yes, there are now two 8086,10f0 devices out there.
PCI express
vendor: 8086 (Intel Corporation), device: 10f0 (82578DC Gigabit Network
Connection)
and PCI
Intel(R) PRO/100+ Dual Port Server Adapter 8086:10f0 rev 04
So at first it is intels fault to reuse pci ids.
At second
is the
This may be related to SATA devices being unconfigured and then ZFS attempting
to import the zpool. To resolve this issue I had to disable the SATA drives in
the zpool (which allowd the system to complete the boot), hot plug them after
the system booted, run cfgadm to reset each of the sata
Masayuki Murayama wrote:
Masayuki Murayama wrote:
Let me know if you need anything, testing, info,
such
Thanks
sorry for late response. I was busy in this week.
I need the mac version of your nic, because realtek gigabit nic family has many
variants which are identified
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I am running OpenSolaris in Jaunty (Ubuntu 9.06) now Kamic (Ubuntu 9.10)
under VBox (fully updated, now to 3.0.10). Here's a brief summary of the
problems:
1. no problem with os08011 liveCD and subsequent installation,
2. image-updated to snv_121 thru snv_125,
- Original Message -
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:42:38 -0500
From: John Martin john.m.mar...@sun.com
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] any work on bug ID 6807184
To: Masayuki Murayama khf04...@nifty.ne.jp
Cc: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Masayuki Murayama wrote:
Masayuki Murayama wrote:
well today im back to karmic amd64 cuz well osol for me at personal level is
unusable, for server so far is pretty nice. i think ill try again when 2010 is
stable but osol have very critical issues in my opinion that need to be fixed
to be at least able to handle a non Sun guru users at desktop
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I am running OpenSolaris in Jaunty (Ubuntu 9.06)
now Kamic (Ubuntu 9.10) under VBox (fully updated,
now to 3.0.10). Here's a brief summary of the
problems:
1. no problem with os08011 liveCD and subsequent
installation,
2. image-updated to snv_121 thru
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I am running OpenSolaris in Jaunty (Ubuntu 9.06)
now Kamic (Ubuntu 9.10) under VBox (fully updated,
now to 3.0.10). Here's a brief summary of the
problems:
1. no problem with os08011 liveCD and subsequent
installation,
2. image-updated to
You should have tried OpenSolaris one year ago. :o) The development pace is
very fast, I think you are wise if you look at it again in a while.
But you missed the best part for a developer: DTrace! :o) There are several
Firefox developers that have switched to OpenSolaris just to get DTrace,
true i miss in my post dtrace, but i work with qt and boost, so even if dtrace
is neat sunstudio was the showstopper here. beside dtrace is the reason mainly
i wanna osol in my office. :( but well ill wait a little more until at least
sun studio can handle C++ correctly
--
This message posted
I checked GenUnix, and don't see anything to download.
Any news?
-Kyle
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
We're tracing the problem now. -- Alan
Kyle McDonald wrote:
I checked GenUnix, and don't see anything to download.
Any news?
-Kyle
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I believe that new release of OpenSolaris will be 2010.03 andit will be based
on one of b130+ builds.
Uros
---
Every kind of peaceful cooperation among men
is primarily based on mutual trust and only
secondarily on institutions such as courts of
Uros Nedic wrote:
I believe that new release of OpenSolaris will be 2010.03 and
it will be based on one of b130+ builds.
Kyle was looking for the biweekly dev builds leading up to the 2010
release.
Build 126 is now available on genunix.org. Sorry for the delay.
-- Alan
Uros
Hello all,
I am not sure whether I should post this here or to another project.
Since the upgrade to snv_111b I have an issue with a huwaei 3G usb
card. While trying to connect to the GSM provider (vodafone greece) I get LCP
configuration
timeouts. Tried many options with pppd (sync, noaccomp,
Hi, was wondering if anyone knows if this was fixed in a a later build (126)?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hello,
catopen() function behaves differently on solaris-SPARC and solaris-opteron
platforms.
If NLSPATH is exported pointing to NLSPATH=/home/expert/msg/%N and test.cat
file is in /home/expert/msg/ directory in that case
if we call :
rc = catopen(test, 0)
then on solaris-sparc it returns -1
17 matches
Mail list logo
