On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle.
This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks.
see: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix
I just tried booting this image on my Acer Aspire AspireAS3810T-6827
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle.
This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks.
see: ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix
I just tried booting this image on my Acer Aspire AspireAS3810T-6827
On Fri, Sep 03, 2010 at 10:20:13AM +0200, casper@sun.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle.
This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks.
see:
Gary Mills mi...@cc.umanitoba.ca wrote:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 01:10:23PM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
SchilliX-0.7.1 is based on the latest ONNV source published by Oracle.
This is build 146 with 16 additional putbacks.
see:ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schillix
I just tried
Gabriele Bulfon gbul...@sonicle.com wrote:
Is i18n the only integration that suffice to make IllumOS as stable as
OpenSolaris for
production usages?
SchilliX uses only free bits and for this reason, it has no locale data
available. Once we have working i18n support in Illumos, this is a
--
Da: Joerg Schilling
A: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org maybird1...@yahoo.com
develo...@lists.illumos.org
Data: 31 agosto 2010 14.16.09 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [illumos-Developer] [osol-discuss] SchilliX-0.7.1 based on b147+
available
ken mays
--
Da: Joerg Schilling
A: opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org maybird1...@yahoo.com
gbul...@sonicle.com develo...@lists.illumos.org
Data: 31 agosto 2010 14.25.59 CEST
Oggetto: Re: [illumos-Developer] [osol-discuss] SchilliX-0.7.1 based on b147
Gabriele Bulfon gbul...@sonicle.com wrote:
That's great ;) andwhat are the missing features compared to latest
OpenSolaris dev? (if any...)
If you like to compare SchilliX with OpenSolaris, nothing is missing.
If you compare SchilliX to Indiana, things look different.
From the discussion
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Gabriele Bulfon gbul...@sonicle.com wrote:
That's great ;) andwhat are the missing features compared to latest
OpenSolaris dev? (if any...)
If you like to compare SchilliX with OpenSolaris, nothing is missing.
If you compare SchilliX to
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Gabriele Bulfon gbul...@sonicle.com wrote:
That's great ;) andwhat are the missing features compared to latest
OpenSolaris dev? (if any...)
If you like to compare SchilliX with
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Given the fact that
pkg search cc
does not show any /extra in the output, does this mean I could bundle the
studio compiler with SchilliX?
You should be able to bundle the version provided by the pkg repository,
under the terms of the
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 19:20 +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Alan Coopersmith alan.coopersm...@oracle.com wrote:
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
Gabriele Bulfon gbul...@sonicle.com wrote:
That's great ;) andwhat are the missing features compared to latest
OpenSolaris
12 matches
Mail list logo
