Hi,
thanks for your ideas.
Normally my transfer of one byte needs about 3 - 4 microseconds (i have
mentioned). Sometimes we need up to 50 - 80 microseconds for one byte.
So i think other threads or processes gets the cpu and my driver was
interrupted.
I have done some dtrace tests, but up to no
Can anybody recommend a wireless adapter that works out-of-the-box with
OpenSolaris 2008.05? I tried going back to Slackware, but I miss ZFS from my
OpenSolaris test. Unfortunately, my current adapter (a Belkin F5D7050 v2000)
simply doesn't work with 2008.05. Here are my needs:
* 802.11g sup
Vikash Tulsiyan wrote:
> i understand that the packaging system is different and they have their own
> way of installing packages. What i cannot understand is why they are showing
> different versions for the same application.
> pkg info shows the version SUNWzlib as 1.2.3
> pkginfo -l shows th
Emmanuel De Paepe wrote:
>> * Note: OpenSolaris 2008.05 and SXCE will receive
>> updates to ON b93 very soon.
>>
>> ~ Ken Mays
>
> Does that mean that there will be a new iso available for OpenSolaris, like
> SXCE?
New ISO images are planned to come out sometime this summer as part of the
pre-r
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:01 PM, Emmanuel De Paepe
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Note: OpenSolaris 2008.05 and SXCE will receive
>> updates to ON b93 very soon.
>>
>> ~ Ken Mays
>
> Does that mean that there will be a new iso available for OpenSolaris, like
> SXCE?
I thought that the rumour was
> * Note: OpenSolaris 2008.05 and SXCE will receive
> updates to ON b93 very soon.
>
> ~ Ken Mays
Does that mean that there will be a new iso available for OpenSolaris, like
SXCE?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss ma
UNIX admin writes:
> Right. I wouldn't either. There are two possible reasons:
>
> - you did not install the SUNWscpu package
> - /usr/ucb is not in your PATH.
Most likely, he's installed OpenSolaris-the-distribution. That
doesn't install SUNWscpu by default.
Doing this should fix the problem:
wan_jm writes:
> I want to where the package information ( the result of pkginfo -l ) is
> placed.
>
> as I need to do upgrade S9 -> S10. after upgrade , I need to reuse the
> package installed on another disk. so I need to know where they are put, so
> that I can copy them to S10.
If you're g
I've noticed that the default installs basically put all remaining HD space in
the /export/home directory. I am curious why this is done? Every person I have
talked to says "redo the layout on install". If so many people redo the layout,
why do we default with no space left except in /export/hom
john kroll writes:
> Just one question not even sure who to reference it to; all of you guys are
> way out of my league. Once sx:ce becomes solaris11 : the bleeding edge of Sun
> will be solely opensolaris right??
There's certainly no guarantee that our marketing will launch a
product called "So
Reddy Prasad writes:
> I have downloaded sol-10-u5-ga-x86-dvd.iso from www.sun.com which is having
> 2,154.69 MB is this bootable file or just a file.
It's neither, really. It's a DVD image file. You'll need to use a
program that can burn DVDs and that can do so from an "ISO image."
> I want t
Saji Thankachan writes:
> I am new to solaris and need help to configure an application in Automatic
> startup in solaris 10, in rhel 5 I use the following which works fine.
>
> cp INSTALLDIR/scripts/gswgdaemon /etc/init.d/
> chmod 755 /etc/init.d/gswgdaemon
> cd /etc/init.d
> /sbin/chkconfig --a
Aniu jak najbardziej sa. dzisia nie ale jutro dostaniesz maila z haslem..
--
Michał Baranowski | System Administrator
CB Richard Ellis Polska Sp. z o.o | IT
Rondo 1 | Rondo ONZ 1 | 00-124 | Warsaw
DDI +48 22 544 8053 | F +48 22 544 8001| T +48 22 544 8000| M +48 501 634
> 1. Sun Studio 11/12
Shouldn't Sun Studio Express[1] be included in the list ?
[1] http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/IPS/instdevsoft.html#sunstudio
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 7:01 AM, Lars Tunkrans
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One more usage of swap is TMPFS .
>
> If you have lots of files in /tmp
> They use the swap area .
>
> //Lars
Remember swap is "RAM + swap devices". The notion that "/tmp is
mounted on swap" says that the backing s
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 6:15 AM, Frank Mancini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
>
> So are you saying the reason why I'm using so much swap is because
> one of my applications that I'm starting up is reserving this space?
Yes. Take a look at the output of "prstat -s size". It w
Hi,
I obviously cant judge how well you know the pitfalls of NFS and userID's
So what I say here may be old hat for you.
1) The UID ( userID. not login name ) needs to be the same for the
apache
user in all the servers.
check this with the "id" command.
Frank, thanks for the reply, I've managed to work out what the issue was. There
was no nscd running, so it had to go off to a remote name server each time to
resolve the process owner. 'svcadm enable name-service-cache' cleared things up.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
One more usage of swap is TMPFS .
If you have lots of files in /tmp
They use the swap area .
//Lars
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
蓖申藺___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Thanks for your reply.
So are you saying the reason why I'm using so much swap is because one of my
applications that I'm starting up is reserving this space?
I guess I always thought it reserved regular physical memory first, then
swapped later when physical runs out. So realistically, I can
On Sat, 5 Jul 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Siegfried Schmidt wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have written a driver for a special PCI Card on Solaris 10, Dual Core 2,4
>>> GHz.
>>> The application uses the driver via ioctl to get one byte fr
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Darren Archibald wrote:
> Has anyone encountered any issues with the 'ps -ef' command running really
> slow on a non-global zone ? Th ecommand runs instantly on the global zone,
> but takes around 1 minute to show all running proccesses on the local zone?
> Obviously need to
Has anyone encountered any issues with the 'ps -ef' command running really slow
on a non-global zone ? Th ecommand runs instantly on the global zone, but takes
around 1 minute to show all running proccesses on the local zone? Obviously
need to do some further investigation, but just wondered if
24 matches
Mail list logo
