Hi Akhil,
You can print variables inside a funtion using dtrace only if there is a
dtrace probe 'exposing' it. If this is an application for which you have
source, then you could add USDT probes in it. See
http://blogs.sun.com/barts/entry/putting_user_defined_dtrace_probe for
adding probes
Hi all,
This is Johnny. I wanna ask you for a question about Solaris 10 IP
package sending:
We have a SPARC machine with Solaris 10 installed on it. 2 interfaces,
bge0 and nxge0, are connected to the same sub-net(192.168.1.0,
255.255.255.0), with IP address 192.168.1.2 on bge0 and 192.168.1.3 on
Jürgen Keil wrote:
Please see the attached output from the top command.
It reports 100% CPU, even though the listed processes
add up to nowhere near that.
Although the user and kernel values do change,
they always add up to 100%.
Load is high; and there are quite a few context switches,
The USB storage it is talking about must be a multi-card reader built in to the
system case, which is connected internally to the USB headers on the
motherboard, so I can't really test that.
If it's a known bug, do you know what release it will be fixed in so I know
when it's safe to let
Running that gives me:
dtrace: failed to compile script /usr/demo/dtrace/whoexec.d: Invalid library
dependency in /usr/lib/dtrace/iscsit.d: /usr/lib/dtrace/iscsi.d
However, running
truss -f -texecve -p `pgrep gnome-session`
as Ghee suggested reveals that vino-server keeps failing:
4422:
Dear Friends:
Want to setup VoIP company, a business under your own brand name? We have
complete solution to launche VoIP (Voice Over Internet Protocol) company. All
support comes included.
Features: PC2Phone, Device2Phone, Calling Card, Callback,sms callback solution,
Ani Callback solution,
Hi Johnny,
Basically, this is how IP routing works and was always intended to
work. It's destination based. You can force your desired behaviour
with static host routes or ipfilter rules. See the following
previous discussions for more detail:
Alexander wrote:
I see wine package in contrib rep:
http://pkg.opensolaris.org/contrib/info/0/wine%401.0.1%2C5.11-0.101%3A20081209T223210Z
But I have 2 questions:
1) Why is it so big (111 Mb against ~ 10 Mb of Ubuntu deb package)
I suspect it hasn't been stripped of debugging symbols.
2)
Also see http://blogs.sun.com/carlson/ for the 30 April 2009 entry. Thanks for
all the info, James!!!
Steffen
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
I upgraded to snv_111, and now some of my zones have a problem trying to
install packages. I've tried SUNWj6rt, SUNWapach and SUNWtop. All give the same
error:
Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/pkg, line 2228, in ?
__ret = main_func()
File /usr/bin/pkg,
I upgraded to snv_111, and now some of my zones have a problem trying to
install packages
Did you also upgrade the zones? It's not done automatically through
image-update on the global zone.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
John Ryan wrote:
Hi,
I upgraded to snv_111, and now some of my zones have a problem trying to
install packages. I've tried SUNWj6rt, SUNWapach and SUNWtop. All give the same
error:
Creating Plan -Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/pkg, line 2228, in ?
__ret = main_func()
I can confirm that wine version works for me.
Have you got Spotify running on it?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Johnny,
I don't know if they still do it but older sparc machines would force the same
mac address on all nics in the machine. There is an OBP variable that will undo
this feature and allow the router to pass the ICMP response. From Sun's OBP
command reference:
local-mac-address? false
Hi Sean,
I think I just shot myself in the foot.
r...@bs-dsvr28-s:~# zlogin zone1 pkg list -v SUNWipkg
FMRI STATE UFIX
pkg:/sunwi...@0.5.11,5.11-0.111:20090508T161015Z installed
John Ryan wrote:
Hi Sean,
I think I just shot myself in the foot.
r...@bs-dsvr28-s:~# zlogin zone1 pkg list -v SUNWipkg
FMRI STATE UFIX
pkg:/sunwi...@0.5.11,5.11-0.111:20090508T161015Z installed
Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
I can confirm that wine version works for me.
Have you got Spotify running on it?
Installed it, got to the sign in prompt, have no sign in. Went to web
site, not available in my country, USA. Can't answer you, sorry.
Paul
I'm pretty sure this is well documented but my google searches like:
`opensolaris automount nfs'
are turning up so much extraneous bull pucky... I'm not finding it.
I want to make sure a specific nfs share is mounted at bootup.
Server is opensolaris 2006.09 and client is opensolaris
As most of the documentation is in Japanese I don't understand what makes
Midoris any different a Wine distribution than say Crossover or
Bordeaux...do you happen to have any information?
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 2:16 AM, Anon Y Mous system5u...@yahoo.com wrote:
OK, the last new killer
John Weekley wrote:
John Weekley wrote:
Paul wrote:
Please ignore the previous message. Must have been a pebkac issue.
Nope, I'm seeing similar issues. The traceroute still dies at
border2.te7-1-bbnet1.sfo002.pnap.net
And pkg.opensolaris is down yet again. Is this another killer
I see no reason why Oracle can't continue to support both. In reality
Unbreakable is just RHL with a different badge, Oracle comparatively doesnt
spend that much on having it there and if it is bringing in cash there is no
reason to stop supporting it.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 5:13 AM, Alex
John Weekley wrote:
Paul wrote:
Please ignore the previous message. Must have been a pebkac issue.
Nope, I'm seeing similar issues. The traceroute still dies at
border2.te7-1-bbnet1.sfo002.pnap.net
And pkg.opensolaris is down yet again. Is this another killer feature?
Shawn Walker wrote:
John Weekley wrote:
John Weekley wrote:
Paul wrote:
Please ignore the previous message. Must have been a pebkac issue.
Nope, I'm seeing similar issues. The traceroute still dies at
border2.te7-1-bbnet1.sfo002.pnap.net
And pkg.opensolaris is down yet again. Is
John Weekley wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
As announced earlier today, you can setup your own local mirror of
pkg.opensolaris.org if you're running the 2009.06 release:
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=108575tstart=0
Cheers,
Thanks Shawn, how tough would this be to update
This is still an issue after updating to 2009.06, and then all subsequent
updates. Actually, I didn't even realize it was the network that was slow - I
thought my slow zfs sends were because of my old FreeBSD box (had frustrating
ZFS issues there - anyhoo).
I decided to FTP my old database
I care a lot about about OpenSolaris and I want it to be a massive success in
the future and beat RHEL and IBM AIX, but in order for it to eventually become
successful, I think that the following point cannot be emphasized enough:
CUSTOMERS DO NOT WANT TO BE PROHIBITED FROM DEPLOYING NEW IPKG
I don't think that's a parody article. As far as I can tell, the article is
straight,
and it makes sense to me.
@Herzen
Well, if you scroll down and read the comments at the bottom of the article:
http://broadcast.oreilly.com/2009/07/is-oracle-getting-ready-to-kil.html#comments
You'll
I've got a motherboard with an RGE NIC chipset in it. Works great with
OpenSolaris otherwise. Do you think if I shipped the motherboard over one of
Sun's engineering campuses for testing that it might help them to resolve the
bug?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I'm not certain what the right way is to update a zone.
But maybe someone else knows.
I'm not an expert on this, but I believe the non-global zones will update
themselves as long as you detach them before you do the pkg image-update.
Here is a link that shows how to do it using OpenSolaris
hi i have my new fresh installed solaris nevada b117 x86 on my computer
suddenly i must need it to shutdown but the shutdown doesnt working i already
wait for 30mins but still it not working so i turn it off using power button.
please help me how can i fix this problem and is there something
What do you mean by shutdown doesnt working...please elaborate, how did
you initiate the shutdown?
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 3:11 PM, Edgar Trania edgar_tra...@yahoo.comwrote:
hi i have my new fresh installed solaris nevada b117 x86 on my computer
suddenly i must need it to shutdown but the
Try opening up a command line terminal and type in this command:
pfexec init 5
And tell me what happens.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I think, it may be good for data centers. however idea to download all
repository is bad. I don't want to download 7 Gb... Maybe there will be a way
to enable for all packages installed in global zone to appear in local
repository automatically (some kind of cache)?
--
This message posted from
33 matches
Mail list logo
