On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 6:51 AM, Alan DuBoff al...@softorchestra.com wrote:
The comment about GNU is IMO unjustified. The ksh93-integration and
ATT team have done a much better technical job than GNU in the last
four years. We got ksh93, a lot of modernized tools, even more in the
work, with
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Alan DuBoff al...@softorchestra.com wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2010, Erik Trimble wrote:
Be *very* careful what you wish for. One of the problems with OpenSolaris
(from a PR standpoint) has been the lack of real emphasis on the GOAL for
OpenSolaris. Is it a
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Nicholas George
nicholas.george.homeoff...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hello list,
we wish to have the bug below handled ASAP and are looking for at
least a year of full support for our existing Sun hardware running
Opensolaris.
Which support options does Oracle
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@oracle.com wrote:
You'll have to talk to a Oracle Sales Rep directly to get information
about Support options for OpenSolaris. This has been changing over the
past month(s), so please talk to the SaleReps - the various
On 7/7/09, Henk Langeveld h...@hlangeveld.nl wrote:
Roland Mainz wrote:
[1]=Actually... what is the current stock ticker symbol of ATT right now
?
That'd be a bit confusing. Even though ATT was acquired some years back,
it was a kind of reverse takeover.
Anyhow, ATT's stock ticker
On 3/25/09, Dennis Clarke dcla...@blastwave.org wrote:
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
This isnt very constructive either, it is also not true,
Noises deleted
If Jörg continues this path I'd propose to throw Mr. Jörg out of
opensolaris.
I agree
On 3/25/09, Joerg Schilling joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Jennifer Pioch piochjenni...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 3/25/09, Ignacio Marambio Catán darkjo...@gmail.com wrote:
And what happened after the review was aprobed exactly? were test
packages provided? someone at sun
On 2/6/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) *NOT* POSIX compliant
7) Continues to cause issues for users and developers when dealing
with multiple systems
7, unfortunately, is not as it requires replacing /bin/sh with /bin/bash
and that, I think, it something few would be
On 2/6/08, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 12:30 PM, Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 11:59 AM, Kyle McDonald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) *NOT*
On 2/6/08, Bruno Jargot [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/6/08, Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 11:23 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 6, 2008 11:08 AM, Joerg Schilling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Shawn
On 6/14/07, Gaopeng Chen - Sun China [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fingerprint Authentication
==
Project Overview:
-
The biometrics technology grows fast. Fingerprint authentication is
widely used in many situations. It's a valuable feature to support
On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug database, will
they be fixed? Is there any chance to see them fixed?
If they are serious bugs, then they may be
On 2/23/07, Ghee Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 2/16/07, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Girts Zeltins wrote:
Sorry, but I am talking again about CDE.
I want to know if founded CDE errors will be reported to bug
database, will they be fixed? Is there any
On 2/5/07, James C. McPherson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 2/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how far have the star or ksh projects progressed? The last one
appears to be in serious trouble now because Sun has to complain about
every little detail
On 2/5/07, Doug Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And how far have the star or ksh projects
progressed? The last one
appears to be in serious trouble now because Sun
has to complain about
every little detail and the star project
On 2/5/07, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm, how did JDS/gnome come up here??? Since it has, I assume
you don't like the look feel of JDS, and would prefer Gnome. This
is a subjective view rather than a degradation of quality
On 2/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And how far have the star or ksh projects progressed? The last one
appears to be in serious trouble now because Sun has to complain about
every little detail and the star project makes either zero progress or
no progress announcements.
The
On 2/2/07, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/2/07, Stephen Harpster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you want it to go faster, then participate.
Many of us are waiting that the first community project integrates.
We'd like to see
On 1/31/07, S Destika [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I agree with some of your post, but the rest is
simply untrue. There are plenty of design and
implementation discussions. There have been plenty of
good and bad words exchanged as well about particular
features, etc. There have been
On 1/31/07, Stephen Harpster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm the first to agree that the transition to Mercurial, getting the
source outside Sun's firewall, is going slower than I want.
How do you want to stimulate the growth of the Opensolaris community?
That may be more important right now.
t6mr1425644ugg.1170270097449;
Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.67.16.16 with HTTP; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 11:01:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 20:01:37 +0100
From: Josh Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: S Destika [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [osol
On 1/31/07, Glynn Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey,
Josh Hurst wrote:
On 1/31/07, Stephen Harpster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm the first to agree that the transition to Mercurial, getting the
source outside Sun's firewall, is going slower than I want.
How do you want to stimulate
On 1/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Peter Tribble wrote:
On 1/1/07, wb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a /tmp FS for swap, and a really big file crout*
inside. The /tmp was 95% up.
I decided to remove the crout file.
The problem, is the /tmp is not decreasing, but
On 1/5/07, Frank Hofmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Martin Bochnig wrote:
I think Sun has to overcome both not invented here and the instinctive
reject via not perfect, therefore not 'good enough' no matter what the
users say, before lsof goes into mainstream Solaris.
If
On 12/30/06, Boyd Adamson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/12/2006, at 5:08 AM, Josh Hurst wrote:
How can I boot (Open)Solaris into the Trusted Solaris mode?
Josh
It's not as simple as booting into Trusted Solaris mode. You need
to install and configure the Trusted Extensions.
There is ample
On 1/5/07, Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Note that lsof doesn't have to do kmem craling. For example on Linux
it only uses proper procfs interfaces. As such proper interfaces seem
to exist on Solaris as well for use with pfiles it shouldn't
On 1/5/07, Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just because /bin/sh isn't your shell of choice doesn't make it crappy.
Really?
Take 1:
/bin/sh /dev/urandom
Illegal Instruction (core dumped)
Take 2-29:
cat /var/adm/messages* | grep -F core.sh | sort
Dec 10 11:09:41 fido genunix: [ID
On 12/29/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do we have for SPAM filters ? Just curious.
The whole list system appears to be damaged. The whole ksh93 list
archive is gone. Maybe a hack?
Josh
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
How can I boot (Open)Solaris into the Trusted Solaris mode?
Josh
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 11/28/06, Stephen Lau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Planet OpenSolaris is now an official part of the OpenSolaris family,
and can now be found in its new home at:
http://planet.opensolaris.org
Roland, could you add Planet OpenSolaris to your rss reader?
Josh
On 11/8/06, Rich Teer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Josh Hurst wrote:
Why have all lists at opensolaris.org a -discuss ending? Its confusing.
They're not, hence opensolaris-code et al. The -discuss lists are
intended for general discussion about the bit before the -, so
zfs
-
Received: by 10.35.129.1 with SMTP id g1mr6053080pyn.1163008714367;
Wed, 08 Nov 2006 09:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.35.45.19 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Nov 2006 09:58:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 18:58:34 +0100
From: Josh Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 10/17/06, maoyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
I suggest that you wait until the ksh93 integration project is done
with it's work. The project suffers from excessive bureaucracy
overhead and
On 10/18/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst writes:
On 10/17/06, maoyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
I suggest that you wait until the ksh93 integration project is done
On 10/18/06, Josh Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst writes:
On 10/17/06, maoyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
4over6 is a project that makes ipv4 packets go through ipv6 network.
I suggest
On 10/18/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/06, Josh Hurst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/18/06, James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst writes:
On 10/17/06, maoyi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I want to post my 4over6 code.How?
4over6 is a project
On 8/30/06, Alan Coopersmith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Josh Hurst wrote:
I agree with you that the discussion should end here and how, however
only if Sun (including Dan Price) is willing to honor what I call the
original deal which includes the integration into ON and not SFW
Just a notification: Debian and Ubuntu are going to removal **ALL**
CDDL licensed materials from their distribution, stating that the
license is non-free and illegal (not GPL compatible).
-- Forwarded message --
From: Joerg Jaspert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Aug 11, 2006 10:51 PM
On 7/31/06, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Schaffstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Formal Proposal : Port OpenSolaris to PowerPC
+1
I suggest to make /bin/ksh ksh93 from the beginning that you don't
have to deal with any backwards compatibility fuzz later
Do
On 7/31/06, Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Schaffstall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Formal Proposal : Port OpenSolaris to PowerPC
+1
I suggest to make /bin/ksh ksh93 from the beginning that you don't
have to deal with any backwards compatibility fuzz later
Do
40 matches
Mail list logo
