[osol-discuss] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] project proposal __/__ WAS: Re: Re: Re: Is M

2007-01-05 Thread UNIX admin
Second, when we criticize Firefox, we should perhaps also mention the version number. The 1.5s are dogs. Firefox 2.0 is now included in 54+. If snv_54 is the one that integrated Vermillion, then that's the Firefox I've in the meantime learned to *love to hate*. It's a really crappy

[osol-discuss] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] project proposal __/__ WAS: Re: Re: Re: Is M

2007-01-05 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
the UI is quite different don't help Firefox's case either. You need to go into about:config to change the UIs to suit your taste (e.g., the way tabs are closed, etc.) This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

[osol-discuss] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] project proposal __/__ WAS: Re: Re: Re: Is M

2007-01-04 Thread W. Wayne Liauh
Who else is interested? Thoughts? If this question were asked a year ago, I would have raised my both hands. But things have changed a lot. It took me a while to get used to not using the Moz suite, but now I don't even install Seamonkey in my Linux partitions. Second, when we criticize

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] project proposal __/__ WAS: Re: Re: Re: Is M

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
W. Wayne Liauh wrote: If this question were asked a year ago, I would have raised my both hands. But things have changed a lot. It took me a while to get used to not using the Moz suite, but now I don't even install Seamonkey in my Linux partitions. Second, when we criticize Firefox, we

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: [EMAIL PROTECTED] project proposal __/__ WAS: Re: Re: Re: Is M

2007-01-04 Thread Martin Bochnig
Martin Bochnig wrote: W. Wayne Liauh wrote: p.s. The SUNWqemu packages are slightly delayed (due to a spontanous travel), but are in the works. Literally and in this minute. PLease expect them tomorrow evening or something. Will the accelerator be a part of the SUNWqemu