Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down
OpenSolaris enough so that it could fit into 8MB of
flash or would that require spinning of an embedded
version which makes a lot of compromises?
You might have a look at MilaX and BeleniX.
But 8MB??? Forget about
Moinak Ghosh schrieb:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 8:32 PM, C.
codest...@osunix.org wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
Would it be possible at all to strip down
OpenSolaris enough so that it
could fit into 8MB of flash or would that
require spinning of an embedded
version which makes a lot of
[i]and yes, it works[/i]
and yes, it prints A4! (Evince doesn't)
Thanks for the link!
Uwe
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
[i]Actually this project is composed of many different projects of their own,
some of which are comparable to ONNV itself in size and complexity. If you look
at the projects page, and look at the ONNV change logs, you will see what I
mean.[/i]
Exactly.
So we have an nwam that cannot support
Hi all,
I'm playing with this wonderful opportunity of Opensolaris, the Zones.
I manage to create and configure a zone, but when I try to install it, it
searches the web to download packages, like below:
# zoneadm -z zone_name install
A ZFS file system has been created for this zone.
Authority:
Let's wait. I remember some rumors about secret indiana project. In that time
some people thought that indiana is java-project. May be deal will be done only
with some part of SUN because JS continues saying about OpenSource future
We should all head over to Adobe's acroread blog and post comments thanking
them for this...we've done enough whining, we may as well show our gratitude :-P
http://blogs.adobe.com/acroread/
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
Exactly.
So we have an nwam that cannot support more than a
single interface,
we cannot (semi-officially) have more than one link
to the same gateway (because that's rocket-science),
we can't print A4 to an A4-sheet from Gnome (at
least),
quite a few machines hang at boot,
we have
Hi All,
Systemics Poland (http://www.systemics.pl) and Bruning Systems
(http://www.bruningsystems.com) are holding an OpenSolaris Internals
class on May 4-8 at the Systemics site in Warsaw. The course will be
taught in English. For pricing and availability, please contact
Magdalena
sqrt() for every number = 0 here
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3/24/09, Hernan Saltiel hsalt...@gmail.com wrote:
+1
-1 for star
-1 for Jennifer Pioch as you do not give reasons.
Jörg
--
| Regards,
| Alexander 'Sasa' Vlasov.
| Solaris
[i] As long as a Unix sysadmin
encounters problems thereby, it is more urgent to
iron out those problems.
Yes, and that is good so. Do you know why? I will tell you.[/i]
Funny enough, you tell the person why he is doing what he does.
Maybe his reason is different, though? Maybe it is because
Funny enough, you tell the person why he is doing
what he does.
Maybe his reason is different, though? Maybe it is
because he cares?
Your enthusiasm never was in question. I was merely pointing out why it is good
that problems noticed by UNIX admins are ironed out with a higher priority
J?rg, I don't recall if you were at the 1986 Denver usenix discussions that
yielded pax, but the rancor of the tar/cpio discussions up to that point
made it clear that a single tar or single cpio only solution would
be impossible -- basically a hung jury
since most of the disagreement was on the
cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org on-disc...@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: Re: [ksh93-integration-discuss] [osol-discuss] [on-discuss]
Emergency project to rescue Opensolaris from IBM (was: Re: Possible IBM
aquisition of Sun)
Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
Hi,
The X64 passes the first six arguments in registers %rdi, %rsi, Can I
use one compiler option like -save_args to store argments in stack like what
the i386 does?
I tried this option, but it's failed. The logs are here:
cc -O -g -save_args -m64 -c -o cpc.o cpc.c
cc: -a
David Korn d...@research.att.com wrote:
Not to mention that it was star, Solaris added the lseek(f, pos, SEEK_HOLE)
for
to allow star to archive 100% accurate holey files.
Since pax is implemented using the sfio library for stdio it also
handles files with holes. In fact the AST cp
Glenn Fowler g...@research.att.com wrote:
J?rg, I don't recall if you were at the 1986 Denver usenix discussions that
yielded pax, but the rancor of the tar/cpio discussions up to that point
made it clear that a single tar or single cpio only solution would
be impossible -- basically a hung
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 11:47 AM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Glenn Fowler g...@research.att.com wrote:
J?rg, I don't recall if you were at the 1986 Denver usenix discussions that
yielded pax, but the rancor of the tar/cpio discussions up to that point
made it
Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
why are we having this argument? I believe it leads nowhere. Any open
source tool aiming to replace the closed bits should just go through
formal review like the rest of the changes do. These discussions are a
waste of time and bandwidth
star
Ignacio Marambio Cat=E1n darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
why are we having this argument? I believe it leads nowhere. Any op=
en
source tool aiming to replace the closed bits should just go throug=
h
formal review like the rest of the changes do. These discussions ar=
e a
waste of time and
And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test
packages provided? someone at sun checked them for compliance and code
review? why? why not?
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 12:06 PM, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test
packages provided? someone at sun checked them for compliance and code
review? why? why not?
Jörg is only interested in trolling and vaporware announcements. He's
On 3/25/09, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
why are we having this argument? I believe it leads nowhere. Any open
source tool aiming to replace the closed bits should just go through
formal review like the rest
This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true, wasnt he the
one that created the first opensolaris distribution with schillix? i'd
say that ia a fairly big contribution because i'm sure others built
from that work.
2009/3/25 Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com:
On 3/25/09,
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test
packages provided? someone at sun checked them for compliance and code
review? why? why not?
Jörg is only
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true,
When did Jörg contribute a line of code which is now part of ON or
SFW? Time, date and location, please.
Really, I'm upset about Jörgs flame wars, spitting and pissing against
Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true, wasnt he the
one that created the first opensolaris distribution with schillix? i'd
say that ia a fairly big contribution because i'm sure others built
from that work.
thank you for
For me, finishing the star integration is some kind of
verification on whether OpenSolaris is a project where it is possible to
implement previous agreements - so it is a matter of credibility of the
OpenSolaris project.
For you, yes. For others it's probably not that important.
As you are
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true,
Noises deleted
If Jörg continues this path I'd propose to throw Mr. Jörg out of
opensolaris.
I agree that *someone* should be banned out of the OpenSolaris
community
On 3/25/09, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true,
Noises deleted
If Jörg continues this path I'd propose to throw Mr. Jörg out of
opensolaris.
I agree
Please, flame wars get us nowhere and in fact distract everyone from our
real purpose here, which is (for the most part) writing code. Let's not
bicker and argue about who killed who, and instead just get back to work.
-- John
http://blogs.sun.com/jbeck
On 3/25/09, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test
packages provided? someone at sun
casper@sun.com wrote:
For me, finishing the star integration is some kind of
verification on whether OpenSolaris is a project where it is possible to
implement previous agreements - so it is a matter of credibility of the
OpenSolaris project.
For you, yes. For others it's probably not
Couldn't agree more, let's get back to coding and finding ways to grow
the community.
CommunityOne East was last week, Ben gave an update on ZFS as well as
the OpenSolaris Bible authors talking about becoming Power Users, we
even had the team from Toshiba there showing off their laptops
Ok,
so what release or brand do I use so that the zone gets the packages from the
global zone when installing. Or is there another way to do so?
Thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:18:17 +0100, Josh Hurst wrote:
FYI joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
has been banned from the
kernel.org and Freebsd lists, maybe Opensolaris should do the same.
And?A! Bingo! Eat s**t – a zillion flies can’t be wrong.
--
Best regards,
Cemasko Viktor.
Hi,
I have a problem with my OpenSolaris 2008.11 and my nvidia GeForce 9600 GSO. OS
only wants to use the vgta-text driver, so I tried to use the installed
nvidia-package bye running nvidia-xconfig, but it only shows me a white screen
and i have to rm /etc/X11/xorg.conf. Then I tried to use
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Josh Hurst joshhu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/25/09, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true,
Noises deleted
If Jörg continues
If Jörg continues this path I'd propose to throw Mr.
Jörg out of opensolaris.
I do not respect/trust Joerg as much as some others, either, because of the
whole ProDVD mess, but feel far more comfortable cooperating with an old crabby
person than someone who proposes to ``throw people out.''
+1
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:31:30 +0100, Miles Nordin wrote:
[...]
I do respect/trust Jörg, but I agree with your thought.
--
Best regards,
Viktor Cemasko.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Josh Hurst joshhu...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3/25/09, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
[snip]
Flame wars should be fought privately, if at all.
speaking_as_list_admin
* First:
I would _STRONGLY_ prefer to keep all non-technical
Yes things are mirrored..
http://hg.osunix.org/osunix-gate/
thanks, that's awesome!
Also realize that there's more sources/patches and a
lot of other things which are mirrored as well since onnv-gate alone
won't build itself.
You are saying that osunix-gate contains a lot more than
I don't know who Jennifer is, but I think everyone who's had more than
passing experience with either Solaris or OpenSolaris knows that Joerg
has made some real contributions. While Jennifer's comments are
unfortunate, I don't think they are representative of any community, and
I think all
Miles Nordin carton-...@ivy.net wrote:
If Jörg continues this path I'd propose to throw Mr.
Jörg out of opensolaris.
I do not respect/trust Joerg as much as some others, either, because of the
whole ProDVD
mess, ...
I recommend you not to listen to the people who started this campaign.
Miles Nordin wrote:
You wish to talk to Roland Mainz, Glenn Fowler and
Jennifer Pioch
then. They have opensource replacements for
/usr/bin/sed,
/usr/xpg4/bin/sed, /usr/bin/tail, /usr/xpg4/bin/tail,
/usr/bin/tr and
/usr/xpg4/bin/tr.
is this a joke?
No, this is no joke. I am in the
Garrett D'Amore writes:
I don't know who Jennifer is, but I think everyone who's had more than
passing experience with either Solaris or OpenSolaris knows that Joerg
has made some real contributions. While Jennifer's comments are
unfortunate, I don't think they are representative of any
Jennifer Pioch said:
If Jörg continues this path I'd propose to throw Mr. Jörg out of opensolaris.
FYI: I don't think it's right for anybody to belittle or deprecate Joerg's
contributions to Solaris / OpenSolaris and to the broader community of
Unix-like operating systems (which includes Linux
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Hubert Kah
nasty.stud...@googlemail.com wrote:
pci bus 0x0001 cardnum 0x00 function 0x00: vendor 0x10de device 0x0625
nVidia Corporation Device unknown
So, I think i have to do this:
# update_drv -a -i 'pci10de,625″' nvidia
I get no errors, but I have the
Miles Nordin wrote:
Yes things are mirrored..
http://hg.osunix.org/osunix-gate/
thanks, that's awesome!
Also realize that there's more sources/patches and a
lot of other things which are mirrored as well since onnv-gate alone
won't build itself.
You are saying that osunix-gate
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Anon Y Mous system5u...@yahoo.com wrote:
Jennifer Pioch said:
If Jörg continues this path I'd propose to throw Mr. Jörg out of opensolaris.
FYI: I don't think it's right for anybody to belittle or deprecate Joerg's
contributions to Solaris / OpenSolaris and
hi all --
anyone else having issues with b110 of SXCE??? I wget the ISO from
the SDLC and unzip it to find a directory of stuff, not unlike the
install media, but NOT an ISO...
ok... so just think a little different and point luupgrade at the
directory... .install_config is not the
Hi Rich.
I'm looking into it now. Can you give the specific path you gave for
wget? Or what you chose for image type (SPARC or x86, single or split
image)?
-- Alan
Rich Reynolds wrote:
hi all --
anyone else having issues with b110 of SXCE??? I wget the ISO from
the SDLC and unzip it
followed the wget workaround as pointed to by derek's osol announcement...
wget -O bleen
I must say that I'm very discouraged to continue on these opensolaris-*
lists in the future.
Don't be discouraged. I think all the noisy, raucous heated debates we've been
having here are signs that we actually have a healthy community and not a
dead one. Look at nature- living things evolve
You know, all action, and soap opera drama that's going on is actually getting
me more interested and more excited OpenSolaris and UNIX in general. I might
have to register soon under my real name and contribute some of the packages
I've been working on compiling to one of the package
I must say that I'm very discouraged to continue on
these opensolaris-*
lists in the future.
You must NOT have been with this forum for very long. Believe me, we are much
now better than when we first started, or even just a couple of years ago. :-)
--
This message posted from
It's like those cliff-hanger endings they have in TV
shows. will IBM acquire SUN? will Joerg and
Jennifer patch things up and go Schuhplattler dancing
together?
haha! man, that was funny =)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
. . . Milax I think can get down to 24M . . .
./Christopher
---
Community driven OpenSolaris Technology -
http://www.osunix.org
blog: http://www.codestrom.com
How did you come out with this number?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
It's here!
Please see
http://blogs.adobe.com/acroread/2009/03/adobe_reader_91_for_linux_and.html
-Gaurav
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
60 matches
Mail list logo
