it's so slow, that I need to wait ~1min to see the
cursor movement for moving my mouse.
Yep, and still the same with b127 and vbox 3.0.10.
Seems to happen when you use the 32-bit Xorg VESA driver
with virtualbox. A possible workaround is to define a 64-bit
virtualbox guest with 1GB (or more)
it's so slow, that I need to wait ~1min to see the
cursor movement for moving my mouse.
Message was edited by: yongsun
I have run into a different kind of problem; I wasn't even able to boot from
the b122 image (AMD quad-core, Nvidia video, 8 GB RAM, trying to boot from VBox
3.0.4 under
it's so slow, that I need to wait ~1min to see the cursor movement for moving
my mouse.
Message was edited by: yongsun
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
I have noticed this on my vista amd64 2 gb ram and intel duo sony laptop 2+1 gb
of ram.Previously 117 had better performance in both configurations.
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
How much RAM does the Mac have?
How much are you assigning to the VM?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
On 9/09/2009, at 10:35 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
I have noticed this on my vista amd64 2 gb ram and intel duo sony
laptop 2+1 gb of ram.Previously 117 had better performance in both
configurations.
I've also noticed this, but with an actual image-update to build 122 -
something between the
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 11:42 +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
On 9/09/2009, at 10:35 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
I have noticed this on my vista amd64 2 gb ram and intel duo sony
laptop 2+1 gb of ram.Previously 117 had better performance in both
configurations.
I've also noticed this, but
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 10:25 +0800, Harry Lu wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 11:42 +1200, Glynn Foster wrote:
On 9/09/2009, at 10:35 AM, Peter Jones wrote:
I have noticed this on my vista amd64 2 gb ram and intel duo sony
laptop 2+1 gb of ram.Previously 117 had better performance in
