Joerg> I thought I was on osol-code but then it seems I am not
Hmm, you're listed in the mailman membership list.
Did you get any of the messages that were posted since Friday?
Joerg> it is impossible to subscribe if the mailman interface does not
Joerg> work
What problem are you having w
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 11:23, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> Thank you for doing this work.
I'm still pondering a way to make it public, both to play around with
one potential tool for the project and to make it easier publish and
manage patches (adapting them to a newer tree is just a "monotone merge"
aw
Stephen Lau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Why is there no official announcement on this list as it has
> > been before Jne 14th?
>
> This is partly my fault. I talked it over with Mike Kupfer (who made
> the previous announcements), and we thought that it would be unnecessary
> to announce it
Patrick Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:14, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > any comments?
> see http://www.openbios.org/~oxygene/opensolaris.txt.bz2 for what
> changed in the various source drops (06-12, 07-01, 07-20, 08-18)
Thank you for doing this work.
Although I would
Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support
(APAC) wrote:
I would have thought that this would be the perfect thing to be
delivered in an RSS feed.
I agree, but it needn't be an "or". Announcements should be available via
osol-announce, opensolaris.org
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Alan Hargreaves - Product Technical Support (APAC) wrote:
> I would have thought that this would be the perfect thing to be
> delivered in an RSS feed.
I agree, but it needn't be an "or". Announcements should be available via
osol-announce, opensolaris.org, an RSS feed, and
Rich Teer wrote:
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Mike Kupfer wrote:
I agree that polling for changes is a pain. But if we can deliver new
updates on a regular basis, and an announcement is posted on the web
site front page, is an email announcement really necessary? If you're
not reading the announceme
Mike Kupfer wrote:
But if we can deliver new
updates on a regular basis, and an announcement is posted on the web
site front page, is an email announcement really necessary?
Yes. I only noticed this release by accident yesterday. Whether it is
an osol-announce or an RSS feed as others sugg
How about offering an RSS feed for the announcements section?
Should be pretty easy to set up and meet the immediate needs fairly
transparently.
--Wez.
Mike Kupfer wrote:
I agree that polling for changes is a pain. But if we can deliver new
updates on a regular basis, and an announcement is
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> > "Al" == Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Al> The real issue is that there was no transparency to the user
> Al> community in the decision making process.
>
> That's not entirely true.
>
> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageI
> "Al" == Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Al> The real issue is that there was no transparency to the user
Al> community in the decision making process.
That's not entirely true.
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/message.jspa?messageID=7212&tstart=0
mike
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> A few people have asked why there wasn't an email announcement for the
> build 20 delivery, especially since there were email announcements for
> each delivery during the Pilot program.
>
> The reasons were
>
> 1. we're trying to move to a regular delivery
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Mike Kupfer wrote:
> I agree that polling for changes is a pain. But if we can deliver new
> updates on a regular basis, and an announcement is posted on the web
> site front page, is an email announcement really necessary? If you're
> not reading the announcements on the we
A few people have asked why there wasn't an email announcement for the
build 20 delivery, especially since there were email announcements for
each delivery during the Pilot program.
The reasons were
1. we're trying to move to a regular delivery schedule (so special
announcements are not needed
* Felix Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-24 13:30]:
> On 8/24/05, Patrick Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:14, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > > any comments?
> > see http://www.openbios.org/~oxygene/opensolaris.txt.bz2
>
> Is there no Bonsai/CVSblame for the source tre
Joerg Schilling wrote:
* Felix Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-24 13:14]:
Today we had a slightly bad discussion on irc.freenode.de about
OpenSolaris being a marketing move and no real project (main argument:
no source updates since 14-Jun-2005) and the guy ("jinderhawk")
prepares a story
Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Felix Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-24 13:14]:
> > Today we had a slightly bad discussion on irc.freenode.de about
> > OpenSolaris being a marketing move and no real project (main argument:
> > no source updates since 14-Jun-2005) and the guy ("ji
Felix Schulte wrote:
These are code drops but contain zero content information *why* things
were changed (3rd claim from IRC: Sun provides no changelog and
per-issue source diff, making the project useless for non-sun
contributors).
Hi Felix,
I did the August 18th code drop. We are trying to
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:40:20PM +0200, Felix Schulte wrote:
>
> A mailing list for CVS commits would be cool (which notifies
> subscribers about commits and new/deleted CVS tags (for releases)
> being made) ...
>
Again, more things on the TODO list. The first step is to figure out
how to make
Felix Schulte wrote:
A mailing list for CVS commits would be cool (which notifies
subscribers about commits and new/deleted CVS tags (for releases)
being made) ...
That would require deciding to use CVS first, and that's a whole
can of worms yet to be solved.
(I agree though with the general p
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:30, Felix Schulte wrote:
> Is there no Bonsai/CVSblame for the source tree at opensolaris.org?
there is no public revision control system in place yet, basically
because
none was chosen yet. the import into monotone that led to the changelog
I
posted was done manually by me
Hi Felix,
Today we had a slightly bad discussion on irc.freenode.de about
OpenSolaris being a marketing move and no real project (main argument:
no source updates since 14-Jun-2005) and the guy ("jinderhawk")
prepares a story on slashdot based on that discussion... any comments?
I just looked
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 10:30:01PM +0200, Felix Schulte wrote:
> On 8/24/05, Patrick Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:14, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > > any comments?
> > see http://www.openbios.org/~oxygene/opensolaris.txt.bz2
>
> Is there no Bonsai/CVSblame for the sou
On 8/24/05, Dragan Cvetkovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >
> > The current source on the Sun Download Center is dated 18 August; this
> > corresponds to Build 20, I believe. There was an earlier release on
> > 20 July, still available at genunix.org.
On Wed, 24 Aug 2005, Stephen Hahn wrote:
The current source on the Sun Download Center is dated 18 August; this
corresponds to Build 20, I believe. There was an earlier release on
20 July, still available at genunix.org.
See http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads for links to the various
On 8/24/05, Patrick Mauritz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:14, Felix Schulte wrote:
> > any comments?
> see http://www.openbios.org/~oxygene/opensolaris.txt.bz2
Is there no Bonsai/CVSblame for the source tree at opensolaris.org?
>for what
> changed in the various source dro
* Felix Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-08-24 13:14]:
> Today we had a slightly bad discussion on irc.freenode.de about
> OpenSolaris being a marketing move and no real project (main argument:
> no source updates since 14-Jun-2005) and the guy ("jinderhawk")
> prepares a story on slashdot based o
On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 22:14, Felix Schulte wrote:
> any comments?
see http://www.openbios.org/~oxygene/opensolaris.txt.bz2 for what
changed in the various source drops (06-12, 07-01, 07-20, 08-18)
patrick mauritz
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
op
Today we had a slightly bad discussion on irc.freenode.de about
OpenSolaris being a marketing move and no real project (main argument:
no source updates since 14-Jun-2005) and the guy ("jinderhawk")
prepares a story on slashdot based on that discussion... any comments?
--
_Felix Schu
29 matches
Mail list logo
