[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Porting ReiserFS to Solaris?

2005-10-17 Thread UNIX admin
I also think XFS would be damn good for opensolaris. That would be phenomenal. XFS is absolutely state of the art (on IRIX / IRX64 6.5.x at least). Now if we only had GRUB stage 1.5 and stage 2 XFS reader, we could do a complete install of Solaris11/Nevada/OpenSolaris on XFS... Don't get me

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Porting ReiserFS to Solaris?

2005-10-17 Thread S Destika
b iIf you use an email client, Do NOT reply to this email, just reply to the mailing list. If you do a reply or reply all it will bounce. (I am planning to correct this anamoly soon.) /i /b br br You say the Windows driver is free and the distribution says it is GPL licensed. So where is the

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Porting ReiserFS to Solaris?

2005-10-13 Thread S.K. Sammandam
S.K. Sammandam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The crossmeta driver binary on Windows is free without any warranty. The addon driver modules from Linux is open-source, whereas The crossmeta kernel based on freebsd VFS is not open-source yet. This has to do with the Microsoft IFS licensing and

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: Porting ReiserFS to Solaris?

2005-09-05 Thread Ivan Wang
Not know what others said about ReiserFS, but in my experience ReiserFS gives me far less trouble than ext2/ext3. Especially when recover from power interruption. Even with journalizing, ext3 fs on our local servers suffer from data corruption and needed to be fsck'ed ;) during power