> enough of the iPhone's low-level hardware interface has been reverse
> engineered to > get the MilaX up and running
You are a genius!
If we could get an extremely miniaturized, stripped down to the bone version of
the Solaris kernel on embedded devices (without the features not necessary for
>Frankly I know about Linux scaling issues from a IBM white paper... So I am
>not that convinced about their Linux love
Can you post the link to the IBM white paper about Linux scalability issues? I
work as a Linux admin for a living because that's where all the hype and
developer mindshare is,
Many months after the beginning of the project, enough of the iPhone's
low-level hardware interface has been reverse engineered to get the MilaX up
and running. Yes, MilaX now runs on the iPhone (only console mode on 1st
gen/2nd gen, and the 1st gen iPod Touch). This is a rough first draft of th
> Sorry, that is the wrong type of disk.
> Perhaps the latest version will help. Let me get back to you on that.
> Dennis
I heard rumors that SMART tools don't work well with most SATA disks / SATA
controllers in Solaris. Anybody know if this is true? I've been wanting to
experiment with buildin
Hi,
Andre Boegelsack wrote:
Hi to everyone,
I hope you might be able to help me. I'm running several CPU and memory intensive load tests on my machine. I've installed a Sun Developer Express edition and several virtual machine with the same operating system.
Now I'm interested in what the hyp
Hi All,
This is to announce availability of NexentaCore Platform 2.0 RC1.
The interesting feature addition in this release is experimental
128-bit processor support.
Further information at http://www.nexenta.org/os/x86_128_support
We've also fixed many bug and resolved issues since the last beta
My setup:
Athlon64 2.2Ghz 3400+|Aopen AK86-L mobo|(Topped out at 3GB ram)
4 500gb IDE drvs on IDE builtin controllers
2 750 gb Sata II on PCI sata controller
(Adaptec 1205sa (Sil3112a chip)
Currently running: SunOS 5.11 snv_110 i86pc
= * = * = * = * = * =
Sun can only be bought if the owners(shareholders) agree.
If you want to have a say in all this you need to be a shareholder
Sun(java) is a publicly traded company, its easy to become one.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
> My setup:
> Athlon64 2.2ghz 3400+ - AK86-L Aopen mobo (Topped out at 3gb ram)
> 4 500gb IDE drives on IDE controllers
> 2 750gb SATA drives on PCI sata controller
> (adaptec 1205sa [Sil3112a chip])
> Currently: osol-2008.11 build 110
> = * = * = * =
>
>
Harry Putnam writes:
> /opt/csw/sbin/smartctl -a /dev/rdsk/c5d0s0
> smartctl version 5.36 [i386-pc-solaris2.8] Copyright (C) 2002-6 Bruce Allen
> Home page is http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net/
Gackkk... sorry I didn't understand the bit about -T
A mandatory SMART command failed: exiting. To
My setup:
Athlon64 2.2ghz 3400+ - AK86-L Aopen mobo (Topped out at 3gb ram)
4 500gb IDE drives on IDE controllers
2 750gb SATA drives on PCI sata controller
(adaptec 1205sa [Sil3112a chip])
Currently: osol-2008.11 build 110
= * = * = * =
[...]
Sorry to
This is why Oracle kicks their ass. All oracle products are free to download
and develop for...
Frankly I know about Linux scaling issues from a IBM white paper... So I am not
that convinced about their Linux love, Linux is also something their biggest
competitors (not Sun) are embracing... th
>
> [...]
>
> Dennis wrote:
>> You can find SMARTmontools at :
>>
>> i386: http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/
>>
>> smartmontools-5.36,REV=2006.09.11-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>>
>> sparc : http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/sparc/5.11/
>>
>> smartmontools-5.3
[...]
Dennis wrote:
> You can find SMARTmontools at :
>
> i386: http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/i386/5.11/
>
> smartmontools-5.36,REV=2006.09.11-SunOS5.8-i386-CSW.pkg.gz
>
> sparc : http://blastwave.network.com/csw/unstable/sparc/5.11/
>
> smartmontools-5.36,REV=2006.09.11
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Shawn Walker wrote:
> Martin Bochnig wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Fredrich Maney
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I don't believe the issue is that he is using a Mac laptop, but that
>>> he is using OSX instead of Solaris/OpenSolaris. Sun (sadly) doesn't
>>> mak
Martin Bochnig wrote:
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Fredrich Maney wrote:
I don't believe the issue is that he is using a Mac laptop, but that
he is using OSX instead of Solaris/OpenSolaris. Sun (sadly) doesn't
make laptops, so he is obviously going to use another vendor's product
for that.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Fredrich Maney wrote:
> I don't believe the issue is that he is using a Mac laptop, but that
> he is using OSX instead of Solaris/OpenSolaris. Sun (sadly) doesn't
> make laptops, so he is obviously going to use another vendor's product
> for that. However Sun does
I don't believe the issue is that he is using a Mac laptop, but that
he is using OSX instead of Solaris/OpenSolaris. Sun (sadly) doesn't
make laptops, so he is obviously going to use another vendor's product
for that. However Sun does make operating systems that can run on
other vendor's laptops, s
Eugene Turkulevich wrote:
> I want to run mpd as daemon, I run it under mpd user, audio group and try to
> change ownerwhip/permissions for /dev/audio device: chgrp audio /dev/audio;
> chmod g+rw /dev/audio
> but, after any relogon /dev/audio change owner to logged on user and restore
> permissi
I want to run mpd as daemon, I run it under mpd user, audio group and try to
change ownerwhip/permissions for /dev/audio device: chgrp audio /dev/audio;
chmod g+rw /dev/audio
but, after any relogon /dev/audio change owner to logged on user and restore
permissions to default (group no read/write
no, but it does show community/customer support!!!
rich
Alexander Vlasov wrote:
Well, feel free to consider this flame, but I haven't seen any business
decision being influenced by online petition.
Octave Orgeron wrote:
I don't mean to stir up any flame wars or for this to be spam. I setup
a
Totally agree,
No complaining here...and look at all the great stuff coming up (Boomer,
Coherence, Elisa). OpenSolaris is
kicking ass on the desktop!
Let's hope more of an "ecosystem" builds up around us in addition to the basics
(Flash, acroread, Fluendo
plugins)
On Tue 31/03/09 17:52 , Den
Well, feel free to consider this flame, but I haven't seen any business
decision being influenced by online petition.
Octave Orgeron wrote:
I don't mean to stir up any flame wars or for this to be spam. I setup a
petition for people to sign to show support for Sun staying independent:
http://
I don't mean to stir up any flame wars or for this to be spam. I setup a
petition for people to sign to show support for Sun staying independent:
http://www.petitiononline.com/smi09/petition.html
I just ask that people show their support for Sun taking the high-road and
working through these t
Hmm was thinking about that think its down to time and desktop real estate
decisions.Decreasing the size maybe the ansawer..
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Lets say this is not a good idea
Would exsun employees be able to set up a Non Profit Organisation called
Opensolaris foundation? Maybe the community can be offered non voting shares at
$100 to get things rolling? Seek a revenue model and sponsorship? Set up a
dollar repository on the web to en
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Zoltan Farkas wrote:
> Look at his blog, and you will notice the macOS screen shots,
> I attempted to post a comment about how I think as a Sun CEO he should use
> every opportunity to promote Sun products... my post was censored and did not
> go through... I am
On 03/31/09 16:08, Zoltan Farkas wrote:
Look at his blog, and you will notice the macOS screen shots,
I attempted to post a comment about how I think as a Sun CEO he should use
every opportunity to promote Sun products... my post was censored and did not
go through... I am wondering why...
he
Look at his blog, and you will notice the macOS screen shots,
I attempted to post a comment about how I think as a Sun CEO he should use
every opportunity to promote Sun products... my post was censored and did not
go through... I am wondering why...
he should install opensolaris on his macbook
Authorizations are part of the RBAC framework in solaris, you might
want to start reading there
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 11:38 AM, Hanma wrote:
> I can't understand what to do to authorise the user. I can't understand this
> -A authorization
> One or more comma separated authorizations defined in
Hi all,
I'm trying to use an opensolaris (2008.11 at snv110 level) setup to boot a
windows image from an iscsi target along these lines:
http://etherboot.org/wiki/pxechaining
I'm not able to find a way to have a conditional answer from opensolaris DHCP
server.
I can aswer the PXE rom request
I can't understand what to do to authorise the user. I can't understand this
-A authorization
One or more comma separated authorizations defined in auth_attr(4). Only a user
or role who has grant rights to the authorization can assign it to an account.
what I must to write after -A? Please give m
We have made one modification to the 1.8 version of zonemgr in order to pass
arguments for the zone inherited-packages configuration and not only the
default ones. Is there someone who can be interessed by this modification?
Perhaps by including this to the future version.
--
This message post
Hanma wrote:
can somebody give me an example of authorisation using -A in terminal? or how
can I authorise user by terminal?
Have you tried seraching here?
http://docs.sun.com
Also you may want to consider buying a book or onlie tutorial that helps
you get started. Maybe someone can reco
can somebody give me an example of authorisation using -A in terminal? or how
can I authorise user by terminal?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> thanks for the hint - i thought sata would be always hot-pluggable.
> i checked the specs for 3114 and they tell it supports hot-plug:
> http://www.siliconimage.com/products/product.aspx?pid=28
Regardless of what the manual says - because I've seen so many times that
the manual says some hardwar
Just install on ibm x3650 (7979) 4xSAS
dd if=/dev/null of=/dev/dsk/c3t0d0 bs=1024k count=1024
88 Mb/s
zpool create zdata c3t0d0 c3t1d0 c3t2d0 c3t3d0
zfs create zdata/test
dd if=/dev/null of=/zdata/test/io bs=1024k count=1024
222 Mb/s
zpool create zdata raidz c3t0d0 c3t1d0 c3t2d0 c3t3d0
zfs create z
Hi to everyone,
I hope you might be able to help me. I'm running several CPU and memory
intensive load tests on my machine. I've installed a Sun Developer Express
edition and several virtual machine with the same operating system.
Now I'm interested in what the hypervisor is doing. Therefore I
If you want good ZFS performance you have to be running a 64 bit kernel... On a
32 bit system it'll be slow.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Test platform
P4 1Gb 4xIDE DISKS
opensolaris installed on c0t1
first, get performance system bus
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null bs=8K count=125000
= 2.6Gb/s
get performance raw device
dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/dsk/c0d1 bs=8K count=125000
= 40 Mb/s
create zfs (raidz) on c0d1 c1d0 c1d1
mount as zdata/te
how to use -A in useradd ? How to authorise user in terminal?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
41 matches
Mail list logo
