[osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal: Enable/Enhance Solaris support for Intel Platforms

2007-03-01 Thread Oliver Jones
I have something else to add, too. I also think that focusing on the Xeon platform alone would be an error. Good support needs to be there for the Bearlake and Bearlake-X when they arrive, as well as the Santa Rosa laptop chipset. The vast majority of people who are interested in running

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal: Enable/Enhance Solaris support for Intel Platforms

2007-03-01 Thread Shawn Walker
On 02/03/07, Oliver Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I also think that focusing on the Xeon platform alone would be an error. Good support needs to be there for the Bearlake and Bearlake-X when they arrive, as well as the Santa Rosa laptop chipset. Certainly, and I think that will happen. I

[osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal: Enable/Enhance Solaris support for Intel Platforms

2007-02-10 Thread David Comay
+1 dsc This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org

[osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal: Enable/Enhance Solaris support for Intel Platforms

2007-02-08 Thread Bob Palowoda
I'd like to propose a project to enable and enhance Solaris support for shipping and future Intel processors and platforms. As we are all aware of, Sun and Intel have formed an alliance to make Solaris the Unix operating system of choice on Intel platforms. We believe the only sensible

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Project Proposal: Enable/Enhance Solaris support for Intel Platforms

2007-02-08 Thread Sherry Moore
Hi Bob, Why should the first effort be server based platforms when the majority of the problems Intel/Sun based are laptop issues, i.e. wifi and wimax drivers. Laptop install support etc. Or is the primary opensolaris discussion based on server hardware technology that could be delivered