I have a seriously bad problem with my OpenSolaris 2008.11 desktop. When I have
the num lock turned on and try to type in numbers with the numeric keypad on
the right hand side of the keyboard, it very slowly moves the mouse cursor
around. How do I turn this off?
I'm normally not a big
I am not sure if it is a USB hid driver issue. Did you really see this
issue on six different USB keyboards and mice you mentioned? Please send
me the output of the cmd line, echo ::prtusb -tv | mdb -k.
Regards,
Strony
Anon Y Mous :
I have a seriously bad problem with my OpenSolaris 2008.11
Maybe it's a feature, maybe...
http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-7282/6mda3k04h?a=view#dtconfig-14
See if you have that option checked.
Anon Y Mous wrote:
I have a seriously bad problem with my OpenSolaris 2008.11 desktop.
When I have the num lock turned on and try to type in numbers with
I notice that packages seem to come in three basic
flavors: Usr, Root, and Kernel.
Can someone explain what the precise differences are?
I assume that Usr is a userland package, Root
requires root privileges, and Kernel is a kernel
module. But I want to confirm that.
It's about
Many thanks from all of us for Godwinning this
pointless thread. It
needed to be done.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
From the link you posted:
The rule does not make any statement about whether any particular reference or
comparison to Adolf Hitler or the Nazis might be
And now those employees talk about 'fork'.
During their working hours at whatever the company
is?
I believe I was the first to write that I will fork OpenSolaris should I
perceive the need to do so.
I am not, and have never been an employee of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Also, you are assuming
Look at System Preferences Keyboard (Mouse keys tab)
See attached:
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Screenshot-Keyboard Preferences.png
Description: Binary data
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
I've just come accross QNAP TS-219
(http://www.qnap.com/pro_detail_feature.asp?p_id=113), which is an dual bay
storage system consuming only 20Watts during operation. It is based on an ARM
SOC, run by an open source operating system (not OpenSolaris), and has a bunch
of nice features
UNIX admin writes:
The r is the root portion of this component, payload which goes into /
(usually /etc/, which is in the / filesystem).
Then there is the u portion of the component, which goes into the /usr
filesystem.
Finally there is the kr portion of the component, which usually
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 1:45 PM, Thomas Maier-Komor
tho...@maier-komor.de wrote:
Has there been any discussion about porting OpenSolaris to ARM?
Yes, several times. See discussions about Polaris (only 49% wishful
thinking, thanks to Sun-Labs)
http://opensolaris.org/os/project/ppc-dev/
and the
I have a 6-disk RAIDZ2 on an AMD64 system with 2GBRAM. Using dd to read a 6GB
file to /dev/null, I get rates ranging from 35MB/s to 80MB/s. Worse, I see the
disk activity light go out regularly for a few seconds at a time, and fsstats
and iostats confirms the impression that there is
UNIX admin tripivc...@hotmail.com wrote:
The rule does not make any statement about whether any particular reference
or comparison to Adolf Hitler or the Nazis might be appropriate, but only
asserts that one arising is increasingly probable.
But in IBM's case, it seems very, very
[i] I believe I was the first to write that I will fork OpenSolaris should I
perceive the need to do so.
I am not, and have never been an employee of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Also, you are assuming that I'm writing this during my work, which might or
might not be correct, but is nevertheless an
Senti, perdona la mia ignoranza ma non so come scriverti in privato.
Per tutti i partecipanti all'incontro:
Giovedi 26 sarò a Milano intorno alle 20 insieme ad un nuovo amico di O.Sol.
Se va bene ci vediamo direttamente qui:Kapuziner Platz
Viale Monte Nero, 34
20135 Milano (MI)
02 54101270?
Zoltan Farkas wrote:
Hmm, I will disagree here, IBM is a business, and as such they will always look
to maximize revenue.
Currently they resell Redhat Linux, If they buy Sun, they will pretty much own
Solaris.
Do the math... what brigs them more money? Selling Solaris or reselling Linux?
I
*SourceJuicer v1.0 Released - March 24th 2009*
http://jucr.opensolaris.org
SourceJuicer is a web application , designed for the community, whose
goal is to simplify contributions to OpenSolaris. This application is
the gateway into the community IPS repositories. From today,
SourceJuicer
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris enough so that it could
fit into 8MB of flash or would that require spinning of an embedded version
which makes a lot of compromises?
You might have a look at MilaX and BeleniX.
But 8MB??? Forget about it.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:02 PM, C. codest...@osunix.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris enough so that it
could fit into 8MB of flash or would that require spinning of an embedded
version which makes a lot of compromises?
You might have a
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:12 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:02 PM, C. codest...@osunix.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
...
Not true.. Milax I think can get down to 24M and still has a lot of kernel
modules/drivers which could be parsed out. There's
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 4:02 PM, C. codest...@osunix.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris enough so that it
could fit into 8MB of flash or would that require spinning of an embedded
version which makes a lot of
100% agreed. I think, if you put the number of posts
and contributors in relationship to those with
financial support from Sun, or an employer-employee
relationship, empirical evidence might evolve that
supports my lines. But this is not the most relevant
thing.
You are implying that if
Anon Y Mous wrote:
I have a seriously bad problem with my OpenSolaris 2008.11 desktop. When I
have the num lock turned on and try to type in numbers with the numeric
keypad on the right hand side of the keyboard, it very slowly moves the mouse
cursor around. How do I turn this off?
Sounds
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, C. codest...@osunix.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris enough so that it
could fit into 8MB of flash or would that require spinning of an embedded
version which makes a lot of compromises?
You might have a
Moinak Ghosh schrieb:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, C. codest...@osunix.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris enough so that it
could fit into 8MB of flash or would that require spinning of an embedded
version which makes a lot of
Well, I guess for embedded applications it's fine to remove DTrace, mdb,
and friends.
- Thomas
How do you port (to a new ISA), develop and debug - cycle then?
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Thomas Maier-Komor
tho...@maier-komor.de wrote:
Moinak Ghosh schrieb:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, C. codest...@osunix.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris enough so that it
could fit into 8MB of flash or
Martin Bochnig schrieb:
Well, I guess for embedded applications it's fine to remove DTrace, mdb,
and friends.
- Thomas
How do you port (to a new ISA), develop and debug - cycle then?
The 8MB Flash limit is on a production target. For development you
usually use a target that doesn't have
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Maier-Komor
tho...@maier-komor.de wrote:
Martin Bochnig schrieb:
How do you port (to a new ISA), develop and debug - cycle then?
The 8MB Flash limit is on a production target. For development you
usually use a target that doesn't have such strict
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 9:24 PM, Thomas Maier-Komor
tho...@maier-komor.de wrote:
Moinak Ghosh schrieb:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, C. codest...@osunix.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down OpenSolaris
UNIX admin wrote:
You are implying that if those employees were laid off, they would stop
working on Solaris, and that Solaris development would therefore be severely
impaired.
Since we have no hard data which states how many Sun employees would keep
working on Solaris on a completely
On 3/23/09, Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@sun.com wrote:
ольга крыжановская wrote:
The community cannot survive without open code. Many parts of
Opensolaris rely on closed sources. We need an emergency project to
make as many parts of Opensolaris open source or replace them with
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/emancipation/
Hey! The ksh93 project already has replacements for the closed
commands, now even including /usr/bin/pax.
star is a pax replacement for a long time already.
Jörg
--
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/emancipation/
Hey! The ksh93 project already has replacements for the closed
commands, now even including
+1
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/emancipation/
Hey! The
On 3/24/09, Martin Bochnig mar...@martux.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/emancipation/
Hey! The ksh93 project already
On 3/24/09, Hernan Saltiel hsalt...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
-1 for star
Jenny
--
Jennifer Pioch, Uni Frankfurt
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
Why? AST pax is the original pax which supports more file formats than star.
AST pax is not the original pax.
The early POSIX.1-1988 drafts in 1987 did only include tar. USG (ATT) did come
up with the wish to add cpio around 1988. This
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3/24/09, Hernan Saltiel hsalt...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
-1 for star
-1 for Jennifer Pioch as you do not give reasons.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de
On 3/24/09, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3/24/09, Hernan Saltiel hsalt...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
-1 for star
-1 for Jennifer Pioch as you do not give reasons.
star is not going to be integrated
Hi,
Can anyone out there shed some light on the utrace library in solaris and how
to implement it in solaris.If you can provide any info or links it would be
really helpful
Ciao
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
You wish to talk to Roland Mainz, Glenn Fowler and
Jennifer Pioch
then. They have opensource replacements for
/usr/bin/sed,
/usr/xpg4/bin/sed, /usr/bin/tail, /usr/xpg4/bin/tail,
/usr/bin/tr and
/usr/xpg4/bin/tr.
is this a joke? Wherever could they find such precious and novel work?
Hi all,
I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a new
directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64 versions of
acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc version.
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/
Paul
Miles Nordin wrote:
You wish to talk to Roland Mainz, Glenn Fowler and
Jennifer Pioch
then. They have opensource replacements for
/usr/bin/sed,
/usr/xpg4/bin/sed, /usr/bin/tail, /usr/xpg4/bin/tail,
/usr/bin/tr and
/usr/xpg4/bin/tr.
is this a joke? Wherever could they find such precious and
Hi all --
In which SXCE did the executable mkcd fall off the distro but not the
man page???
I had not used it in a while, but it seems that at least in b110 there
is a man entry for it pointing to /usr/bin/mkcd but no one is home there...
rich
Miles Nordin wrote:
The thing I'd worry about most in such a catastrophe, would be forgetting
something. Has anyone actually mirrored all the branches in hg? Is it even
possible? Or you just expect it to be there?
Yes things are mirrored.. if people actually read the whole damn thread
C. codest...@osunix.org wrote:
http://hg.osunix.org/osunix-gate/
hourly mirrored and merged thanks kindly to bitbucket.org
If there will be problems, it will immediately appear on berlios.de too.
In a few weeks, the Berlios successor will be ready with a lot of space.
The 900 MB ON do not
Alan C. and Che, you guys were right! It was a feature in System - Preferences
that some how got accidentally turned on. It's weird that I've never had this
problem before in any other Linux or BSD distro using GNOME, but then again I'm
a command line guy, so I'm pretty awkward when it comes to
I must say that I'm very discouraged to continue on these opensolaris-*
lists in the future. I think a few years ago when the program was first
inspired it was a community of optimism and less negativity. Proposed
constitution changes, acquisition rumors, and various other events
lately
I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a new
directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64 versions of
acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc version.
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/
I haven't tried downloading and installing
Anon Y Mous wrote:
I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a
new directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64
versions of acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc
version. ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/
I haven't tried
I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a new
directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64 versions of
acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc version.
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/
I haven't tried downloading and
I just decided to check Adobe's ftp directory for acroreader and a new
directory was posted for v9.1. It contains both x86 and x64 versions of
acroreader. What it does not contain is a Sparc version.
ftp://ftp.adobe.com/pub/adobe/reader/unix/9.x/9.1/enu/
I haven't tried downloading and
52 matches
Mail list logo
