Ken Gunderson wrote: 'Could we please have links to these third party tests?'
Phoronix has a test report to debate between OSOL-DEV-b127 and FreeBSD 8.0:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=freebsd8_benchmarks&num=10
The newer article was January 25, 2010 based on FreeBSD 8.0 and
I thought this info would be helpful during the website merging.
excerpt:
What's happening?
On July 19, we will complete migration of all non-obsolete content from
developers.sun.com, java.sun.com, and BigAdmin to a completely re-architected,
re-designed Oracle Technology Network site. This si
> Hi,
>
> While searching for details of Solaris 10 update 9, I
> found the following on
> http://sparcv9.blogspot.com/2010_06_01_archive.html
>
> Extract
>
> Solaris Next not OpenSolaris?
> Many of us have patiently been awaiting the 2010.xx
> release of OpenSolaris frustrated by the lack of
>
Alan Snelson writes:
> That link works for me - and now I have something to play with this weekend :)
It works for me, too.
But when I try to import the appliance, Virtualbox 3.2.2 says:
Failed to import appliance
The machine is not mutable (state is PoweredOff).
I don't think there's much I can d
On 07/ 2/10 03:43 PM, russell wrote:
Hi,
While searching for details of Solaris 10 update 9, I found the following on
http://sparcv9.blogspot.com/2010_06_01_archive.html
I've been thinking the same thing for a while. It makes a lot of sense,
and all the evidence/pieces fit. If and whe
Hi,
While searching for details of Solaris 10 update 9, I found the following on
http://sparcv9.blogspot.com/2010_06_01_archive.html
Extract
Solaris Next not OpenSolaris?
Many of us have patiently been awaiting the 2010.xx release of OpenSolaris
frustrated by the lack of communication from Or
Thank you. I'll post the question in the forum on virtualbox.org.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
A quick reminder that there's one week left to submit your abstract for
this year's Surge Scalability Conference. The event is taking place on
Sept 30 and Oct 1, 2010 in Baltimore, MD. Surge focuses on case studies
that address production failures and the re-engineering efforts that led
to victor
Ken - Could we please have links to these third party tests? The last I saw
put FBSD-8.0-RELEASE and OSOL each clearly beating the other in certain sub
tests. My conclusion from the analysis put them at overall even for general
all around use. Thank you.
--
This message posted from opensolar
Ah, zpool export -f century, followed by zpool import fixed it.
online/offline is actually for individual disks.
Anyway, I'm going to build another zpool off those WD20EARS 2T advanced
format 4KB block drives. Anyone have any info about what's best for
using them with opensolaris?
___
"From some tests reports provided by third party analysts, OSOL 2009.06 and
OSOL-DEV performed as well or better than FreeBSD and Fedora (Linux)."
Strictly speaking to VirtualBox running on OpenSolaris 2009.06/build 129/ build
134 and FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE: FreeBSD hands-down beats OpenSolaris in
> Based on what Paul said
>
> I don't think 'us' as the community that use Solaris
> or OpenSolaris-based distros
> should feel shafted if Oracle is focused on releasing
> Solaris 11. I'd hope we'd want this
> as the end goal as most of the OpenSolaris-based core
> snapshots were not considere
On 2 Jul 2010, at 18:54, Gary wrote:
> The reason given by some for OpenSolaris is there are bugs. Well, if that is
> truly the case for not releasing OpenSolaris, then what propels them to
> constantly have new versions of VirtualBox instead of having a more stable
> and bug-free product?
Y
On 07/02/2010 01:19 PM, Andre Lue wrote:
> what does the following show:
> echo | format
>
Hi Andre,
Yeah, exactly that. format shows c11, but zpool status shows c9. So it
did move controllers. Not sure why it says cdrom there, but if I pick
drive #2, it warn me that it's part of an active z
Why do they release a newer version of VirtualBox so frequently? Releases
appear faster than the ex-wife could spend money.
The reason given by some for OpenSolaris is there are bugs. Well, if that is
truly the case for not releasing OpenSolaris, then what propels them to
constantly have new
Thanks for digging that up. This is precisely what I was referencing.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Briefly, because I don't want to get into depth about FBSD on an OS forum:
1) ZFS: No, I'm not planning to use ZFS on FBSD. At least not yet. I, too,
have a long history with FBSD, dating back to 2.8 (??) days. I left it circa
6.x because of frustration with file system snafus resulting from
> > Can someone please tell me if
> > http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/ temporarily
> > down or ???
> >
> > Is the contents here mirrored or relocated
> somewhere
> > else?
> >
> > thanks
>
> appears "opensolaris.com" is also down, I can't
> access it. I guess we are being integrated at the
On Jul 2, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Edward Martinez wrote:
Can someone please tell me if
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/ temporarily
down or ???
Is the contents here mirrored or relocated somewhere
else?
thanks
appears "opensolaris.com" is also down, I can't access it. I guess
we are being
> Can someone please tell me if
> http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/ temporarily
> down or ???
>
> Is the contents here mirrored or relocated somewhere
> else?
>
> thanks
appears "opensolaris.com" is also down, I can't access it. I guess we are
being integrated at the moment
--
This messag
what does the following show:
echo | format
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Can someone please tell me if http://dlc.sun.com/osol/on/downloads/ temporarily
down or ???
Is the contents here mirrored or relocated somewhere else?
thanks
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-
On Jul 1, 2010, at 6:19 AM, Florian Manschwetus wrote:
> http://osdldbt.sourceforge.net/
> I'd like to do some tpc-c like test with mysql in a opensolaris zone,
> for some research.
>
> But it looks to me, that building against ips mysql, would ne sun studio
> compiler, but with sun studio compi
Sorry to shock everyone by asking an actual technical question instead
of whinging about the next release, but... :)
1) I have a 4 drive USB array made up of 1T drives hooked up to osol_134
which no longer shows up after I removed an unused USB PCI card (the
array was connected to the motherboard
On 02.07.10 15:28, Matthias Pfützner wrote:
And then hopefully on monday place an order for a S7000 system... ;-)
All the docs for the S7000 are under:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/FishWorks/Fishworks
http://blogs.sun.com/fishworks/
Actually it should be available in the Simulator its
On 07/ 2/10 05:05 AM, Norm Jacobs wrote:
Assuming that you are running current bits and CUPS is your active
print service, It should work. It looks like your printer is
supported by the version of gutenprint that is in OpenSolaris. You
should be able to use the print manager to create a que
Based on what Paul said
I don't think 'us' as the community that use Solaris or OpenSolaris-based
distros
should feel shafted if Oracle is focused on releasing Solaris 11. I'd hope we'd
want this
as the end goal as most of the OpenSolaris-based core snapshots were not
considered 'production
Link working today for me Thanks
I guess the absence of the vmware image means it's no longer offered, only
virtualbox image?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
As I said: It's my idea, but no-one currently listening, as fas as I
know... ;-(
So, no such iPod-moment forseeable, sadly... ;-(
But, I at least did set up stuff like that, like others have done:
http://blogs.pfuetzner.de/matthias/?p=525
I even updated it again, with a different MoBo, the
I'll take your word on the not worrying front ;-)
Bit overcast today but a nice break from the constant heat (yes I'm British)!
As for the Atom HOME-NAS - now there's something I might consider ordering on
Monday :)
Will that come in Oracle red?
Alan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.or
Robert Milkowski wrote:
> While I can understand it when it applies to commercial only products it
> doesn't make much sense
> when applied to open source products being in development.
This is a new aspect of the long standing tension with the dual nature
of the distro named OpenSolaris, since it
You (Alan Snelson) wrote:
> Thanks Matthias!
>
> I never say never but until all the FUD surrounding OpenSolaris evaporates
> I'll be keeping my options Open :)
>
> Enjoy the weekend,
> Alan
Don't worry to much... Enjoy summer... ;-)
And: FishWorks is based 100% on OpenSolaris, with some addit
Thanks Matthias!
I never say never but until all the FUD surrounding OpenSolaris evaporates I'll
be keeping my options Open :)
Enjoy the weekend,
Alan
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
And then hopefully on monday place an order for a S7000 system... ;-)
All the docs for the S7000 are under:
http://wikis.sun.com/display/FishWorks/Fishworks
http://blogs.sun.com/fishworks/
Enjoy!
Matthias
You (Alan Snelson) wrote:
> That link works for me - and now I have something
> From: opensolaris-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:opensolaris-
> discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of Alan Coopersmith
>
> Ken Gunderson wrote:
> > Yeah, but you got to admit that this one surely set a new slippage
> > record.
>
> Not even close:
>
> [some examples]
I might
That link works for me - and now I have something to play with this weekend :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You (Robert Milkowski) wrote:
> I understand that but all I'm saying is that it is simply wrong when
> applied to something like Open Solaris development. There are certainly
> technical people here involved with OSOL 2010.06 and with /dev builds.
> Before Oracle I'm sure they would explain what
> I don't recall seeing any Oracle promises. I
> believe they were all
> assumptions based on information available. The
> last promise I
> remember seeing is 2010.03 from Sun, not
> Oracle. I'm getting really
> disappointed in not seeing anything. I would
> like to see the
> development branch ope
On 07/ 2/10 09:07 PM, Robert Milkowski wrote:
I understand that but all I'm saying is that it is simply wrong when
applied to something like Open Solaris development. There are
certainly technical people here involved with OSOL 2010.06 and with
/dev builds. Before Oracle I'm sure they would e
I understand that but all I'm saying is that it is simply wrong when
applied to something like Open Solaris development. There are certainly
technical people here involved with OSOL 2010.06 and with /dev builds.
Before Oracle I'm sure they would explain what the issue is, etc.
Right now they c
Robert,
the reason we're silent is at least twofold, I guess...
1.) We simply don't know
2.) There had been way to much discussion with negative, even offending words
Eric and Alan did at least try to describe, why we have to be silent.
Procedures at Oracle currently do not differentiate betwe
On 01/07/2010 22:03, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
Ken Gunderson wrote:
Thank you sincerely for clarifying that effectively everyone outside of Oracle
with an interest in this somehow came to same deluded conclusion that there was
going to be a 2010.H1 release.
I didn't say that - clearly
I'd call that a "negative interpretation"... On a comparable product: Did you
ever see any roadmap, release dates whatever for Oracle Enterprise Linux? Or even for
Java? Oracle Solaris Cluster? Siebel? Bea?
Matthias
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Svein Skogen
An: opensolaris-discus
On 01.07.2010 23:21, Erik Trimble wrote:
> On 7/1/2010 2:08 PM, Hillel Lubman wrote:
>>> Oracle Policy
>>>
>> That's self obvious. I was asking what is that policy exactly.
>>
>
> Generally: No comment on anything in the future.
>
> To paraphrase Larry:"Why would I want to
44 matches
Mail list logo
