On Thu, 7 Aug 2008, Dennis Clarke wrote:
Mr. Philip Brown :
sniparoo
Dennis,
This list is not a forum to express your personal views and/or differences
between you and Phil.
What is between you and others, is quite honestly between you and others.
Now, with that said, what's up with
andrew wrote:
Yes - the type 6 has a beep. I got a brand new one with my old Ultra 10 I
bought off eBay. ;-)
I'd double check that.
Type 6 is USB. An Ultra 10, was Sun's proprietary serial keyboard.
Type 6 comes in both USB and Sun's proprietary type.
Type 5c and Type 6 look almost
Have you tried smbios?
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
In terms of shape and weight, it looks more like the good old
type 5 than the type 6 did.
I have a type 7, 6 and 5 here and what I would say is that I like the 7
best. It's (only) slightly heaver than the type 6 (much lighter than the
type 5). The type 5c was about as lightweight as the
Dennis,
I think that getting uptime to report 5000 days should be no problem. I
wonder what happens if I set the time to a date previous to the epoch? That
would sort of force a negative number as the UNIX time.
snv_77 will not let you set the time to before 01:00 on the date of the
Can anyone tell me why, rpcbind not only binds to udp/111, but also
to some other random udp port above 32770. I can find lots of information
about this be a vulnera
bility and this and that, but I really cannot find any information as to the
functional reason for
this.
This port is used
I have a query about scheduling in multi core systems. The user level
threads are mapped to LWP in Solaris and those LWPs are scheduled by the
OS.
Is there any flexibility for the user to write some module and plug into
the kernel so that he can schedule all the LWPs (to which his threads
are
With Virtual Box on the scene, the OpenSolaris virtual solutions provide
more and better ways to connect OpenSolaris to other environments.
I feel as though I'm reading a Sun Microsystems press release here.
I think you are missing the important part that Virtual Box allows
Hi! I just installed Open Solaris on my new computer where I also have Debian
Linux installed.
My problem is now that under Open Solaris no network device is available while
under Linux there i
s the on board ethernet device eth1. Under solaris I there was the following
output from the comman
On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 8:43 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A related question is what is the limit for the max UIDs?
2147483647
I believe this was doubled recently as a part of
6549515 PSARC 2007/064: uid_t and gid_t to become unsigned
which was integrated last May.
No,
Hello all,
My strong suggestion:
Please go away from SXCE and SXDE and put in Builds
Indiana (OS Developer Preview) in place of these
two!!!
It must release in Builds
People which want to use Development tools let them
use Solaris 10 Update 4.
Some other things.
Nimbus,
On Feb 18, 2008 5:24 AM, Richard Zhao [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For linux kernel 2.6, modules are version depended. one to one.
What about solaris?
Solaris has outstanding backward compatibility. If you adhere to
published API when developing your kernel module, you will
be able to run your
usr/src/lib/libbc
Why there is no i386 folder under libbc?
There never was a commercially viable SunOS 4.x for x86 so we never
created an x86 SunOS 4.x backward compatible mode as there was no need.
I want to build files under libc,but there is no i386 folder under libbc
Why? What is the
On a server in a computer room or out in a telco CO, do you need
sound ?
I would think not
For the customers on the list for BlueWonder, it's not important.
What are you guys looking for in a system:
1. Small is pricey
2. Multiple 10/100/1000 ethernet
Absolutely.
3. Fanless we
Cheers - I just wanted to check that Bourne-style = non-POSIX (rather
than Korn-style = POSIX)
That is actually unclear to me; certainly I would like to have chapter and
verse quoted of the relevant POSIX standard.
I certainly believe that this should work:
read value from-file
but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cheers - I just wanted to check that Bourne-style = non-POSIX (rather
than Korn-style = POSIX)
That is actually unclear to me; certainly I would like to have chapter and
verse quoted of the relevant POSIX standard.
I certainly believe that this should work:
You cannot look at too few claims from POSIX.
the definitions for read say that read affects the shell execution environment
unless it is run on a sub shell.
As in cat from-file | read value the read command is not run in a sub shell
environment, it needs to affect the environment.
You
As the terrm multi-command pipeline is not defined, it is questionable what
this text should mean
It's a pipeline with more than one command as directly follows from the
pipeline definition.
A pipeline is a sequence of one or more commands separated by
the control operator
Hi,
I am facing problem after installing patches required to enable extended FILE
facility on Solaris
10 OS. After setting the environment variable
LD_PRELOAD_32=/usr/lib/extendedFILE.so.1,
I am not able to run any 32-bit application including a simple ls command.
The error I am getting is as
furthermore:
# /bin/sh -c 'foo=a; echo b | read foo; echo $foo'
a
# /bin/ksh -c 'foo=a; echo b | read foo; echo $foo'
a
( FAO Mr Carlson :) )
It's ksh but not as we know it, Jim.
/bin/ksh93 -c 'foo=a; echo b | read foo; echo $foo'
(I.e., it's the same shell but it doesn't behave like ksh
cpio has a bug with hard link handling that will cause real problems
if you use the outdated mkisofs that currently comes with Solaris.
What kind of bug (it always works for me and makes the proper hardlinks)
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
Hi all,
As a non-Sun expert, I am considering buying an E10K as a file server for a
business.
It would come with a StorEdge with 12 x 73GB drives.
Are you sure that you mean an E10K?
I'd say: don't do it: it's expensive to run, it's old and therefor not
fast; it consumes a fortune in
A simple truss command reveals that xscreensaver opens your DISPLAY with
an euid of 0:
15560: execve(/usr/openwin/bin/xscreensaver, 0xFFBFEF3C, 0xFFBFEF44) argc =
1
15560: *** SUID: ruid/euid/suid = 21782 / 0 / 0 ***
15560: access(/home/casper/.Xauthority, R_OK)= 0
15560:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ultimately, /sbin/sh is an unacceptable shell in a modern environme=
nt
for a variety of reasons.
It isn't even POSIX compliant, and the base system shell should be.
POSIX does not deal with path names and thus does not require that
/bin/sh is POSIX
POSIX does not deal with path names and thus does not require that
/bin/sh is POSIX compliant.
What do path names have to do with the shell command language?
I think Joerg means the base system shell need not be /bin/sh.
(I.e., the pathname to the base system shell is not defined and neither
1) *NOT* POSIX compliant
2) Buggy
3) Provides a poor user experience
4) Lacks proper internationalization support
5) Reflects poorly on Solaris
6) Hasn't been actively maintained
7) Continues to cause issues for users and developers when dealing
with multiple systems
1-6 are easily solved
Since it seems that one group cares more about what they end up with
when they login as, or su to root, and the other group seems to care
more about scripts that use #!/bin/sh running correctly, then maybe,
just maybe (dare I say it?) the solution is to just make the default
passwd entry for
I think you mean 'non-homogeneous'. ;) Otherwise you'd have no problems
because you'd have no different platforms.
If linux is one of your platforms though, then you still have problems,
since /bin/sh is bash on there, and not ksh93, and you'll still have
feature, and behaviour differences
FYI Ubuntu uses dash as /bin/sh and Suse will use dash in the future.
ksh93 has been discussed but it needs to be licensed as LGPL or GPL
before Suse can use ksh93 as /bin/sh.
Dash? That's a new one (and a brand of detergent for washing machines)
Why not gosh? (Which would be the name of
/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne S=
hell.
And it cannoit really be made compatible without breaking ksh.
(And while we can fix our scripts to work fine with ksh/ksh93,
customer scripts breakage will be different)
Casper
On Feb 5, 2008 4:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/bin/sh is something different, it is not a Korn Shell but a Bourne S=
hell.
And it cannoit really be made compatible without breaking ksh.
(And while we can fix our scripts to work fine with ksh/ksh93,
customer scripts breakage will be
Admitedly, that is not your average PC, and while its fast its
price-performance
isn't leading, there are no Solaris systems on the list that beat it in
absolute
performance. Nor, indeed, any SPARC ones. Hopefully Rock will help
out, eventually.
Sun has not submitted a TPC-C benchmark
Can I just be clear on this - you don't want simplified, unified and
tested software installation; you don't want easier access to the core
OS software; and you don't want help from an extended community of
peers?
I think he may want that, bu the claims he is NOT getting that from
Linux;
Totally agree - this is exactly what happened recently on a Linux server
I know of. But to say that the implementation is poor is to ignore the
prime motivation for such a system - many admins are too busy to compile
all their software from source, follow dependencies and finesse
implementation
# cp /usr/bin/i86/ksh93 /sbin/sh
will fix your problem.
And also damage the system's consistency.
And it will cause all running copies of sh to crash.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
And some people praised it and supported the experimental changes made
there.
FIt still pretty much sounds like Sun's age old mistake of fsck our old
customers, lets get some new ones.
So much of this reminds me of all the BSD-SVR4 religion of 20 years ago.
SunOS changed then to build
And some people praised it and supported the experimental changes made
there.
Note that experimtal changes are extremely important and that I think
we're not doing enough of the experimenting bits (and this is pretty
hard to do for a wide audience because experiments are bound to fail
in some
Which is why change for change sake is wrong and thorough analysis is
needed to determine what changes are really needed.
How can you do a thorough analysis of a change that has so many
(unknown) consequences? I don't think it's possible.
I think it is clear that it is technically
Agreed, especially since both ps's are really the same program:
% ls -ilF /usr/bin/ps /usr/ucb/ps
198275 -r-xr-xr-x 71 root bin 8164 Jan 27 02:11 /usr/bin/ps*
198275 -r-xr-xr-x 71 root bin 8164 Jan 27 02:11 /usr/ucb/ps*
No, not really. (Both are called through
My configuration is: Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 + MSI P965 Platinum (Spee=
dStep support enabled),
the latter is on the latest bios firmware, running OpenSolaris b75
I'm getting cpu_acpi: _PSS package not found, so SpeedStep is not b=
eing enabled by OpenSolaris.
According to MSI, this motherboard
Wouldn't it be easier to just read the input using fgets(), fread(), etc.
until you get the entire
string, then use sscanf() on the string you read?
Of course, there are a lot of issues with reading input like this. First and
foremost, how do you
know when it's done? If you use a
Hi,
I need to read more than 256 characteres from input (stdin) and pass it
to scanf() in a program, but on Solaris10 the limit that I reached is
256. On linux and AIX it works correctly.
It's an implementation defined limit.
I tried to redefine the settings below on limits.h:
MAX_CANON 256
Wohaa! What is this??? Do you guys claim that Solaris x86 32bit recognizes and
can use more memory
than 4GB (depending on the BIOS)? But... I have been told that no 32bit OS
can use more than 4
GB (windows XP users have told me that)!
Solaris will automatically enable PAE if you have
So the short answer here is that I don't know what the Sun implementation of
SSH is really but it seems to be NOT what we see at the source site. So that
really is the only reason why I tend to run the packages built on reference
servers that I trust and with source code drawn directly from the
$ ssh -V
OpenSSH_4.3, OpenSSL 0.9.7g 11 Apr 2005
$ uname -rs
OpenBSD 3.9
and aes256 is still supported. So Sun has apparently w/held some of the
strong crypto stuff. I'll leave the rest up to the conspiracy
theorists...
That has something to do with export control and the way the openssl
It is not impossible at all. Merely improbable. Even with current
techniques. So improbable because ( 2^128 - 1 ) =
340282366920938463463374607431768211455 is a staggeringly large number. Even
Mathematica takes a pause to factor a number that has prime factors in that
scale. But it can be done.
Exactly. Just like breaking the sound barrier or landing on the moon right?
If we use current numerical methods and theories then we can not brute force
factor a number that large. It just can't be done. Period. At all. Ever.
No, neither of the first two were ever theoretically impossible, even
Right, but I'm not sure it was possible then, though such systems were
clearly build later on.
Now it is possible at home with a 400MHz pentium_pro.
If you wait a long time (but the point is quickly and a 400Mhz Pentium Pro
doesn't quite fit that bill).
It seems that the NSA has given up
Hello all,
Is there any memory usage limits in latest Solaris Express Community, Indiana
using Pentium 4 (Pre
scott) 32bit processor with 4Gb DDR2 533MHz memory.
Windows XP Pro 32bit don't recognize all 4Gb memory.
There is no limit but the BIOS may not enable all 4GB of memory because
What you're basically saying is, if you can't fathom how somebody could use
the information from that document to brute force an MD5 hash, it doesn't
have anything to do with it.
No, that's not at all what I am saying, and you don't seem to understand a
few of the basic concepts here.
E.g.,
So basically this more of a weak password problem, wh/there are other
methods for dealing with, e.g.:
No, it is not even a weak password problem: the MD5 hashes in the password
file are NOT hashes of the password but rather hashes of password + salt
and then rehashed a 1000 odd times.
So
This is an example. If the attacker found and exploited a zero day
vulnerability
in SSH, he would be root, and would need no password for `su -`. I thought that
much was clear.
If, indeed, he exploited a bit of ssh which runs as root as a (large)
part of it does not.
(There are two daemons
I have to dissapoint you again: MD5 has been broken and can no longer be
considered safe:
But that is nearly completely irrelevant for MD5 password hashing.
And even though DES is broken, there are no breaks for original UNIX
crypt which are faster than brute force (though pre-computing all
With MD5 key hashes the keyspace is (much) longer and
brute force is still
the only option, yet the algorithm takes longer to
run and the size of the
keyspace makes finding non-trivial passwords much
harder.
According to the paper, it can take as fast as 67 seconds.
I wouldn't dismiss it
On the topic,
Does anyone know if the new Phenom (Quad core AMD brand) chips will
have the same power stepping issues as the X2 AMD chips do? Are any of
the newer AMD X2 chip revisions going to fix this issue?
The 0x10 chips (aka Quad Core/Phenom) will have a CPU frequency
independent
...or am I just too tired to see the obvious?
It stops at 2GB.
# cd /b78
# cat sol-nv-b78-x86-dvd-iso-a sol-nv-b78-x86-dvd-iso-b
sol-nv-b78-x86-dvd-iso-c sol-nv-b78-x86-
dvd.iso
cat: write error: File too large
cat: write error: File too large
#
What shell are you using?
What filesystem
even the permissions on the real devices look ok:
crw--- 1 root sys 42, 2 Dec 31 19:07 /devices/pseudo/[EMAIL PROTECTED]:tcp
crw--- 1 root sys 105, 2 Dec 31 19:07 /devices/pseudo/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:ticlts
crw--- 1 root sys 105, 0 Dec 31 19:08 /devices/pseudo/[EMAIL
PROTECTED]:ticots
Hi
I have tried LD_PRELOAD and UMEM_DEBUG with my program on Sparc.
Everything worked. I also am unable to find any bug in my program.
No clue as to who is the culprit..
You will need to go over your code and check it carefully.
Something is copying a few extra bytes into a structure.
(Note
Hi
Apart from the scenario I explained below, I also get a SIGABRT with the
following stack trace
libc.so.1`_lwp_kill+0x15(1, 6)
libc.so.1`raise+0x1f(6)
libumem.so.1`umem_do_abort+0x25(9, fefb5000, 804691c, fef98b1c,
fefa3ae8, 80aa810)
libumem.so.1`umem_err_recoverable+0x46(fefa3ae8)
I thought that the bug might be in my program. But everything works fine
with 64 bit binaryare there any flags that need to be set/unset
while compling?
It is fairly certain that the bug is in your program.
Memory corruption bugs are hard to trace and are not always easy to
reproduce. A
This is the o/p I get with umem_status when I attach mdb to the process
running.
Status: ready and active
Concurrency:0
Logs: (inactive)
Message buffer:
umem allocator: redzone violation: write past end of buffer
buffer=80c7c68 bufctl=80c8ce8 cache: umem_alloc_80
This
Hi All
When I use my 32 bit binary on Solaris x86 machine, I get a segmentation
fault with the following stack trace.
libc.so.1`_malloc_unlocked+0x14c(4000, 3, 80a3130, 1, 8046a38, 805763f)
libc.so.1`malloc+0x39(4000, 0, 8046a1c, fef9e455, fef9158c, 4)
meta_del+0x13(2, 80a3100, 10, 0)
It could be the chipset. Some chipsets only support up to 3 G of RAM even
under 64 bit OS. I fou
nd this when I installed 4 G of RAM and could not figure out why I was only
getting 3 G of RAM.
True; and some require a BIOS setting to make all RAM under 4GB available.
(Adding more RAM will
I was not referring to sponsors -- the work of making star compatible
with tar(1) when executed as tar is yours to do, and much of the other
work is yours too, but if you do this as someone outside SWAN then
you'll be getting a sponsor to help with certain tasks (and either way
you'll need
Hi,
I recently installed 4 GB RAM but only see 3 GB. Maybe this is an
issue of have been loading the 32 bit kernel. I am encountering a
strange problem when I type this command:
Might be a BIOS issue, not a Solaris issue.
Even a 32 bit kernel can deal with 4GB or more just fine.
uname -a
Joep Vesseur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
He did start this thread and if you like to filter someone, you would need
to filter Casper...
I have not kept record of all the times we have discussed this subject, so I
honestly can't say who started it and who didn't, but in favor of us all
On Dec 15, 2007 1:56 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any existing tools or interface on the solaris can monitor=
CPU
temperature and control fan status?
I'm using the following dtrace script to monitor cpu temperatures on =
a
Tecra S1 centrino laptop (monitors some dtrace
That might not be true. On my a mobile platform machine,
fan worked in BIOS but stopped after enter solaris and never worked,
even if the CPU temperature was getting more and more hot.
Eventually the console print
press any key to reboot
I'm using snv_77.
The Thermal zone driver should take
It seems that PSARC discussions are not taken for serious
Why would you conclude that?
It's very simple, Joerg, first to integrate wins.
If you want to rename compare you will need to take this up with
the ImageMagick folks.
I thinkt hat integrating open source projects as is is vastly
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that PSARC discussions are not taken for serious
Why would you conclude that?
It's very simple, Joerg, first to integrate wins.
WRONG: in the OSS world the first user os a name wins and the imagemagick name
is thus illegal.
Says who? And who keeps
Do you like to ignore that my compare is genric and thus correctly using
the name and that it is 20 years older than imagemagick?
I think it is hardly relevant.
I do not remember hearing of it before and without any evidence of more
than marginal usage (say part of one or more mainstream
Collaboration happens in the community.
If you are a member of the OpenSolaris community, you should try
to collaborate.
This is a case to see whether there is collaboration or domination!
No. You seem to operate under the misapprehension that collaboration
implies that you get your way.
Can someone explain the difference between these two?
samba == samba
smb/server == in-kernel CIFS server.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
You forget the most important result from the ARC discussion:
If there is a name collision the cannot be resolved, the name cannot be used
in /usr/bin.
Current Solaris express is in conflict with ARC decisions.
PSARC discussions happen ONLY in the context of the product/release under
for
For this reason, the compare from imagemagick either needs to be renamed
or it needs to be put into a different directory.
Your compare command gives a name clash with ImageMagick's compare command;
why don't you rename yours?
Since there is already a plain file compare program cmp which is
Is there any existing tools or interface on the solaris can monitor=
CPU
temperature and control fan status?
I'm using the following dtrace script to monitor cpu temperatures on =
a
Tecra S1 centrino laptop (monitors some dtrace probes in the=20
tzmon kernel module). Unfortunatelly it's not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For this reason, the compare from imagemagick either needs to be=
renamed
or it needs to be put into a different directory.
Your compare command gives a name clash with ImageMagick's compare =
command;
why don't you rename yours?
Looks like you are unwilling to
Stop replying unless you are willing to have a discussion instead of
proclaiming things.
Pot. Kettle. Black.
You are the one proclaiming and accusing. I think I am being
reasonable.
I've tried to ask the question more politely several times, but I have
yet to see an answer, so I'll be a
As long as it it impossible to implement the arc decisions in OpenSolaris,
OpenSolaris cannot evolve.
ARC does not decide as much as approves, approves w/ TCRs or denies.
But projects approved by the ARC are often implemented so to claim
that that is impossible is ludicrous.
But they are
My experience has been that ARC is very agreeable to work with people to
figure out new ways of doing things when needed. It took us several
failed attempts, but working together we found a way to document
interface change in the GNOME desktop that is suitable to ARC and
which also isn't so
#!/usr/bin/bash
mkdir $2
lofiadm -a $1 /dev/lofi/1
mount -F hsfs -o ro /dev/lofi/1 $2 echo -e \n\t I have mounted $1 under
the folder $2\n\n
You should realize that lofiadm actually outputs the device used, so
the script can be written so as not to require only /dev/lofi/1
I've attached my
Stefan Gaertner wrote:
me too. Need WPA2 AES for wpi, included build 78.
And I'm waiting to see what CIFS support is like in b78 before I install
Samba!
Samba is still installed in b78 also.
Casper
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
BTW, if you are looking to extract slices of a boot CD ISO,
someone wrote a script for that (SPARC, anyway) some time back,
and I had written a C program (and IIRC posted it to Usenet - try
groups.google.com) to do the job too. Once thus extracted, one
could use lofiadm on the resulting
What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP
to the dtlogin. That
doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a fix, it's a
workarround imho.
This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions.
Anyone know what changed here?
Security,
What i would like to do is keep using the cde-login and get access with XDMCP
to the dtlogin. Tha
t
doesn't seem to work in b76 x86. Changing to gdm is not a fix, it's a
workarround imho.
This worked out-of-the-box on previous solaris versions.
Anyone know what changed here?
Security,
ifconfig -a plumb is an intentional, though undocumented, special
case. Ordinarily, the -a option means read SIOCGIFCONF to
determine what interfaces IP knows about, and operate on them.
The code to find all interfaces is as simple as:
#include libdevinfo.h
#include stdio.h
static int
I think the ability to set a min and a max frequency in /etc/power.conf would
be useful. I might f
or example want to let mine go up to 1.667 GHz rather than teh normal 2.000
GHz, but let it go down
to 1.000 GHz. In other words, have some degree of manual control, while
letting the system
I too find /root an extremely poor choice; which part of root do
these people not understand?
Of course, if you then say but all the window and browser garbage in /?
I can only say that I think that /.mozilla should be linked to /dev/*mem
in order to ensure maximum damage when you start a
One more thing. I think it would be useful if there was a forum specifically
addressing laptop use
rs. I run Solaris 10 update 4 on my Blade 2000 and Solaris Express Developer
Edition 9/07 snv_70b
X86 on my laptop. I have a completely different set of issues on the laptop,
which are very
Are you talking about the changeset from 8 hours ago titled Restoring Sun
approved governance :
https://opends.dev.java.net/source/browse/opends/trunk/www/public/docs/dev-docs/OpenDS-Governance.
html?rev=3475r1=3475r2=3474 ?
I'm not sure where you get 8 hours ago? I count nearly 9 days.
I expect Sun employees to forward the blog URI directly to Jonathan Schwartz.
I also expect Sun employees to back up their now former colleague and show
that they have spine, and complain to Jonathan about this incident.
If the incident is indeed as it transpired but it seems that the story
is
Process 10 has it's stderr open on the console in O_WRONLY mode.
And a svcprop svc:/system/install-discovery:default
(or svcprop install-discovery) reveals this start/exec property:
/sbin/install-discovery /dev/console /dev/console 21
Looks like that needs to be fixed:
Shawn,
Thank you for bringing that to our attention.
On Nov 29, 2007 9:01 PM, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://directorymanager.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/an-open-letter-to-the-opends-community-and-to-s
un-microsystems/
Shawn,
Thank you for bringing that to our attention.
I
On Nov 30, 2007, at 1:51 AM, Ian Collins wrote:
What do 4 out of the above 5 questions have to do with OpenSolaris?
Everything.
If Sun can gut OpenDS like that and put the project's own governance
under duress, whose to say the same won't happen to prominent
OpenSolaris.org projects?
Is this the way it's supposed to work? Is this due to things that are
missing from the miniroot?
No, more is just broken.
I think it expects to be able to read from stderr (for obvious reasons :-)
and exits when it cannot.
Casper
___
Just curious, can it normally read from stderr?
Yes:
truss -t read more /etc/passwd /etc/passwd
.
read(2, q, 1)= 1
If so what's different about the miniroot that keeps it from reading
from stderr?
Non-readable stderr, apparently.
Casper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this the way it's supposed to work? Is this due to things that are
missing from the miniroot?
No, more is just broken.
I think it expects to be able to read from stderr (for obvious reasons :-)
and exits when it cannot.
If stderr is a tty and you cannot
J=FCrgen Keil writes:
In snv_75a, the miniroot /sbin/sulogin shell script contains this l=
ine:
=20
exec 0 /dev/console 10 20
=20
The miniroot /sbin/sulogin from snv_75a has SCCS ID=20
@(#)sulogin.sh 1.5. Has that changed for snv_77?
It's still the same in the gate.
But how are the
Also useful would be a message when the speed is reduced. I get messages like:
cpudrv: [ID 495817 kern.info] NOTICE: cpudrv_pm_set_topspeed: instance 1: has
new max power of 200
0 MHz
but dont see any if the speed is reduce - I've no idea if it does reduce.
If you get many of those
The messages you've listed are printed to the system log whenever the
maximum power level changes. These maximums are set outside the scope
Solaris by ACPI (and Solaris just complies with the request). All
setting a new maximum means is that your processor cannot run at a
frequency any higher
201 - 300 of 1175 matches
Mail list logo
