DOes it mean not 32bit version or does it meant they
abandon Solaris
x86 altogether?!?!!?!?
There will be a Solaris i86pc version, but only 64-bit.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Hi,
I do not know, if this is the right place but I ask anyway:
Why are there no 16 socket (or more) x64 (Xeon or Opteron) servers on the
market?
1. is there no demand?
2. are there techinchal restrictions?
3. do the major server vendors do not want to compete against there own
Unix-systems
On Jan 28, 2008 11:48 PM, A Hettinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think too many of us are too obsessed with the SXCE
updates. Let's move at least some of our vigors to
Indiana. This is where actions should be in the next
couple of months. :-)
(Is anyone aware that OOo 2.3.1 now
Hi,
On 01/29/08 12:18, Dennis wrote:
Hi,
I do not know, if this is the right place but I ask anyway:
Why are there no 16 socket (or more) x64 (Xeon or Opteron) servers on the
market?
1. is there no demand?
I don't know about this.
2. are there techinchal restrictions?
Yes, for example
Hi,
I do not know, if this is the right place but I ask
anyway:
Why are there no 16 socket (or more) x64 (Xeon or
Opteron) servers on the market?
1. is there no demand?
2. are there techinchal restrictions?
3. do the major server vendors do not want to compete
against there own
After installing build 78 using a GeForce 6200 Video
card in a V40z with the packaged Nvidia driver in b78
all I could get on the screen is the NVIDIA logo,
Never get a login. I uninstalled the Nvidia drivers
native to solaris and downloaded the drivers for x86
solaris from Nvidia web site
Al Hopper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ref: www.genunix.org
We have the latest/greatest SchilliX, along with NexentaCP and the
Nexenta APT package repository (updated every 4 hours) available at
Genunix.org. Let the downloads commence! :)
Thank you for updating genunix.org with a recent
Not everyone agrees with you on this. It is my understanding that SXCE
releases will continue, and until such time as standards compliancy is
actually considered a goal of Indiana, it is of little interest.
Frankly, if forced to discontinue my reliance on SXCE, I will likely go
to ShilliX, as
I think too many of us are too obsessed with the
SXCE
updates. Let's move at least some of our vigors
to
Indiana. This is where actions should be in the
next
couple of months. :-)
(Is anyone aware that OOo 2.3.1 now works in the
update version of India?)
Not everyone
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The ksh93/bash holy war is off-topic for pkg-discuss.
This list is for the discussion of the development of the packaging system.
Indiana-discuss, or perhaps alt.fetish on USENET, would be a better
forum for this thread.
Or just remind people (either via email
At the present time, since so many key components/features are missing, it is
very difficult for us to take Indiana seriously. (If I begin to list the
missing key features, I will be instantly labeled a troll.)
Most of us are keenly aware the significance of the Indiana project. Once it
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
At the present time, since so many key components/features are missing, it is
very difficult for us to take Indiana seriously. (If I begin to list the
missing key features, I will be instantly labeled a troll.)
Most of us are keenly aware the significance of the
Why did snv_b79 get skipped?
shhh .. no one talks about that one. Every family
has its problems and
generally we just try to sweep certain things under
the rug.
so, let's invite the right people to dinner and not
talk about this again
mmmkay ?
:-)
nnis
On Jan 29, 2008 6:34 PM, W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why did snv_b79 get skipped?
shhh .. no one talks about that one. Every family
has its problems and
generally we just try to sweep certain things under
the rug.
so, let's invite the right people to dinner and not
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Based what I have heard, I am going to skip builds 79 80 altogether, and
wait and go directly to 81.
Why wait? The SXCE Build 81 release has just been announced.
Cheers,
Jim
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
The download page appears to be broken, I get file
not found for x86
DVD part c.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Didn't have any problem here. We were able to get close
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
Thanks for the sincerity. Most of the problems I am having (for the time
being) are related to an incomplete X-infrastructure. I'll wait until the
first Indiana update iso comes out.
X infrastructure as in X Window System? I'd be interested in
knowing what you're
At the present time, since so many key
components/features are missing, it is
very difficult for us to take Indiana seriously.
(If I begin to list the
missing key features, I will be instantly labeled a
troll.)
Most of us are keenly aware the significance of the
Indiana project.
The download page appears to be broken, I get file
not found for x86
DVD part c.
Ian
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Didn't have any problem here. We were able to get close 5 Mb/s. In fact I
already
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 01:51:05PM +1300, Ian Collins wrote:
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:51:05 +1300
From: Ian Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] SXCE Build 80 Coming Next week
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org,
W. Wayne Liauh [EMAIL
Brand new Unlocked Sim Free Original Boxed, 12 months Manufacturer Warranty and
6 months return policy. Unit Price :250USD Package Contents
Nokia N95 8GB
Nokia Battery
Nokia Travel Charger AC-5
Nokia Music Headset HS-45,AD-54
Nokia Connectivity Cable DKE-2
Nokia Video Connectivity Cable
21 matches
Mail list logo
