I've done a pkg image-update from snv_101b_rc2 to the latest dev release.
I've gone through a couple of reboots (both init 6 and reboot), and the
new BE doesn't activate.
Here's the beadm list:
# beadm list
BEActive Mountpoint Space Policy Created
---- --
RBAC related:
Since I'm using the /usr/xpg4/bin path as the primary one, I was
little bit confused, that, event thought I have the Object
Access Management profile applied on my account, I'm not able
to use pfexec chown(1) command. Well, the reason is exactly
David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
However, you'll see people calmly stating gnu tar is broken and other
people (like me) saying it's the only tar I like to use, since all the
others I've tried seem to be feature-deficient. Whatever the brokenness
supposedly is, it hasn't bothered me.
I believe it is a mistake to concentrate on the GNU coreutils tools.
Opensolaris would alienate users from OSX and BSD platforms with an
API which roughly changes every six months. It'd be better if
Opensolaris starts its own Solaris coreutils project than being at the
GNU maintainers ''mercy''.
Add 'GNU coreutils don't support EUC locales' to that list. The tools
fail to decode paths with wide characters, breaking our products.
Irek
On 1/14/09, Nicolas Williams nicolas.willi...@sun.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:51:26AM -0800, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
The known bad
I. Szczesniak iszczesn...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe it is a mistake to concentrate on the GNU coreutils tools.
Opensolaris would alienate users from OSX and BSD platforms with an
API which roughly changes every six months. It'd be better if
Opensolaris starts its own Solaris coreutils
It would be better to go with the ATT AST tools
(http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/). AST supports many of the
BSD and GNU command line options missing in the native Solaris
userland and conform to POSIX.
Irek
On 1/14/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
How exactly? by
Joerg Schilling wrote:
This is what I ask for since a long time.
Unfortunately, Sun does not seem to be interested in this as I already
enhanced
and fixed several utilities but there was no interest from Sun.
You mean no interest in creating a Joerg-only contribution process since
you
To add bugs to the list, you simply have to file them in bugzilla on
defect.opensolaris.org, and list 576 in the bugs blocked field.
I don't know enough about this issue to write a good bug report,
but it sounds like you do.
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@sun.com
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
This is what I ask for since a long time.
Unfortunately, Sun does not seem to be interested in this as I already
enhanced
and fixed several utilities but there was no interest from Sun.
You mean no interest in
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
This is what I ask for since a long time.
Unfortunately, Sun does not seem to be interested in this as I already
enhanced
and fixed several utilities but there was no interest from Sun.
You mean no interest in creating a Joerg-only
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 04:31:03PM +0100, I. Szczesniak wrote:
I believe it is a mistake to concentrate on the GNU coreutils tools.
Opensolaris would alienate users from OSX and BSD platforms with an
API which roughly changes every six months. It'd be better if
Opensolaris starts its own
Here're my favs off the top of my head:
Between Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 and RHEL 5 /bin/tail changed,
breaking the JRE.
Output of /bin/ls changed between RHEL 3 and 4, using tab as
separator. Between RHEL 4 and 5 tab was removed again.
Names and spelling of long options changes. The GNU
C. Bergström cbergst...@netsyncro.com wrote:
Can we keep this positive and or just leave it at patches welcome..
Lets not have this thread suck up more time..
I am positive, as I am offering my work for free. The code even has been
published - I am not holding things back. What we need it
Am I the only one seeing the complete irony of someone posting from a
fraunhofer account talking about IP abuse? Google for fraunhofer mp3
patents for enlightenment
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Alan Coopersmith
It would be better to go with the ATT AST tools
(http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/). AST supports many of the
BSD and GNU command line options missing in the native Solaris
userland and conform to POSIX.
If those tools are truly compatible with the GNU variants and track
feature
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 11:56 AM, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
It would be better to go with the ATT AST tools
(http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/). AST supports many of the
BSD and GNU command line options missing in the native Solaris
userland and conform to POSIX.
If those tools are
One of the things that does kinda concern me here is that by just jumping on
the GNU bandwagon and hoping for a smooth ride is a bit backward. I think most
people who have worked on multiple OS's know that the GNU tools do have their
issues and conflicts. Ultimately, if Sun wants to improve
On Thu, January 15, 2009 12:51, Octave Orgeron wrote:
However, if the hope is that the GNU toolset will
attract users and developers.. I think that idea maybe a little flawed.
That's slightly off from what *I* am thinking (not speaking for anybody
except myself here). My point is that the
On Thu, January 15, 2009 12:57, Jason King wrote:
As I think has been mentioned before, I seriously doubt if you talk to
most any UNIX user they are one bit about GNU grep vs Solaris grep vs
BSD grep (or gnu tar vs solaris tar vs bsd tar vs star). What they
care about is 'grep -r works'
Octave Orgeron wrote:
One of the things that does kinda concern me here is that by just
jumping on the GNU bandwagon and hoping for a smooth ride is a bit
backward. I think most people who have worked on multiple OS's know
that the GNU tools do have their issues and conflicts. Ultimately, if
I did the google and I remain unenlightened. In fact, I would say it
is quite understandable that someone from fraunhofer would be
concerned, although I am not sure how much of Joerg attitude has to do
with having a fraunhofer account.
john g4lt wrote:
Am I the only one seeing the complete
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 12:56 PM, david.co...@sun.com wrote:
It would be better to go with the ATT AST tools
(http://www.research.att.com/sw/download/). AST supports many of the
BSD and GNU command line options missing in the native Solaris
userland and conform to POSIX.
If those tools are
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:51 PM, Octave Orgeron unixcons...@yahoo.com wrote:
One of the things that does kinda concern me here is that by just jumping on
the GNU bandwagon and hoping for a smooth ride is a bit backward. I think
most people who have worked on multiple OS's know that the GNU
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 2:27 PM, David Dyer-Bennet d...@dd-b.net wrote:
On Thu, January 15, 2009 12:51, Octave Orgeron wrote:
However, if the hope is that the GNU toolset will
attract users and developers.. I think that idea maybe a little flawed.
That's slightly off from what *I* am
Fredrich Maney wrote:
I want Sun and the Solaris and OpenSolaris communities to realize that
they have, bar none, the best OS on the planet
You're preaching to the choir :-)
it's the people who aren't in these communities that we want to convince,
and - or so I understand - giving them
Michael Schuster wrote:
Fredrich Maney wrote:
I want Sun and the Solaris and OpenSolaris communities to realize that
they have, bar none, the best OS on the planet
You're preaching to the choir :-)
it's the people who aren't in these communities that we want to convince,
and -
27 matches
Mail list logo
