Hi folks,
wanted to share some exciting news with you. Pogo Linux shipping
NexentaStor pre-installed boxes, like this one 16TB - 24TB:
http://www.pogolinux.com/quotes/editsys?sys_id=3989
And here is announce:
http://www.nexenta.com/corp/index.php?option=com_contenttask=viewid=129Itemid=56
Ming Kin Lai wrote:
Sun can write all the PR things they want to claim that they are not
abandoning Solaris. But let's look at the real stuff.
Like updates 1-5 and later 6?
If you have a Solaris question, use Usenet or your support channel.
Ian
Hello Ming
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:51 AM, Ming Kin Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sun can write all the PR things they want to claim that they are not
abandoning Solaris. But let's look at the real stuff. For example, I would
refer you to a thread How to report bugs ? in Sun's General
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Krenz von Leiberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Is it possible to read an external hard drive with an ext3 filesystem from
a redhat branded zone?
Thanks in advance.
No.
Branded zones run Solaris, but with Linux-lookalike APIs.
Therefore, no Linux kernel, and
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Johan Hartzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Krenz von Leiberman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to read an external hard drive with an ext3 filesystem from
a redhat branded zone?
Thanks in advance.
No.
Branded zones
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Mike Gerdts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Johan Hartzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Krenz von Leiberman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is it possible to read an external hard drive with an ext3 filesystem
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:27 PM, Mike Gerdts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 7:21 AM, Mike Gerdts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 4:55 AM, Johan Hartzenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Krenz von Leiberman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Leigh O'Neil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been tasked with trying to have SMF monitor our Peopelsoft instance.
In order to start the appserver I used a delivered compile module who, in our
instance starts 44 processes. Is SMF smart enough to recognize it
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Ming Kin Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a feeling that Sun has abandoned maintaining Solaris, and shifted
its resources to OpenSolaris. Well, that's good news to people here, I
guess.
So, can I discuss things about Solaris 10
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 11:05 AM, Roland Mainz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dennis Clarke wrote:
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:27 PM, Ming Kin Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a feeling that Sun has abandoned maintaining Solaris, and shifted
its resources to OpenSolaris. Well, that's good news
I performed a pkg image-update from os200805 ( snv_86 ? ) to snv_93
and my compilers are gone. In fact all of /opt is gone.
I ended up with *multiple* /opt filesystems from multiple opensolaris revs :
-bash-3.2# zfs list
NAMEUSED
AVAIL
A couple of questions might help to clarify the best way to get your
answer;
1) What are you trying to achieve;
- developing an application for enterprise deployment on Solaris 10
- personal use
- deploying Solaris 10 in a production environment
2) What do you want as a result of getting to
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 12:43 PM, Sherry Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Dennis,
Yes I have seen this. /opt was set up as a separate file system by the
installation process, and the canmount proterty was set to no (not
sure by which step yet), as a result post-upate /opt is no longer
Re: [osol-discuss] Can Solaris be discussed here?
From: Shawn Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Sat 8/02/08 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
These lists are for OpenSolaris, not Solaris. I'm not
certain what gave you the idea that Sun has
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 1:26 PM, Richard L. Hamilton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Re: [osol-discuss] Can Solaris be discussed here?
From: Shawn Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Sent: Sat 8/02/08 5:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
These lists are for OpenSolaris,
Hi all,
Anybody know where to get packages for some common
scientific programs such as:
R + packages
python + packages... numpy, scipy, pylab
fftw
some sort of tex distribution + packages
octave
I had my first exposure to Solaris as an undergrad
working in a computational biology
It is a choice-of-words issue on whether the word abandoning should be used.
But as hartz said, Sun is clearly diverting its resource to OpenSolaris. As to
how bad (as far as Solaris 10 is concerned) the diversion is, that's a
judgement call. Whereas one can point to all these Solaris 10
On Sat, Aug 2, 2008 at 4:23 PM, Ming Kin Lai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If asking for a way to report a bug resembles looking for free
support, well, I don't know what to say. ?If I have a product and
care about it, I would love people giving feedback and tell me
what's wrong about it. ?I too
I have found one:
page 10:
Stop the service.
# svcadm enable network/ssh
Are You writing it in Latex?
Any place to get the source of that book?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I am curious - how many people here in these OpenSolaris forums have
OpenSolaris installed on their PCs at home? Or are they mostly discussing
OpenSolaris problems they have at work/school? Does anyone have any idea?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Ming Kin Lai wrote:
I am curious - how many people here in these OpenSolaris forums have
OpenSolaris installed on their PCs at home? Or are they mostly discussing
OpenSolaris problems they have at work/school? Does anyone have any idea?
I think you'll find it a mix, really. I have a
Ming Kin Lai wrote:
It is a choice-of-words issue on whether the word abandoning should be
used. But as hartz said, Sun is clearly diverting its resource to
OpenSolaris. As to how bad (as far as Solaris 10 is concerned) the diversion
is, that's a judgment call.
I don't see a diversion
Ming Kin Lai wrote:
I am curious - how many people here in these OpenSolaris forums have
OpenSolaris installed on their PCs at home? Or are they mostly discussing
OpenSolaris problems they have at work/school? Does anyone have any idea?
I'm sure there are plenty that do. I know of
OK, let's say there is a fair number of people using OpenSolaris at home for
personal use. But as far as those bugs discussed in the forums here are
concerned, is it fair to say that most of the time these bugs arise out of
work-related problems?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
24 matches
Mail list logo
