something like developer spotlight like they are
using on jxta.org?
That is an artificial way of doing things though, wouldn't you say that
community recognition
I'll fourth that sentiment.
Part of my problem has been that I want to be involved, but I'm not a
programmer. So, this begs the question of exactly where I should start. That
is, there are a number of aspects of Solaris 10/OpenSolaris that I'm really
interested in, but that means having to
Take a look at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/governance_proposal/#Communities -
basically, if there's enough interest, the CAB pays attention and blesses us :-)
Bev.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
I run into this same issue, our specialties don't always map to the same
categories selected when the forums were created, it has to be an even
bigger problem outside sun where sysadmins of small organizations are
forced to be a Jack of all trades.
Does anyone know of any forum engine which
Thanks Bev,
Looks like we have to define the following and create enough interest:
New communities are created by sending a proposal describing the
scope, goals, and initial core developers to the opensolaris-discuss
mailing list.
So lets start brain storming on what the scope and goals should
Well I'd like to see this move forward. I don't know
what the process
is exactly, but I'll volunteer for heading the
community. Anyone know
what the steps are for getting this going?
Octave
We have a somewhat informal system set up pending the finalization of the
governance. So, a
I'm a doc manager who would be thrilled to participate in this community and
learn about ways we can create new information that would meet the needs of
this very important community. Count me in as a positive vote!
Diane
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Thanks Diane!
--- Diane Plampin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm a doc manager who would be thrilled to participate in this
community and learn about ways we can create new information that
would meet the needs of this very important community. Count me in as
a positive vote!
Diane
This
Diane, Octave, et al--
There should be lots of opportunity for collaboration between the doc community
and
a new sys admin community. I look forward to opening up discussions on
potential overlaps and collaboration opportunities once this community gets off
the ground, which I assume it will!
Take a look at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/governance_proposal/#Communities -
basi
cally, if there's enough interest, the CAB pays attention and blesses us :-)
I'll happily +1 a Sysadmin Community.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss
I blame ZFS for this one, but it was inevitable anyway. I love my Sun Cobalt
Qube 3 to bits, but it is getting rather long in the tooth. A while back I
migrated most of my home network services to Solaris 10 on my son's old Athlon
PC. It now has four large IDE drives serving our house with over
Glynn Foster wrote:
So, from a development point of view, I was somewhat surprised, having
never really looked at the ON code before, that there's no recognition
of people who wrote the code in the source files.
Are we unusual in this respect? How do other open source communities do
it?
For discussions that might interest multiple communities, we've been
encouraging the original poster to pick a single discussion list to hold
the conversation in, and do one-time postings to the other lists that
point to the main posting. Something like hey, we're talking about
topic over here on
Frank Hofmann wrote:
The Solaris sourcecode is the product of the
hard work done by so many people that putting their names into the
sourcefiles directly, or even keeping a central repository credits.txt
(whatever) is only going to clutter things.
This is already being done; see Sponsor
Thanks Casper! Your opinions and support are highly valued by
sysadmins!
Octave
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take a look at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/cab/governance_proposal/#Communities
- basi
cally, if there's enough interest, the CAB pays attention and blesses
us :-)
Hi Mike,
I think this will probably be the best mechanism until something else
can be invented:) Perhaps as time goes by certain individuals will be
responsible for coordinating communications with other communities to
keep things moving.
Octave
--- Mike Kupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For
Octave Orgeron wrote:
***
* Octave J. Orgeron *
* Solaris Infrastructure Architect*
* http://unixconsole.blogspot.com *
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] *
***
Hey, Octave ... if you are interested I can
Thank you Jim. I would be honored to have my blog on the main list.
Thanks!
-Octave
--- Jim Grisanzio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Octave Orgeron wrote:
***
* Octave J. Orgeron *
* Solaris Infrastructure Architect*
*
Octave Orgeron wrote:
Thank you Jim. I would be honored to have my blog on the main list.
Thanks!
Ok, cool. I just did it. Should update when you blog next. If anyone
else is blogging about OpenSolaris or Solaris, let me know.
Jim
--
Jim Grisanzio, Community Manager, OpenSolaris
Hey,
On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:34 -0500, James Carlson wrote:
I still think it looks rather cheesy. First of all, there's the plain
old clutter problem. I wasn't thrilled with the excess of the CDDL
language (the original two-line copyright notice, though slightly
annoying, was comparatively
26 matches
Mail list logo
