i have done some configurations according to
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/current/README.opensolaris
before my compilation of b136's code.
but in order to compile the debug version, i also modify NIGHTLY_OPTION to
-DnaCFlmpr, that is -t is deleted for the purpose of using the tools
Yeah, it should've been released already.
I hope this isn't Oracle's first sign of abandoning the project.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
For future reference:
If solaris is uncleanly shutdown, it is unable to boot again. At least, I
know mine is. I don't know if the same is true of opensolaris.
Yesterday, one of my servers (solaris 10 10/09 10u8) would not shutdown. (I
mistakenly shutdown the NIS server first, and then
It's been mentioned a number of times that 2010.3 was expected near the end of
March, but it was precipitated on getting a stable release out, so it may be
released late.
There were some critical problems with 134, such as not being able to boot if
one disk in a mirrored boot disk dies. I'm
I've installed latest OpenSolaris development snapshot and found that
man, vi and other termcap/curses-based commands don't work with
TERM=rxvt.
Any clue?
P.S.
The same for Solaris-10 I have access to.
--
Best regards, Aleksey Cheusov.
___
There were some critical problems with 134, such as not being able to boot if
one disk in a mirrored boot disk dies.
That's not good... I didn't know that. I have a mirrored boot disk. I guess
I've been living under a false sense of security...
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 03/29/10 08:48 AM, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
There were some critical problems with 134, such as not being able to boot if
one disk in a mirrored boot disk dies.
That's not good... I didn't know that. I have a mirrored boot disk. I guess
I've been living under a false sense of
I haven't tried rxvt under Solaris, but Sakura works fine.
http://www.pleyades.net/david/sakura.php
Building it requires the cmake package.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
I've installed latest OpenSolaris development snapshot and found that
man, vi and other termcap/curses-based commands don't work with
TERM=rxvt.
Any clue?
I haven't tried rxvt under Solaris, but Sakura works fine.
http://www.pleyades.net/david/sakura.php
I'm accessing OpenSolaris from NetBSD
use mrxvt application. So, the problem is not with terminal application
on OpenSolaris, it doesn't run X at all (yet), but with OpenSolaris'
man, vi and other curses/termcap/you_know_better applications. To me it
looks like problem with curses/termcap capabilities. It works fine with
On 03/28/10 04:20 PM, Jürgen Keil wrote:
use mrxvt application. So, the problem is not with terminal application
on OpenSolaris, it doesn't run X at all (yet), but with OpenSolaris'
man, vi and other curses/termcap/you_know_better applications. To me it
looks like problem with curses/termcap
OpenSolaris does not have an rxvt terminfo entry
% ls -l /usr/share/lib/terminfo/r/rxvt
/usr/share/lib/terminfo/r/rxvt: No such file or directory
Seem this is bug 6839489:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6839489
An ncurses rxvt terminfo entry exists in
Jürgen Keil jrgn.k...@googlemail.com wrote:
use mrxvt application. So, the problem is not with terminal application
on OpenSolaris, it doesn't run X at all (yet), but with OpenSolaris'
man, vi and other curses/termcap/you_know_better applications. To me it
looks like problem with
Hi,
I want to pursue the Sun Certified Solaris Associate, but I was wondering, if
i could use opensolaris in place of solaris 10 OS to study for the
certification?
regards
edward
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
I'm glad I dropped OpenSolaris quite some time ago. I almost built my
infrastructure on OpenSolaris but ultimately decided to use OpenBSD and FreeBSD
and am glad I didn't waste any more time on OpenSolaris.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I almost built my infrastructure on OpenSolaris and Solaris but am glad I
decided to opt for FreeBSD and OpenBSD instead.
There are way too many problems with OpenSolaris anymore that it wasn't
reliable. Now throw in the 90 day evaluation and then buy costly support is
icing on the cake.
It
bsd mascotgr...@yahoo.com wrote:
I almost built my infrastructure on OpenSolaris and Solaris but am glad I
decided to opt for FreeBSD and OpenBSD instead.
Solaris 10 is not open and never was. Solaris 10 is from January 2005 and
closed source. OpenSolaris is from Jnue 14th 2005.
Jörg
--
Good for you.
Now, as an exercise, try to install FreeBSD Root on ZFS:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot
I hear it doesn't work.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 15:52 -0700, bsd wrote:
I almost built my infrastructure on OpenSolaris and Solaris but am glad I
decided to opt for FreeBSD and OpenBSD instead.
There are way too many problems with OpenSolaris anymore that it wasn't
reliable. Now throw in the 90 day evaluation and
On Sun, 2010-03-28 at 16:37 -0700, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
Good for you.
Now, as an exercise, try to install FreeBSD Root on ZFS:
http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot
I hear it doesn't work.
Maybe, maybe not. Supposedly works for 8-STABLE, 7.2-STABLE,
9.0-CURRENT, and most
--
Ken Gunderson kgund...@teamcool.net
I will make an effort to have this sort of language and tone blocked and
your email removed permanently.
This is unacceptable.
As someone that recently bought and installed Microsoft Windows Ultimate 7
64-bit edition I would rather look at the cost of
When I took the certification last year it was mainly Solaris related.
Personally, I wouldn't give a certification any credit...One of the questions
was:
On what Solaris 10 installation disk can you find the SUNWvts package?
But as I said, if you do want to pursue it, it's probably only
On what Solaris 10 installation disk can you find the SUNWvts package?
Disk 1 (assuming DVD media).
I do agree, a LOT has changed between S10 and OS, and would only recommend you
run a S10 system if you want to pursue certification...
Just be aware S10 is no longer free, so get ready to offer
I will make an effort to have this sort of language and tone blocked and
your email removed permanently.
This is unacceptable.
speaking as a businessman I certianly [sic] do.
Quite franky [sic], on these public mail lists, you will use correct english
[sic] or
at least acceptable language
In my copious free time, I've been looking at the problem of the terminal
databases. Unfortunately, the real solution is not as easy as it sounds, so I
don't yet have something I can try to get sponsored to correctly fix the
situation. :P However, at
On 03/28/10 10:51 PM, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
I will make an effort to have this sort of language and tone blocked and
your email removed permanently.
This is unacceptable.
speaking as a businessman I certianly [sic] do.
Quite franky [sic], on these public mail
These forums aren't censored for content, just for fowl language, we try to
keep it civil here. I agree with Dennis Clarks warning.
Yes, they are censored for foul language. This is how the post that is
provoking the outrage appears if you view it in the Forums:
let's not dis Open/Solaris
On 03/29/10 01:07 AM, Alex Viskovatoff wrote:
These forums aren't censored for content, just for fowl language, we try to
keep it civil here. I agree with Dennis Clarks warning.
Yes, they are censored for foul language. This is how the post that is
provoking the outrage appears if you
These forums aren't censored for content, just for fowl language, we try
to keep it civil here. I agree with Dennis Clarks warning.
Yes, they are censored for foul language. This is how the post that is
provoking the outrage appears if you view it in the Forums:
I have had quite enough of
29 matches
Mail list logo
