I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX was still intact.
This was with the development edition dev300_m53 (future v3.2).
http://download.openoffice.org/next/index.html
Awesome!
Now all we need to do is start lobbying all of the schools, universities, and
government agencies
I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX
was still intact.
This was with the development edition dev300_m53
(future v3.2).
How can I have both a stable OOo 3.1 and a development OOo version installed at
the same time in OpenSolaris 2009.06?
--
This message posted from
I dont know, but one way is to use IPS, then a new BE will be created. You
install them both via IPS, and will have in GRUB:
1. StableOOo31
2. DevOOo
And then you choose which to boot from.
Another way is to use Zones and install them in separate Zones - then you can
run them at the same time.
Thommy M. Malmström wrote:
I followed the instructions in 2977 and the text XX
was still intact.
This was with the development edition dev300_m53
(future v3.2).
How can I have both a stable OOo 3.1 and a development OOo version installed at
the same time in OpenSolaris 2009.06?
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in OpenSolaris 2009.06) and
with the development version of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of them. Can this just be
hearsay?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in
OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development version
of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of
them. Can this just be hearsay?
Hi Thommy,
A small correction I might add: the
W. Wayne Liauh wrote:
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in
OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development version
of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either of
them. Can this just be hearsay?
Hi Thommy,
A small correction I
I just tested with OOo 3.1 (the default install in
OpenSolaris 2009.06) and with the development
version
of upcoming 3.2 (DEV300_m53) also in OpenSolaris
2009.06 and I couldn't reproduce the bug in either
of
them. Can this just be hearsay?
Hi Thommy,
A small correction I
I've had users complain about this bug before:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/16/openoffice_autofilter_bug_feature/
The reason I'm bringing it up in OpenSolaris discuss is because my long term
goal in life is to eventually get every installed copy of Microsoft Office that
exists in the
Anon Y Mous wrote:
I've had users complain about this bug before:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/07/16/openoffice_autofilter_bug_feature/
The reason I'm bringing it up in OpenSolaris discuss is because my long term
goal in life is to eventually get every installed copy of Microsoft
10 matches
Mail list logo
