solaris kdyndns[3689]: [ID 904790 user.error]
dyndns: both non-secure and secure updates failed on all configured name
servers
As always thanks,
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss
requires SASL support (-DSASL)
Warning: Option: AuthOptions requires SASL support (-DSASL)
But I thought that Solaris game with SASL? There is some old 2010
support docs which say download Cyrus SASL and sendmail and compile it
yourself, but I was hoping to avoid this.
Any comments?
Thanks,
Andrew
Cindy,
Thanks for that information and I am sure others will find it useful as
well.
Cheers,
Andrew
On 12/13/11 06:27 PM, Cindy Swearingen wrote:
Hi Andrew,
You can use the zfs set share to respecify property=value values or
you can use the zfs -c set to remove the property values so you
,
Andrew
On 12/10/11 05:05 PM, Chris Ridd wrote:
On 9 Dec 2011, at 16:05, Andrew Watkins wrote:
Hi,
I will try here as my first port of call.
I am using Samba to server files to our Windows users and I want them to change
permissions of files so they can give access to other users.
Before any
I know this is a Solaris 11 point, but I thought it would be still good
to post strange behavior with Solaris 11. At least if anyone else
notices it and to decide if it is a bug?
# zfs set share=name=andrew,path=/dpool/andrew,
prot=nfs,sec=sys,rw=*,public=true,log=global dpool
?
The blog entries I have followed (why are they never 100% complete!)
http://blog.mc-thias.org/?title=registering-a-samba-solaris-10-server-as-a-ms-ad-membermore=1c=1tb=1pb=1
http://blog.allanglesit.com/2011/03/solaris-11-join-ad-domain-for-samba/
Any pointers?
Cheers,
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck
Brian,
Thanks for the information, but it does not work. I will have another
look at the documentation, since I may be missing something in the new
release.
Andrew
On 11/14/11 07:36 PM, Brian Cameron wrote:
Andrew:
The functional replacement of the Primary Administrator RBAC profile
Can I ask if raidz is support on root with Solaris 11?
I am having problem doing it from auto-installer and I just thought that
may be the reason.
Cheers,
Andrew
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have lost the ability of making a user have access to root on Solaris
11 using the command pfexec.
On the old Solaris 11 express box it works:
===
% grep andrew /etc/user_attr
andrewprofiles=Primary Administrator;roles=root
% id
uid=102(andrew
On 09/11/2011 17:59, C. Bergström codest...@osunix.org wrote:
On 11/ 9/11 10:27 PM, Glynn Foster wrote:
Help spread the word!
Can you share a word or two on the plan for open source access? I ask
because you're posting this to what I thought was open source related
mailing lists..
I believe a while back last year I had asked if it were theoretically possible
to build a distro, and how much source must be with it, for which, I'm happy to
state, I got a clear answer. However, can one provide source only for
modified/built binaries, link to the Source Browser for unmodified
Once again, thank you. :) I remember receiving an original answer to the
source question last year.
Does an equivalent to sudo apt-get source package_name that exists on Linux,
exist for Solaris? For those unfamiliar, this downloads a .tar.gz format source
code package of the package requested
Ah. Thanks, again. Sounds like on the source end, now that I'm okay with GPL
software, I might stick with Linux.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
ifconfig device dhcp
On 25 March 2011 19:31, mattias m...@mjw.se wrote:
In linux i can type
Dhclient eth0
But i cant figure out the command in opensolaris
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
and Files
- remove C - Change Permissions
- remove o - Take Ownership
If Solaris User, then you seem to be right. It looks like the ACL is
being ignored in favour of the UNIX permissions
Is this what you get after adding deny!
# ls -lV DonotDELETE
-rwxr-xr-xr-x+ 1 andrew
will not bother working on it.
Also, I guess since it requires Intel help then the OpenSolaris versions
of Solaris will not get any fixes either. So, the question Solaris 11
is dead on desktops is becoming true
Cheers,
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com
boolean true
You may need to restart the window manager.
Andrew
On 12/ 3/10 05:21 PM, Randy Jones wrote:
On 12/03/10 10:55, Mariela Ortega wrote:
How can i configure solaris 11 to bring back GUI's from another
solaris 10 servers? or to use the system remetly with exceed or
xwin-32? or XDMCP?
i
trial/evaluation software. Like Solaris 10, production
use requires support contracts.
But, I thought security patches were always available for free?
But, I could be wrong!
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com
It is the first OpenSolaris based distro that allows to compile the
OpenSolaris
base (onnv or Illumos) on a free redistributable distribution.
Both Nexenta and OSUNIX have been doing this for a while AFAIK.
On 25 September 2010 18:25, Joerg Schilling
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de
OK--I think I understand source + software requirements. Once again, as stated
earlier, thank you OpenSolaris team for answering!
-- Andrew
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
Thank you, everyone, for the time and effort put forth into answering this
question. I apologize for replying back 5 days later.
I think I fully understand any distro's requirements under open source law.
Basically, in summary of what I've read, one can build software from
pre-compiled source
Hi,
I'm the guy that created StormOS and apart from a friend of mine that does
the graphics it's a one man show. All ~2000 packages in the repository were
put there by myself.
The ISO's on the site are _very_ out of date since I decided that my effort
would be best spent fixing the underlying
A big thank you to everyone who replied. It's appreciated. :)
Basically, assessing everything said so far, to make a distro, one has to:
1. Build it from source
2. Include the binaries
3. Follow the guide for remastering
--
Or, could it be include all
Hello. I had a question, after reading through the CDDL. If I wanted to make a
distro/respin, (and this is only out of sheer curiousity), would all the
OpenSolaris source have to be downloaded with it, or would it only have to be
anything built or modified upon? I've read what it says on
On 08/12/10 03:58 PM, andrew wrote:
--- On Wed, 8/11/10, Alan Coopersmith
alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
#3 It does not make sense to discontinue
development of opensolaris.
Some
day they'll have to make a solaris 12, you
know. But they're
it?
You may now begin the flaming! ;-)
Cheers
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. Unfortunately I don't seem to have
a copy.
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
My workstation is not on a UPS and experienced a hard-shutdown the other day
due to a commercial power outage. It booted up cleanly afterwards; however, my
NIC is does not seem to be functional unless 'snoop' is running. I've tried
setting a static IP, using DHCP, triple-checked the subnet
of the noises coming
out of Oracle right now. In my view Sun waited too long between the release of
Solaris 10 and Solaris Next. Solaris Next should have been released in 2009, in
my view.
Cheers
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
On 07/19/10 03:53 AM, andrew wrote:
...
So the big question is: will Solaris Next use IPS
packaging? My money is on IPS packaging but a big fat
CPIO-based DVD installation similar to S10 but using
the new Caiman installers from OpenSolaris (local
text and graphics-based installs plus via
to use cpio
for something new.
No, he was simply referring to the OS install cd's,
which have used cpio
for a long time.
Precisely. There is nothing new about using CPIO for Solaris install CDs or
DVDs. Something new would be using an IPS on-disk format for these. ;-)
Cheers
Andrew
OpenSolaris 2010.02... 03... 04... 05... 06!
If you ask me Oracle should be re named to Orifice
sarcasm alert
No, they just wanted to bring back the dreaded nickname slowlaris.
/sarcasm alert
Let's try to keep things here like we have a little humor and self-irony,
please? ;)
O.k. :)
Have I got a car for you, next time you're looking
for one:
http://www.treehugger.com/picture-is-worth-sum-car-parts.jpg
Easy assembly. Shouldn't take you long.
Oh wait...
Hm-m-m-m-m-m-m-m-m... O.k, I'll consider bying it somewhat later if you
kindly explain me where's the keyboard
I think my old mother has an advanced 3D puzzle for a
flower vase as well. Should keep you busy... ;)
In no case. I'll just type make world, and it will be done automagically. ;)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
There's a lot of mystery here surrounding my reasoning around not supporting
the GNU General Public License. I don't blame anyone for that. Firstly, what is
the definition of open source?
- It is a common belief that source and software should be open and shared
amongst people without
Cool. Thanks for the advice, everyone! I'll see what works out in this case.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I appreciate all the help and feedback, but I think I'll stop my part in
discussing the whole GPL and GNOME thing further. It is really opening up a can
of worms I did not originally intend to open at all. I simply had a question
that sparked out of 100% curiosity. Thank you everyone for your
Thanks. This is what I envisioned would have been the answer to this question
before even asked. I have used both GNOME and KDE--aware a community fuels it's
popularity and license, and considering the fact GNOME is made not only for
OpenSolaris, but for Linux and Unix-like systems as well,
New threads popped up while replying to another thread...
However, compiling and putting Fluxbox on OpenSolaris then would be the viable
option, since the licensing for GNOME cannot be changed. (I don't think I'd
want to convince anyone to change GNOME either.) :)
--
This message posted from
I was thinking of getting feedback on window managers and licensing, but I
wasn't thinking so many threads would accumulate! :-) This is getting
interesting
Getting back to an original comment--apparently, yes, OpenSolaris does indeed
use the GRUB bootloader--I noted that upon first using
OK I'd better wrap this discussion up before taking up anyone else's time
on the forum. I understand there are questions pertaining to hardware or just
plainly more important questions than these.
Apparently, as much as I like using OpenSolaris, without the ability to
completely change the
Before **completely** quitting discussing OpenSolaris GNOME here, I might add
someone could install a shell to go on top of GNOME once logged in (though it'd
take more startup time), then run OpenSolaris. Installing an alternative
bootloader might do the trick for not using GRUB at startup.
Sorry about so many posts--this is really the last question I've got for
OpenSolaris! After this, I'm gonna quit putting up threads for a while! :) And,
hopefully, this is a quick, short question--not opening a can of worms like the
GNOME licensing thing.
OK. With Mac, you've got VMWare
I'm aware of the 'GPL situation'. As stated in my previous post yesterday,
Apparently, as much as I like using OpenSolaris, without the ability to
completely change the GPL components to where they're dwindled to simply
coreutils and a LILO bootloader or something miniature in respect to the
of the initiator generally rectifies the issue. Occasionally, the
problem self corrects after various timeout and reset times expire on the
Windows side.
Please advise.
TIA, Andrew Jones
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris
Out of curiousity, is it possible to convert the GPL-licensed GNOME on
OpenSolaris to the CDDL or MIT licenses? We are NOT talking of LGPL here.
I'm well aware that any code or really 'software' deemed compatible with the
GPL underneath another license compatible becomes GPL or at least, GPL in
Sorry I've replied to the post late! Thank you for the help so far!
I'll work with the terminal using the commands you've supplied and get back to
you shortly.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Thanks for the commands and support so far. The only issue is that when I type
the commands you had specified,
and...@netbook:~# rmformat
Looking for devices...
No removables found.
and...@netbook:~# format
Searching for disks...done
AVAILABLE DISK SELECTIONS:
0. c8d0 DEFAULT cyl 9844
Thanks, everyone! I have a *small* understanding now of OpenSolaris disks! The
disk is now mounted and I used ls -l to list it by mount point when I finished
mapping it out.
(In case anyone was wondering, I originally wrote premoron/pre in one
sentence. The blog five-starred it when I reviewed
Hello, I've got an issue with a partition I cannot seem to access. I'm familiar
how drives are mounted in Linux and mapped in Windows. For instance, /dev/sda5
underneath the Linux platform would describe my partition, D:\ under Windows
would've described it.
Here's the issue:
When I ls /dev
, support for VSS and ACLs.
As with everything, I supposed it depends on what your requirements are.
Also, printing should be added to this list, if OpenSolaris is your
printer server!
Andrew
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss
automatically:
http://dlc.sun.com/osol/docs/content/2009.06/AIinstall/customai.html#iepartition
Andrew
Hi,
in order to determine what might went wrong, could you please attach
following information ?
(Run all commands within booted AI image - e.g. right after the
installation fails)
- AI manifest
Is Oracle really closing OpenSolaris?
On 25 May 2010 15:21, James Grisanzio jim.grisan...@sun.com wrote:
Apologies for the profanity earlier on this thread. I suspended the account
and the mail will be removed from the archives. This is a violation of the
TOU.
Jim
Just curious what is the basic plan for VPN solutions for Opensolaris or even
Solaris in general?
The answer actually differs depending on what do you actually want from VPN.
Before someone begins, one should clearly answer yourself what ISO layer he
wants to tunnel through.
In a case if
... And the fourth, missed by me in my previous message: yes, OpenVPN can be
used to build L3 tunnels as of L2 ones. :)
P.S: Some words about vpnc -- open source client part for Cisco VPDNs. I've
experimented with it, but I can't made it to work stable. :(
--
This message posted from
Support for thin reclamation depends on the SCSI WRITE SAME command; see this
draft of a document from T10:
http://www.t10.org/ftp/t10/document.05/05-270r0.pdf.
I spent some time searching the source code for support for WRITE SAME, but I
wasn't able to find much. I assume that if it was
What ever happens to (Open)Solaris the new version of Solaris (Solaris
Next again Oracle Welcome Session) will surly be based of
OpenSolaris.. I guess the only key word will be Open
Andrew
George Koutras wrote:
I start shivering to the idea that oracle might drop opensolaris or keep
this work
easier, but it is still
in the implementation stage.
Vikram
The big one is to stop the kernel choking when it tries to remount the root
filesystem. The kernel needs the ability to use the pool's GUID to find it,
rather than relying on the device path.
Cheers
Andrew.
On Wednesday
Just wondering if anyone worked out the problem with the slow reboot with iscsi.
I am seeing this myself now.
Andrew
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Hi,
Performance was also pretty terrible on my old Core 2 Quad with 4GB RAM.
That was one of the main reasons I switched to Nexenta (http://nexenta.org).
Andy
On 27 February 2010 10:52, Bruno Damour br...@ruomad.net wrote:
well the whole install took 2 hours
for 1 pkg !!
it seems that disk
since
128a - but it happens more often. with 133 not as often as with 132 but
yesterday 2 times.
Thinkpad T61p with 4GB RAM - Virtualbox with win64 running .
Freeze occurs in the same manner - tcp defensive mode on ... by by OS
Andrew
Not that one again :(
On 5 February 2010 10:55, Ginn Chen ginn.c...@sun.com wrote:
No, on the contrary, nightly builds are only against OpenSolaris.
It could not start on b132, because an old bug was triggered by a change
between snv_131 and snv_132.
You can use LD_BIND_NOW=1 ./firefox to
Anything unusual in /var/adm/messages?
On 2 February 2010 18:48, Amos Deering a...@unitedcts.com wrote:
Any More insight on this situation, I have a similar problem.
I have 2 Intel Pro/1000 MT Dual Port cards and one AOC-SAT2-MV8 card.
when the AOC-SAT2-MV8 is in the system the nics work,
Has any one gone to http://www.sun.com today?
You get http://www.oracle.com
Very quick change
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Well, I am sure over the next few weeks we will get lots of version
upgrades:
Oracle Studio 12.2
Oracle Solaris 10 02/10
and
OracleOS 5.10.1
Andrew
On 28/01/2010 21:02, Sergio Schvezov wrote:
On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 22:24 +0800, Norbert P. Copones wrote:
but a link to opensolaris
Only one of those addresses automatic/stack variables: Purify. Even then, for
Solaris you have to go back to Solaris 10u4 or so to get Purify support.
Yes, dtrace can find memory leaks. But that's kind of like using a crowbar as
a paperweight: it works, but there are a lot easier tools to
Hi Jason,
Sounds to me like what you're after is StormOS (stormos.org) or even
NexentaCore (nexenta.org). NexentaCore is basically Ubuntu Server Edition
with an OpenSolaris kernel. StormOS adds a usable XFCE based desktop
environment and a few other things to it.
Andy.
2010/1/11 Jason Harvey
Check this out: http://laptops.toshiba.com/laptops/tecra/M10 Where is says
Astonishingly thin, light and portable.
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:53 AM, andrew wrote:
On 01/ 1/10 10:36 AM, andrew wrote:
Sorry - my mistake. Still looking for ability to
install from local files though. ;-)
You can do that now as long as you're willing to
run
a depot server
(which is a very light-weight easy to start
div id=jive-html-wrapper-div
br
br
andrew wrote:
blockquote
cite=mid:1485805089.881262654193109.JavaMail.Twebapp
sf-app1
type=cite
pre wrap=!It doesn't have an option to use
external power, however I'm assuming I can power it
off a USB port on another PC. I'll give that a try
tell me if this fix is expected to make it into build 131 or 132, i.e.
in time for 2010.02?
Thanks
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 01/ 5/10 06:12 AM, andrew wrote:
On Jan 3, 2010, at 6:53 AM, andrew wrote:
On 01/ 1/10 10:36 AM, andrew wrote:
Sorry - my mistake. Still looking for ability
to
install from local files though. ;-)
You can do that now as long as you're willing to
run
a depot server
(which
Hi,
The fix is on track to make build 132 and 2010.02.
I have checked this issue. The R600 does power off
but it takes a very long
time (approx 2-3 minutes).
Cool - thanks for the update.
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
at either of
these for 2010.02?
The responsible engineer for 6913815 but my attempt to guess his sun email
address has failed. :-(
Thanks
Andrew.
Message was edited by: andrewk7
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing
at either of
these for 2010.02?
The responsible engineer for 6913815 but my attempt
to guess his sun email address has failed. :-(
Thanks
Andrew.
Message was edited by: andrewk7
That last bit should have read:
The responsible engineer for 6913815 is Randy Fishel but my attempt to guess
Many thanks.
Andrew.
Hi Andrew,
I fwded your e-mail to RandyF.
Best regards,
Milan
andrew píše v po 04. 01. 2010 v 02:16 -0800:
I filed 6913815 since I didn't see it tracked
elsewhere - the Tecra M10 won't shutdown or
restart
through BIOS if VT extensions are enabled. I
On 01/ 4/10 05:07 AM, andrew wrote:
This bug is Toshiba M10 takes too long to
suspend-to-RAM. This problem only occurs if VT
extensions are enabled. If they are disabled, suspend
to RAM appears to succeed in the expected timeframe.
However, resuming fails if VT extensions are
disabled
On 01/ 4/10 05:07 AM, andrew wrote:
This bug is Toshiba M10 takes too long to
suspend-to-RAM. This problem only occurs if VT
extensions are enabled. If they are disabled,
suspend
to RAM appears to succeed in the expected
timeframe.
However, resuming fails if VT extensions
On 01/ 4/10 01:04 PM, andrew wrote:
Is your Tecra M10 an OpenSolaris model with the
nVidia graphics or the more common variant with Intel
graphics? Mine has nVidia graphics and a build 130
install which was image-updated from build 125
doesn't come back up properly from suspend with VT
On 01/ 4/10 02:59 PM, andrew wrote:
Hmm that's odd. I wonder if it is because I'm
booting it off an eSATA hard drive powered from the
USB ports.
What does powered mean?
The Tecra M10 has an eSATA port on the left side.
It is connected via the eSATA port and draws its power from
have a long boot time but I've not tried upgrading from
2009.06 (which is build 111b).
Cheers
Andrew.
Message was edited by: andrewk7
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 01/ 4/10 01:04 PM, andrew wrote:
Is your Tecra M10 an OpenSolaris model with the
nVidia graphics or the more common variant with
Intel
graphics? Mine has nVidia graphics and a build 130
install which was image-updated from build 125
doesn't come back up properly from suspend
On 01/ 4/10 03:50 PM, andrew wrote:
OK, I've installed OpenSolaris build 130 on the
internal hard drive and suspend to RAM and resume
both work absolutely fine with VT extensions
disabled. Cool!
If your external drive has an option to use a
dedicated
power supply, it would
On 01/ 1/10 10:36 AM, andrew wrote:
Sorry - my mistake. Still looking for ability to
install from local files though. ;-)
You can do that now as long as you're willing to run
a depot server
(which is a very light-weight easy to start/run
process).
However, if you're wanting
andrew wrote:
We've never had 2 copies of all the packages on
the
live CD - why do you think
there are?
Because I was under the impression that there are
two copies of each piece of software on the live CD -
executable directly from the CD and as cpio archives
for installation
andrew wrote:
So OpenSolaris 2010.02 will not even support
printing out of the box, I now need to download and
install several meg of packages just to print?
Of course 2010.03 will support printing - is your
problem a printer not
supported by the included CUPS drivers?
My problem
On 12/30/09 08:01 AM, andrew wrote:
My problem is that the print manager entry on the
administration menu is now dead - nothing ever
appears after clicking on it and there is no obvious
way to get access to the GUI administration for
printing. The novice user is therefore stuck
since
there is obviously no way to get them put back in.
Not happy!
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the gnome desktop on the machine but did have CIFS enabled
(idmap size=815M, RSS=161M)
QUOTE: The swap volume size that is created during an initial
installation is based on 1/2 the size of physical memory, but is
generally in the 512 Mbyte to 2 Gbyte range. from opensolaris.org
Andrew
PS
Nexenta.org
2009/11/24 Chad Welsh unixphr...@mac.com
I guess when people don't like the truth they stop helping no matter, huh?
Well you all have a fun time with Sol-nux and stay in your yummy gummy dream
world while us true believers stomp the turf with the tried and true heavy
metal hitter
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
. Is this a known bug?
Thanks
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
the corner.
Andrew
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com/
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I can confirm the Asus M3A78-EM works nicely with OS. I've been running this
since ~200811 with an AM2 proc, 4x 2GB DDR2 ECC DIMMs and a combination of
onboard SATA and an AOC-USASLP-L8i.
The onboard SATA controller (5x ports +1 eSATA) works in both IDE and SATA mode
(although I recall some
It usually gets started by the session manager, just gnome-settings-manager,
etc..
2009/10/15 Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com
I'm getting messages about gnome-keyring-daemon:
Oct 15 10:38:32 zfs gnome-keyring-daemon[1942]: [ID 702911
auth.notice] couldn't open store file:
in any form ...etc
8.1.1 Will support http, https client/ server protocols
8.1.4 Will support boot from network but use local client profile on
USB, CD/DVD
8.2.1 CD/DVD/USB automated installation will be supported
--
Andrew Watkins * Birkbeck College
http://notallmicrosoft.blogspot.com
. This problem is usually caused my your hard disk controller not being
supported by OpenSolaris. Can you run the Device Detection Tool on the
desktop and see what it says about your disk controller?
Cheers
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I have installed Open Solaris 10 and i configured the
machine using sys-unconfig.
urg=Urgent.
Any ideas around it?
Which network service are you trying to access? SSH? NFS?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss
Indiana
- No DVD image of OpenSolaris Indiana
I know it is on the way but!
- No text Console install process
I am not talking about tty
- Sparse zones
- No clear method of upgrade from Solaris - OpenSolaris
End of an era.
Andrew
!
Cheers
Andrew.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
1 - 100 of 384 matches
Mail list logo
