** SPECIAL ADDED ATTRACTION *
Folks, I'm glad to announce that we have a special added attraction. Recently,
Jim Mauro and Richard McDougall updated and came out with a new edition of
their Solaris Internals book. Both of these dynamic duo will be giving a
short
as already stated last year
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=787tstart=15 the public
view on the bug database could be improved.
Any progress on this to report?
bbr
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
+1.
A small question, why not ON11? Does it has anything different? Just
curious. :-)
Same reason it's not ON-NV; life goes on after Solaris Nevada.
I suggest the community be named OS-NET; ONNV has the NV disambiguator
which ON lacks.
Casper
___
Eric Lowe writes:
And while you're at it, would you create a Nevada project which is
sponsored by the ON community? Or is everyone content with the current
structure as-is?
I have at least one point of confusion about this plan. I suspect
it's probably something that someone has discussed
Alan,
May I be so bold as to inquire as to which model and any caveats
that you may have encountered? Thank you in advance.
-- Darren
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan
DuBoff
Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:17 PM
To: Everett F
Steve == Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve The initial leaders will be:
Steve mjnelson (Mark J. Nelson)
Steve dduvall (Danek Duvall)
Steve dm120769 (Dave Marker)
Steve petede (Pete Dennis)
Steve stevel (Stephen Lau)
Steve garypen (Gary Pennington)
Let me ask a process question
Dave Marquardt writes:
Let me ask a process question here. This is the second proposed
project I've seen in a week that has had more than 1 or 2 leaders.
What is it about the way we set up projects in OpenSolaris that causes
us to want more than 1 or 2 leaders? Is it something structural?
Dave Marquardt wrote:
Let me ask a process question here. This is the second proposed
project I've seen in a week that has had more than 1 or 2 leaders.
What is it about the way we set up projects in OpenSolaris that causes
us to want more than 1 or 2 leaders? Is it something structural?
In
Joey Guo wrote:
A small question, why not ON11? Does it has anything different? Just
curious. :-)
Because when we were wrapping up Solaris 10, and needed to start working
on the next version, management marketing hadn't decided yet what that
would be, so the name Nevada was chosen to represent
* James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-07-25 07:30]:
Dave Marquardt writes:
Let me ask a process question here. This is the second proposed
project I've seen in a week that has had more than 1 or 2 leaders.
What is it about the way we set up projects in OpenSolaris that causes
us to
Dave Marquardt wrote:
Steve == Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve The initial leaders will be:
Steve mjnelson (Mark J. Nelson)
Steve dduvall (Danek Duvall)
Steve dm120769 (Dave Marker)
Steve petede (Pete Dennis)
Steve stevel (Stephen Lau)
Steve
Hey,
LIVE from the O'Reilly Conference in Portland, Oregon I bring you the
latest news from OpenSolaris - it's been a busy week, and a bloody
miracle I've managed to get it out :)
Glynn
==
John Levon announced [1] that a new Xen release was now available, for both
binaries
and source
On Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Dave Marquardt wrote:
Let me ask a process question here. This is the second proposed
project I've seen in a week that has had more than 1 or 2 leaders.
What is it about the way we set up projects in OpenSolaris that causes
us to want more
On Tuesday 25 July 2006 06:39 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alan,
May I be so bold as to inquire as to which model and any caveats
that you may have encountered? Thank you in advance.
-- Darren
Sure, I'm running it on a MacBook Pro 15, but I think it will work on any of
the new
Michael,
Rainer Orth wrote:
I think here's an important misunderstanding: this is not how free software
works. If Sun as a vendor or the OpenSolaris community as a whole rely on
GCC in some way (as Sun has done for the initial amd64 port), it is their
responsibility to test GCC on
All,
We are making changes to our machine configurations tomorrow so we will
be taking down the site for approximately 1 hour. We will the provide
specific outage times tomorrow at 10:30 AM PDT. Mail lists should
function properly during this time.
Please refer any questions or comments to
so the name Nevada was chosen to represent the next version. [...] A
neutral
name like Nevada avoids betting marketing won't change their mind before
release.
If the community is going to be ON (which I'm not thrilled with; I'd rather see
it called something a little less esoteric), then
17 matches
Mail list logo
