Re: [osol-discuss] good intentions, wrong approach

Martin Bochnig wrote: if you do see a difference {community <--versus--> project}, then okay. i would appreciate it, if someone could and actually would explain it to me. I believe that there are several different/conflicting definitions in play: Scenario #1: The proposed constitution ARTI

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Last Day for Nominations

Martin Bochnig wrote: Situation BEFORE I released my binaries: http://blogs.sun.com/alanc/entry/xorg_for_solaris_sparc Situation AFTER my various postings to http://opensolaris.org/os/community/x_win/discussions/ : You released Xorg for SPARC by yourself (limited to the wsfb driver) : http://o

Re: [osol-discuss] good intentions, wrong approach

Martin Bochnig wrote: forget my recent suggestions (cab/ogb etc.) if you do see a difference {community <--versus--> project}, then okay. i would appreciate it, if someone could and actually would explain it to me. The difference is defined in the constitution, though as several of us have sa

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] SXCE Build 59 available

Ian Collins wrote: Alan Coopersmith wrote: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=24027&tstart=0 Any idea when the 64 bit nVidia driver will ship? We're gonna try to get it into nv_60 or nv_61 if possible. -- -Alan Coopersmith- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Microsys

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] SXCE Build 59 available

Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Derek Cicero wrote: > >> Please find the links to SXCE Build 59 at >> . > > > If you're planning to use this on x86/x64 as a desktop, please > note the known issues in the Xorg 7.2 heads up thread (both > the original message a

Re: [osol-discuss] Why libc.so.1 mounted?

On 07/03/07, Raju Alluri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi, I installed nv_58 (and nv_41 in the past) and I see that /lib/libc.so.1 is a mount. Why is it so? Is there a reason to do so specifically for this file? Please see this blog post for an explanation: http://blogs.sun.com/darren/date/200411

[osol-discuss] Why libc.so.1 mounted?

Hi, I installed nv_58 (and nv_41 in the past) and I see that /lib/libc.so.1 is a mount. Why is it so? Is there a reason to do so specifically for this file? See the df command output below. TIA. Regards, - Raju bash-3.00$ df -k Filesystemkbytesused avail capacity Mounted on

[osol-discuss] Re: Last Day for Nominations

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:42:41PM -0800, Roy T. Fielding wrote: > Keith, you have made that comment before and I still can't find any > basis for it in reality. The OGB has almost no powers. It has no > money. > It cannot hire or fire. It has no property. It cannot even make > copyright lic

[osol-discuss] What is OpenSolaris success?

If I can steal the spotlight for a second, I'd like to point people at a blog entry I've put up that discusses my take on "what is success in terms of OpenSolaris", complete with some suggestions for the future and what I think it will take for it to really succeed - mostly time. http://blogs.s

[osol-discuss] Links to rollup reports

Here are links to the latest batch of overview reports (rollups). You can also receive them by subscribing to the RSS feed: http://del.icio.us/rss/bootblog/oss:rollups or bookmarking the URL: http://del.icio.us/bootblog/oss:rollups cab-discuss 02/16 - 02/28 http://mail.opensol

[osol-discuss] Overview (rollup) of recent activity on opensolaris-discuss

For background on what this is, see: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=24416#24416 http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=25200#25200 = opensolaris-discuss 02/16 - 02/28 = Size of all threads du

[osol-discuss] Re: Last Day for Nominations

On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Roy T. Fielding wrote: ... ... This election is the initial bootstrap process. The new OGB will be responsible for reorganizing the communities into groups that can govern themselves with somewhat less anarchic tendencies than the current situation of having informal proposal

[osol-discuss] Re: Last Day for Nominations

On Mar 5, 2007, at 2:00 PM, Keith M Wesolowski wrote: On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:55:37AM +1300, Glynn Foster wrote: But there's absolutely no consistency with that. There's no guidelines or best practices of how to apply the membership. If one community's interpretation of the process is easier

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Last Day for Nominations

On Mar 5, 2007, at 10:30 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: I also think this is a good sign that the relationship between Communities and Projects is not well understood by all participants. There are times it hasn't been at all clear to me, at least. Perhaps getting an endorsing community needs to be

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 Update testing

On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Girts Zeltins wrote: Hello, Why I write this, because there is need to discuss about Solaris 10 Update public beta testing. The Solaris 10 Update releases must be opened for beta testing for all. Now there is only public Nevada. Solaris 10 is not Open Solaris. It does

[osol-discuss] Re: [osol-announce] SXCE Build 59 available

Derek Cicero wrote: Please find the links to SXCE Build 59 at . If you're planning to use this on x86/x64 as a desktop, please note the known issues in the Xorg 7.2 heads up thread (both the original message and the later followup with additional bug

[osol-discuss] SXCE Build 59 available

Please find the links to SXCE Build 59 at . - Derek -- Derek Cicero Program Manager Solaris Kernel Group, Software Division ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Three screencasts of OpenSolaris Technologies

Cool, I'll keep tabs on these via that solaris.xml feed. Thank again. Eric On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Christine Sterner wrote: We would have to post an email to opensolaris-announce. Solaris Developer Center doesn't announce by email, though if you subscribe

[osol-discuss] Re: Three screencasts of OpenSolaris Technologies

We would have to post an email to opensolaris-announce. Solaris Developer Center doesn't announce by email, though if you subscribe to the Solaris Developer newsletter or get the RSS

[osol-discuss] Three screencasts of OpenSolaris Technologies

On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Christine Sterner wrote: The first two were announced and have links on the home page and Community/Webcast page at the Solaris Developer Center. -chris

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [dtrace-discuss] Three screencasts of OpenSolaris Technologies

Sorry, I sent the wrong url for the webcast page. Should have been: http://developers.sun.com/solaris/community/discussions/webvideo_casts.jsp * DTrace for JavaScript Debugging Presented by Brendan Gregg

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Hypervisor for SPARC T1

I'm soo glad that LDom's has finally been released for everyone to test drive. I've been involved in the beta program for a while now and have wanted to talk about it ever since I booted my first guest domain. Keep an eye on my blog for quick how-to's and stuff. Octave --- Bernd Schemmer <[EMAIL

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [dtrace-discuss] Three screencasts of OpenSolaris Technologies

If you can give me a few details, I can post an entry to On The Record site. It is owned by Sun PR and we are constantly publishing information to it and then letting the media know about it. It is a great tool. http://blogs.sun.com/ontherecord/ -terri Christine Sterner wrote: The first tw

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [dtrace-discuss] Three screencasts of OpenSolaris Technologies

The first two were announced and have links on the home page and Community/Webcast page at the Solaris Developer Center. -chris Peter B. Kessler wrote: Eric Boutilier wrot

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Hypervisor for SPARC T1

>>Browse on over to >> >>http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=45b14cf9 >>The download includes the required firmware and the LDoms manager. Thanks for the link! I already have the BluePrint released some days ago for reading. >>Have fun! Will Do regards Bernd This message posted

[osol-discuss] good intentions, wrong approach

forget my recent suggestions (cab/ogb etc.) if you do see a difference {community <--versus--> project}, then okay. i would appreciate it, if someone could and actually would explain it to me. no direct feedback --> no ability (for me) to grow --> no self-improvement. going back to the basement

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Hypervisor for SPARC T1

> Hmm, when will it be publicly released? The LDOM > support in Solaris 10 > U3 is not very useful without the software to create > and configure the > Logical Domains. Browse on over to http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=45b14cf9 The download includes the required firmware and the

[osol-discuss] XP Media Centre

Hi, I am expecing an Acer Aspire 5103 tomorrow from http://www.shopacer.co.uk";>www.shopacer.co.uk The os on the laptop is XP Media Centre, I have only ever used XP Home is media centre going to be completely alien to me This message posted from opensolaris.org __

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 8 VLAN interfaces

daz306td writes: > Unfortunatly we still have some Solaris 8 boxes still active and > there is a requirement to add VLAN interfaces. Solaris 8 isn't based on Open Solaris. You should contact your local Sun support instead. > # ifconfig qfe2003 plumb > ifconfig: SIOCSLIFNAME for ip: qfe2003: no s

[osol-discuss] Solaris 8 VLAN interfaces

Unfortunatly we still have some Solaris 8 boxes still active and there is a requirement to add VLAN interfaces. This I have previoulsy done in solaris 10 simply plumbing the interface "ifconfig qfe2003 plumb" for an example. Going back to Solaris 8. I have installed the vlan packages (SUNW

Re: [cab-discuss] Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Last Day for Nominations

On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 11:38:46PM +, Simon Phipps wrote: > Indeed, I agree totally. And they didn't, it was left to the > Communities. The direct recognition process is an exception-handling > process. Yes; the volume of requests just makes it clear that we need a higher-level exception-

[osol-discuss] Re: [sfwnv-discuss] netsnmp in /usr/sfw (fwd)

> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:29:39AM -0600, Eric > Boutilier wrote: > > > I am not sure which list this questions best > belongs to, so I try here > > first. Has anyone tried to build with library > configuration returned by > > `/usr/sfw/bin/net-snmp-config -libs`? > > No. On Solaris, this is

Re: [osol-discuss] Project proposal: User Mode Driver

Artem Kachitchkine wrote: IMHO, adding new frameworks to the OS in order to work around legal issues is a fundamentally flawed motivation and can lead to duplication, added maintenance burden, confusion among developers and other problems. While there are purely technical advantages of a gene

Re: [osol-discuss] Lost in NV_56-land..... printing? Sendmail trying to contact Yahoo? HELP!

HI Randy, There is a GUI that does all the lpadmin thing, it is /usr/sbin/printmgr. You can use this is to add to add a new print queue, Printer->New Attached Printer ... -select Make -select model etc. The printer ports for your local printer should be /dev/printers/[N] since you are well ver

[osol-discuss] Re: Lost in NV_56-land..... printing? Sendmail trying to contact Yahoo? HEL

> # ls -al /dev/lp1 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Feb 6 21:53 /dev/lp1 -> > ../devices/isa/[EMAIL PROTECTED],378:ecpp0 > > Which is what I would expect to see, except that: > > # cd /devices/isa > # ls > [EMAIL PROTECTED],2f8 [EMAIL PROTECTED],2f8:b,cu [EMAIL > PROTECTED],3

Re: [osol-discuss] Solaris 10 Update testing

On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 01:38:18AM -0800, Girts Zeltins wrote: > Hello, > > Why I write this, because there is need to discuss about Solaris 10 Update > public beta testing. The Solaris 10 Update releases must be opened for beta > testing for all. Now there is only public Nevada. No there isn't

[osol-discuss] Solaris 10 Update testing

Hello, Why I write this, because there is need to discuss about Solaris 10 Update public beta testing. The Solaris 10 Update releases must be opened for beta testing for all. Now there is only public Nevada. Kind Regards, Girts This message posted from opensolaris.org _