[osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-04-02 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
On solaris versions that use grub, modloading the driver is more obnoxious, in that it causes a reboot to update the boot archive, because it touches /etc/name_to_major. This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ opensolaris-discuss mailing list

[osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-03-31 Thread UNIX admin
You haven't tried the new version - have you? The new version is pkg format and it's fully Solaris 10 compliant. You're not going to like what I will write, but you've got some ways to go before you can claim that you're fully Solaris 10 compliant. First of all: Adding OSS startup scripts

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-03-31 Thread James Carlson
UNIX admin writes: There should be no uninstall steps. The *proper* way to *remove* software on UNIX is to use the software subsystem, in case of Solaris, the `pkgrm` command. Note that pkgrm just removes one package, and if you have multiple packages or configurable sets, it's clumsy at

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-03-31 Thread Darren J Moffat
James Carlson wrote: Though I agree it's unfortunate, it is the case that many things -- including Sun's own products -- come with custom install/uninstall scripts. Those scripts should invoke packaging commands under the covers, and figuring out prodreg(1M) would be better, but the existence

[osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-03-31 Thread Dev Mazumdar
UX_ADM, Please get some manners before posting! I will not be drawn into a shouting match with someone who has no clue about audio and device drivers. Best regards Dev Mazumdar 4Front Technologies This message posted from opensolaris.org ___

[osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-03-31 Thread Bill Rushmore
Anyway, back to the important question..why isn't anybody talking about audio? (I don't care if it's OSS drivers or Sun drivers or Tools.de drivers). Audio is a multibillion dollar business - Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and Cisco are all into audio and minting money, why not Sun?

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-03-31 Thread Bart Smaalders
Bill Rushmore wrote: Anyway, back to the important question..why isn't anybody talking about audio? (I don't care if it's OSS drivers or Sun drivers or Tools.de drivers). Audio is a multibillion dollar business - Apple, Microsoft, Yahoo, Google and Cisco are all into audio and minting money,

[osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-03-31 Thread UNIX admin
UX_ADMIN, The reason why we need to add a startup script to RC is because we need to guarantee that if there are multiple audio devices, then they all startup in the right order. Solaris doesn't guarantee the order in which drivers are started by the system unlike Linux. The drivers

[osol-discuss] Re: RFC: How about an audio newsgroup?

2006-03-29 Thread UNIX admin
I'd like to propose an audio newsgroup where all things audio related could be discussed. Not a bad idea. Open Sound System v4.0 is free for personal use and we have recently released Solaris 10/11 support for x86/amd64/sparc. The new OSS drivers provide full OSS and SADA (devaudio) API