Re: [osol-discuss] /export/home vs. /home

2007-10-10 Thread Darren Kenny
Hi Claus, you have the nobrowse option to /home - which means ls /home will give nothing (i.e. you can't browse it) - you probably need to try /home/claus or /home/kilaasi to see anything in /home. HTH, Darren. Claus Guttesen wrote: Did you restart the automounter ? svcadm restart autofs

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: Project Proposal: JDS Single System Administration

2006-07-12 Thread Darren Kenny
Liane, I would quote the text : -- Because of this, we decided that SMF was a good foundation to build upon. Doing so meant we could automatically handle any service currently in SMF, and without modification handle new services delivered in future

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal: JDS Single System Administration

2006-07-12 Thread Darren Kenny
Hi Michael, How does this beat on NWAM? There is no reason that whatever is done here - and you've look at the tool I'm proposing for network admin (from GNOME System Tools) - it's very simple. It can work with any underlying architecture and the backend is in perl so there is absolutely no

[osol-discuss] Project Proposal: JDS Single System Administration

2006-06-23 Thread Darren Kenny
JDS Single System Administration (JDS SSA) is a group of projects to bring some basic system administration tools to (Open)Solaris. While Solaris has enterprise based administration tools, mostly web-based and the Sun Management Console (SMC) and finally various CLI based utilities - these

Re: [osol-discuss] Project Proposal: JDS Single System Administration

2006-06-23 Thread Darren Kenny
, 2006-06-23 at 16:07, Darren Kenny wrote: JDS Single System Administration (JDS SSA) is a group of projects to bring some basic system administration tools to (Open)Solaris. How does this relate to the Visual Panels project? ___ opensolaris-discuss

Re: [osol-discuss] Can we start OpenSolaris PMS enhancement project ?

2005-08-05 Thread Darren Kenny
To the OpenSolaris.org webmasters, Is there no Wiki on the opensolaris.org site that we could use for this - my only issue with something so core being discussed off-site is that it's likely to get lost... Doing a quick search on opensolaris.org I see reference to the page:

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Can we start OpenSolaris PMS enhancement project ?

2005-08-05 Thread Darren Kenny
I'd totally vote for moinmoin - my favourite Wiki, but I'm sure everyone has their own... Darren. TJ Yang wrote: To the OpenSolaris.org webmasters, Is there no Wiki on the opensolaris.org site that we could use for this - my only issue with something so core being discussed off-site is

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Why I do think OpenSolaris ought to work with Debian

2005-07-21 Thread Darren Kenny
UNIX admin wrote: Yesterday I spent a few hours at night thinking and talking with friends about OpenSolaris and more specifically trying to answer the question of Why I don't use OpenSolaris on my personal laptop?. I don't know. Why don't you? I know I can't wait for my laptop to come

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Future of the desktop

2005-07-19 Thread Darren Kenny
Joerg, I'm not sure what you mean by Solaris / CDE in this context? To reiterate what we are planning and to try clarify things (I hope) : JDS, as a desktop platform, is essentially GNOME, in that we take GNOME packages and apply patches (which include bug fixes, some features and branding)

Re: [osol-discuss] freedesktop.org architecture/requirements

2005-07-15 Thread Darren Kenny
Hi Shawn, Shawn Walker wrote: On 7/14/05, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Last time i built DBUS (about 9 months ago or so), it sort of worked, emphasis on sort of. AFACS, HAL is in a pretty incipient stage, and, to my knowledge, there's been very little (if any) Solaris work done.

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Code Management System for OpenSolaris

2005-07-07 Thread Darren Kenny
The JDS team never used TW since it simply didn't make sense when, at the time, all of GNOME is using CVS, it just made sense for us to use the same internally since some sources would be internal, and others external, which would allow us to simply use one code management system. Even in the