Re: [osol-discuss] Re: sshfs for solaris

2007-04-20 Thread Darren J Moffat
Jan Hendrik Mangold wrote: For encrypted NFS, the clean thing to do is configure IPSec between two hosts, not tunnel over SSH. Tunneling NFS over SSH would be a kludge in this case. Plus, IPSec covers all TCP/IP traffic, not just NFS, so that's an added bonus. true, but how do you do that betw

[osol-discuss] Re: sshfs for solaris

2007-04-19 Thread Gary Gendel
The port of fuse is actively being worked on. And rudimentary capabilities have been ported. However, I don't think enough of it is ported to be truely useful as yet, but it's getting close. I would check out the discuss-fuse forum to see what the current status is. FUSE would make a lot of thin

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: sshfs for solaris

2007-04-19 Thread Shawn Walker
On 19/04/07, UNIX admin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am trying to get sshfs compiled for solaris, but I > can't get it to work. Has anybody had any success > doing this? Does it even work since it relies on > FUSE? I would prefer to use NFS via ssh, but my > server does not support NFSv4 (Mac O

[osol-discuss] Re: sshfs for solaris

2007-04-19 Thread Jan Hendrik Mangold
> For encrypted NFS, the clean thing to do is configure > IPSec between two hosts, not tunnel over SSH. > Tunneling NFS over SSH would be a kludge in this > case. > > Plus, IPSec covers all TCP/IP traffic, not just NFS, > so that's an added bonus. true, but how do you do that between a Mac and a

[osol-discuss] Re: sshfs for solaris

2007-04-19 Thread UNIX admin
> I am trying to get sshfs compiled for solaris, but I > can't get it to work. Has anybody had any success > doing this? Does it even work since it relies on > FUSE? I would prefer to use NFS via ssh, but my > server does not support NFSv4 (Mac OS X). I guess the question to start with is, is ther