[osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Andrew Greimann
I believe a while back last year I had asked if it were theoretically possible to build a distro, and how much source must be with it, for which, I'm happy to state, I got a clear answer. However, can one provide source only for modified/built binaries, link to the Source Browser for unmodified

Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 04/ 1/11 01:35 PM, Andrew Greimann wrote: I believe a while back last year I had asked if it were theoretically possible to build a distro, and how much source must be with it, for which, I'm happy to state, I got a clear answer. However, can one provide source only for modified/built

Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Andrew Greimann
Once again, thank you. :) I remember receiving an original answer to the source question last year. Does an equivalent to sudo apt-get source package_name that exists on Linux, exist for Solaris? For those unfamiliar, this downloads a .tar.gz format source code package of the package requested

Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Alan Coopersmith
On 04/ 1/11 04:21 PM, Andrew Greimann wrote: Once again, thank you. :) I remember receiving an original answer to the source question last year. Does an equivalent to sudo apt-get source package_name that exists on Linux, exist for Solaris? For those unfamiliar, this downloads a .tar.gz

Re: [osol-discuss] Linking to Source Browser OK?

2011-04-01 Thread Andrew Greimann
Ah. Thanks, again. Sounds like on the source end, now that I'm okay with GPL software, I might stick with Linux. -- This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org