TECHNOLOGY ALERT
from The Wall Street Journal.
Sunday, Jan. 21, 2007
Sun and Intel have been negotiating an agreement
under which Sun would buy
Intel chips for use in server systems. Such a deal
would be a blow to AMD,
currently Sun's exclusive supplier for chips based on
the popular
Intel also agrees to endorse Solaris. Intel has a sizable contingent
working on Linux compatibili ty. It should be expected that some of
them will be switched to Solaris (in comparison, we still y et to hear
ANYTHING about any work, or any promise therefor, on porting the
proprietary ATI
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sun (not SUN) did not refuse to port Solaris to Itanium; Sun *did*
port Solaris to Itanium (I have a poloshirt commemorating the bringup
of Solaris on Itanium, it says Sunrise on Merced). The falling out
had other reasons, but that's all water under the bridge...
It
Sun (not SUN) did not refuse to port Solaris to Itanium; Sun *did*
port Solaris to Itanium (I have a poloshirt commemorating the bringup
of Solaris on Itanium, it says Sunrise on Merced). The falling out
had other reasons, but that's all water under the bridge...
It would be interesting to
Vincenzo Sciarra wrote:
I have just published a pre-alfa of a patch that has the goal to make OpenSSH
aware with PMI.
Reference site : http://nutmay.sourceforge.net
What is PIM and how is this interesting to OpenSolaris ?
I couldn't find anything actually saying what this was on the
Thanks Spenser, I looked at usr/src/head/rpcsvc/mount.x, I couldn't find an
explicit definition of xdr_mountres3() in that file, maybe thre is a bit of
magic in how rpcgen generates common/mount_xdr.c that will then eventually
have that definition. Thanks for the pointers.
Ashok
This
Thanks Spenser, I looked at usr/src/head/rpcsvc/mount.x, I couldn't
find an explicit definition of xdr_mountres3() in that file, maybe
thre is a bit of magic in how rpcgen generates common/mount_x dr.c
that will then eventually have that definition. Thanks for the
pointers.
Of course there
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure what rumours you've heard about the Solaris/Itanium
cancellation, but I've never heard 32 bit compatibility figuring in them.
I heard that Intel did not ship real HW to Sun although Solaris was the first
port because Sun did not plan to add 32 bit
Yes,It's probably true,LGPL is a less problem than GPL.In my perfect world
every *GPL should be banned to the normal use.In a world where everything
change in a day,we should speak about opportunities.In my opinion,an official
project for KDE (I prefer to consider kde4) on OpenSolaris (that I
Hi all,
Is there any update on suspend-to-ram/suspend-to-disk support on x86 platform?
It has been a while since last time I heard about that.
Thanks a lot!
Ivan.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
John Sonnenschein writes:
On 21-Jan-07, at 6:18 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
Let's not forget its GPL license either which means that I can't
write CDDL software (logical since this is *OpenSolaris*) that uses
it (unless I dual license which I refuse to do). Gtk's LGPL license
is
Yes,I'm reading,thank you.At the moment it seems a good accord for Sun and our
community.I'm thinking about the mobile market.Tomorrow should be more simple
take a full compatible notebook.Great Sun, +1 ! :-)
Giacomo
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Yu-Hui Liu wrote:
Problem
- After all the configuration, went into “The system is being
initialized, please wait…” and hung there.
I have the same problem but on my physical machine with the 55b of SXCR.
It locks up hard where the mouse won't even move anymore. I have
another
And what do you know, the live webcast even works with Solaris/x86
(Solaris Nevada, b56, Fujitsu S2110; Turion :-)
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
This is an important issue for this project.I think,it should be cleared
(eventually with trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And what do you know, the live webcast even works with Solaris/x86
(Solaris Nevada, b56, Fujitsu S2110; Turion :-)
Solaris Nevada, b54, Ultra 20, Opteron 152. :-)
--
Rich Teer, SCSA, SCNA, SCSECA, OpenSolaris CAB member
President,
Rite Online
Hi,
Looking for the device driver and application source code to be made available,
to enable porting to x86, PPC, etc.
This would allow greater market place for these cards and increase useful life
span!
Thanks
This message posted from opensolaris.org
This is an important issue for this project.I
think,it should be cleared (eventually with
trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
That helps. The last I checked, they had not made it
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
This is an important issue for this project.I think,it should be cleared
(eventually with trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
Are You Ready?
The Inaugural meeting of the NEOSUG (New England Opensolaris User Group)
will be held on January 31, 2007 from 5:30-8:00 pm at the Sun
Microsystems campus in Burlington MA. (Map courtesy of Google Maps)
Are You Ready?
The Inaugural meeting of the NEOSUG (New England Opensolaris User Group)
will be held on January 31, 2007 from 5:30-8:00 pm at the Sun
Microsystems campus in Burlington MA. (Map courtesy of Google Maps)
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
This is an important issue for this project.I
think,it should be cleared (eventually with
trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
This is an important issue for this project.I
think,it should be cleared (eventually with
trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
Dear (qemu@)opensolaris community,
I played a bit with porting virtualbox.de to Nevada_x86.
But I'm losing ways too much time there and will stop now.
The ROI doesn't justify the effort required (at least not, if one has
more urgent things to get finished, as most of us do).
It can't be done in a
Bob Palowoda wrote:
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
This is an important issue for this project.I
think,it should be cleared (eventually with
trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
Hi -
I am trying to build a static version of the C library by following the
directions in README.makefile found in /lib directory. That is I am defining
LIBS = $(LIBRARY). I know that some of you would say that it is not recommended
to build static versions of libraries, but the reason I want
I am trying to build a static version of the C library by following the
directions in README.makefile found in /lib directory.
There are many things in libc which require it to be a dynamic library.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On a side-note: Precompiled vbox linux binaries might potentially work
under LXrun or inside a linux zone (at least qemu does).
However, since LKMs are not supported by those environments, you could
never benefit from vbox's better performance (over qemu), as the speed
can only be achieved by the
Are You Ready?
The Inaugral meeting of the NEOSUG (New England Opensolaris User Group)
will be held on January 31, 2007 from 5:30-8:00 pm at the Sun
Microsystems campus in Burlington MA.
The agenda for the evening will include an introduction to the
OpenSolaris project, and a technical
Haris wrote:
Hi -
Please try not to post the same question to several lists, you end up
getting fragmented or duplicated replies, which is a waste of people's time.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I'm happy to anounce that Ben Rockwood, Director of Systems, Joyent Inc., and
long time Solaris/OpenSolaris supporter and advocate of OpenSolaris in our
community, will tell exactly why Joyent doesn't fsck. In fact, Joyent uses
OpenSolaris so they don't fsck! This will be the first time we hear
Bob Palowoda wrote:
De Togni Giacomo wrote:
This is an important issue for this project.I
think,it should be cleared (eventually with
trolltech) before start the project.
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/knowledgebase/192/
http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/Licensing
Graeme Houston wrote:
Hi,
Looking for the device driver and application source code to be made
available, to enable porting to x86, PPC, etc.
This would allow greater market place for these cards and increase useful life
span!
Thanks
+1
That would be nice.
--Martin
Bob Palowoda wrote:
Mixing different licenses in Solaris and OpenSolaris. Who would have
thought that would ever happen.
---Bob
Go back and close everything again (as much as still possible).
A single license then.
Will that help?
Mhh, no.
One has to be flexible nowadays, with that
I am trying to build a static version of the C
library by following the
directions in README.makefile found in /lib
directory.
There are many things in libc which require it to be
a dynamic library.
So, you say that is not possible to create a static version of libc or that
source
On 1/22/07, Haris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am trying to build a static version of the C
library by following the
directions in README.makefile found in /lib
directory.
There are many things in libc which require it to be
a dynamic library.
So, you say that is not possible to create
OpenSolaris is community code. We're not going to do any major changes without
talking first with the community. (That's you. :-))
- Stephen Harpster, replying to rumours that OpenSolaris
would be dual licensed under GPLv3
==
Alan
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, Al Hopper wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007, W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
According to the rumor mill:
http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=37089
(Major Intel, Sun deal to be announced Monday)
Confirmed - but you need a subscription to read the WSJ URL below:
TECHNOLOGY
The proposal is to move the sharetab info out of /etc/dfs/sharetab
and into memory. Users can still get
to the data via a filesystem interface - think of the mnttab.
Problem Statement
The /etc/dfs/sharetab file is used to store the currently
shared exports. It contains all of the security
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/01/22/opensolaris_sun/
Please comment (and correct the bottom-most comment by Hetz Ben Hamo,
which is FUD).
--
Best regards,
Martin Bochnig
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I would post to the article itself but I don't want to register an
account for one post...
On 1/22/07, Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2007/01/22/opensolaris_sun/
Please comment (and correct the bottom-most comment by Hetz Ben Hamo,
which is FUD).
Hmm.
Hi!
Does anyone know when the B56 sources will be released ? Seems that this
may be the version we'll pick for final code review of the
ksh93-integration tree...
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, CJAVASunUnix programmer
/O
42 matches
Mail list logo
